基于养分流分析的斯里兰卡 2021 年短期化肥进口禁令的经验教训

Maya J. Fein-Cole, Mohamed Esham, Nilanthi Jayathilake, Miriam Otoo, Christopher Koliba, Gillian L. Galford, Katherine K. Porterfield, Isuru B. Wijethunga and Eric D. Roy*, 
{"title":"基于养分流分析的斯里兰卡 2021 年短期化肥进口禁令的经验教训","authors":"Maya J. Fein-Cole,&nbsp;Mohamed Esham,&nbsp;Nilanthi Jayathilake,&nbsp;Miriam Otoo,&nbsp;Christopher Koliba,&nbsp;Gillian L. Galford,&nbsp;Katherine K. Porterfield,&nbsp;Isuru B. Wijethunga and Eric D. Roy*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c0014910.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The Sri Lankan government’s 2021 policy to ban mineral fertilizer imports and shift to green agriculture provides an opportunity to examine the potential for nutrient recycling in a more circular economy. Here, we examined national-level nutrient flows in Sri Lanka to determine the capacity to offset mineral fertilizer with alternative nutrient sources, considering nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Beyond animal manure already applied to croplands, other nutrient sources, including municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and human excreta, have limited potential to offset mineral fertilizer imports. For example, MSW compost and early adoption of nutrient recovery from human excreta could provide N and P equal to only ≤10% of mineral fertilizer use. Furthermore, we used a grid-based resource recovery and distribution model to identify priority areas for the nutrient management transition in Sri Lanka. Reuse of recovered nutrients from MSW compost and human excreta in model scenarios was in urban and peri-urban areas, including home gardens, distant from much of the nation’s agriculture. Our findings reinforce calls for long-term strategic planning for transitions in nutrient management. Future policies should consider fundamental constraints on alternative nutrient sources and emphasize increasing capacity for both effective nutrient recycling and efficient mineral fertilizer use.</p><p >This paper identifies constraints on nutrient availability influencing the outcome of Sri Lanka’s controversial 2021 mineral fertilizer ban and makes broadly applicable recommendations for future agricultural nutrient management transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100015,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","volume":"1 11","pages":"2361–2371 2361–2371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from the Short-Lived 2021 Fertilizer Import Ban in Sri Lanka Based on Analysis of Nutrient Flows\",\"authors\":\"Maya J. Fein-Cole,&nbsp;Mohamed Esham,&nbsp;Nilanthi Jayathilake,&nbsp;Miriam Otoo,&nbsp;Christopher Koliba,&nbsp;Gillian L. Galford,&nbsp;Katherine K. Porterfield,&nbsp;Isuru B. Wijethunga and Eric D. Roy*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c0014910.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The Sri Lankan government’s 2021 policy to ban mineral fertilizer imports and shift to green agriculture provides an opportunity to examine the potential for nutrient recycling in a more circular economy. Here, we examined national-level nutrient flows in Sri Lanka to determine the capacity to offset mineral fertilizer with alternative nutrient sources, considering nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Beyond animal manure already applied to croplands, other nutrient sources, including municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and human excreta, have limited potential to offset mineral fertilizer imports. For example, MSW compost and early adoption of nutrient recovery from human excreta could provide N and P equal to only ≤10% of mineral fertilizer use. Furthermore, we used a grid-based resource recovery and distribution model to identify priority areas for the nutrient management transition in Sri Lanka. Reuse of recovered nutrients from MSW compost and human excreta in model scenarios was in urban and peri-urban areas, including home gardens, distant from much of the nation’s agriculture. Our findings reinforce calls for long-term strategic planning for transitions in nutrient management. Future policies should consider fundamental constraints on alternative nutrient sources and emphasize increasing capacity for both effective nutrient recycling and efficient mineral fertilizer use.</p><p >This paper identifies constraints on nutrient availability influencing the outcome of Sri Lanka’s controversial 2021 mineral fertilizer ban and makes broadly applicable recommendations for future agricultural nutrient management transitions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Sustainable Resource Management\",\"volume\":\"1 11\",\"pages\":\"2361–2371 2361–2371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Sustainable Resource Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯里兰卡政府制定了 2021 年禁止进口矿物肥料并转向绿色农业的政策,这为我们提供了一个机会,以考察在更加循环的经济中养分循环利用的潜力。在此,我们研究了斯里兰卡国家一级的养分流,以确定用替代养分来源(氮和磷)抵消矿物肥料的能力。除了已经施用于耕地的动物粪便外,包括城市固体废物堆肥和人类排泄物在内的其他养分来源抵消矿物肥料进口的潜力有限。例如,城市固体废弃物堆肥和人类排泄物养分回收的早期采用可提供的氮和磷仅相当于矿物肥料用量的 ≤10%。此外,我们还利用基于网格的资源回收和分配模型,确定了斯里兰卡养分管理转型的优先领域。在模型方案中,从城市固体废弃物堆肥和人类排泄物中回收的养分主要用于城市和城郊地区,包括家庭菜园,而这些地区远离全国大部分农业地区。我们的研究结果进一步呼吁对养分管理的过渡进行长期战略规划。未来的政策应考虑替代养分来源的基本制约因素,并强调提高有效养分循环利用和矿物肥料高效使用的能力。本文指出了影响斯里兰卡 2021 年矿物肥料禁令结果的养分供应制约因素,并为未来农业养分管理转型提出了广泛适用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons from the Short-Lived 2021 Fertilizer Import Ban in Sri Lanka Based on Analysis of Nutrient Flows

The Sri Lankan government’s 2021 policy to ban mineral fertilizer imports and shift to green agriculture provides an opportunity to examine the potential for nutrient recycling in a more circular economy. Here, we examined national-level nutrient flows in Sri Lanka to determine the capacity to offset mineral fertilizer with alternative nutrient sources, considering nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Beyond animal manure already applied to croplands, other nutrient sources, including municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and human excreta, have limited potential to offset mineral fertilizer imports. For example, MSW compost and early adoption of nutrient recovery from human excreta could provide N and P equal to only ≤10% of mineral fertilizer use. Furthermore, we used a grid-based resource recovery and distribution model to identify priority areas for the nutrient management transition in Sri Lanka. Reuse of recovered nutrients from MSW compost and human excreta in model scenarios was in urban and peri-urban areas, including home gardens, distant from much of the nation’s agriculture. Our findings reinforce calls for long-term strategic planning for transitions in nutrient management. Future policies should consider fundamental constraints on alternative nutrient sources and emphasize increasing capacity for both effective nutrient recycling and efficient mineral fertilizer use.

This paper identifies constraints on nutrient availability influencing the outcome of Sri Lanka’s controversial 2021 mineral fertilizer ban and makes broadly applicable recommendations for future agricultural nutrient management transitions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信