评估中国家庭的食源性疾病爆发风险:全国猪肉处理方法调查分析。

Shounan Zhang, Yan Qi, Li Bai, Yeru Wang, Jin Xu, Jing Wu, Yibaina Wang
{"title":"评估中国家庭的食源性疾病爆发风险:全国猪肉处理方法调查分析。","authors":"Shounan Zhang, Yan Qi, Li Bai, Yeru Wang, Jin Xu, Jing Wu, Yibaina Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the risk of foodborne outbreaks associated with household food handling practices in China and identify the consumer groups that are at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey of household pork handling practices was conducted in China. The risk of foodborne outbreaks stemming from consumers' improper handling practices was assessed utilizing the Weighted Harmonic Outbreak Prevention Index (WHOPI). The index categorized these practices into three levels of good hygienic practice (GHP): low (WHOPI≤0.35), medium (WHOPI: 0.36-0.70), and high (WHOPI>0.70). Logistic regression analyses were used to identify groups at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2730 households from seven provinces in mainland China were analyzed. Based on WHOPI, only 0.4 % of households demonstrated a high level of GHP, while 55.4 % showed a low level of GHP. The primary non-conforming stage was separation practices, followed by cooking and purchasing practices. Nearly two-thirds of households (64.8 %) didn't have a separate cutting board for raw meat, and 44.9 % of them claimed to use the same board to handle ready-to-eats afterward. Logistic regression indicated more attention is required for those living in southern and rural areas, working in non-public institutions, possessing lower levels of education, and being single or widowed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The household food handling practices of Chinese consumers involve serious food safety risk. Education programs and interventions concerning safe handling practices in households are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94010,"journal":{"name":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","volume":"197 Pt 1","pages":"115264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing foodborne outbreak risk in Chinese households: A national survey analysis of pork handling practices.\",\"authors\":\"Shounan Zhang, Yan Qi, Li Bai, Yeru Wang, Jin Xu, Jing Wu, Yibaina Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the risk of foodborne outbreaks associated with household food handling practices in China and identify the consumer groups that are at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national survey of household pork handling practices was conducted in China. The risk of foodborne outbreaks stemming from consumers' improper handling practices was assessed utilizing the Weighted Harmonic Outbreak Prevention Index (WHOPI). The index categorized these practices into three levels of good hygienic practice (GHP): low (WHOPI≤0.35), medium (WHOPI: 0.36-0.70), and high (WHOPI>0.70). Logistic regression analyses were used to identify groups at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2730 households from seven provinces in mainland China were analyzed. Based on WHOPI, only 0.4 % of households demonstrated a high level of GHP, while 55.4 % showed a low level of GHP. The primary non-conforming stage was separation practices, followed by cooking and purchasing practices. Nearly two-thirds of households (64.8 %) didn't have a separate cutting board for raw meat, and 44.9 % of them claimed to use the same board to handle ready-to-eats afterward. Logistic regression indicated more attention is required for those living in southern and rural areas, working in non-public institutions, possessing lower levels of education, and being single or widowed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The household food handling practices of Chinese consumers involve serious food safety risk. Education programs and interventions concerning safe handling practices in households are urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)\",\"volume\":\"197 Pt 1\",\"pages\":\"115264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估中国与家庭食品处理方式相关的食源性疾病暴发风险,并确定发生食源性疾病暴发风险较高的消费群体:方法:在中国开展了一项全国性的家庭猪肉处理方式调查。方法:在中国开展了一项全国性的家庭猪肉处理方式调查,利用加权谐波疫情预防指数(WHOPI)评估了消费者不当处理方式导致食源性疫情暴发的风险。该指数将良好卫生操作规范(GHP)分为三个等级:低(WHOPI≤0.35)、中(WHOPI:0.36-0.70)和高(WHOPI>0.70)。利用逻辑回归分析确定食源性疾病爆发风险较高的群体:结果:共分析了来自中国大陆 7 个省的 2730 个家庭。根据 WHOPI,只有 0.4% 的家庭显示出较高的 GHP 水平,而 55.4% 的家庭显示出较低的 GHP 水平。不符合标准的主要阶段是分离做法,其次是烹饪和采购做法。近三分之二的家庭(64.8 %)没有单独的砧板来处理生肉,44.9 % 的家庭声称使用同一砧板来处理即食食品。Logistic 回归结果表明,居住在南方和农村地区、在非公立机构工作、教育水平较低、单身或丧偶的消费者需要更加注意:结论:中国消费者的家庭食品处理方式存在严重的食品安全风险。结论:中国消费者的家庭食品处理方式存在严重的食品安全风险,迫切需要开展有关家庭安全处理方式的教育计划和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing foodborne outbreak risk in Chinese households: A national survey analysis of pork handling practices.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the risk of foodborne outbreaks associated with household food handling practices in China and identify the consumer groups that are at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.

Methods: A national survey of household pork handling practices was conducted in China. The risk of foodborne outbreaks stemming from consumers' improper handling practices was assessed utilizing the Weighted Harmonic Outbreak Prevention Index (WHOPI). The index categorized these practices into three levels of good hygienic practice (GHP): low (WHOPI≤0.35), medium (WHOPI: 0.36-0.70), and high (WHOPI>0.70). Logistic regression analyses were used to identify groups at higher risk for foodborne outbreaks.

Results: A total of 2730 households from seven provinces in mainland China were analyzed. Based on WHOPI, only 0.4 % of households demonstrated a high level of GHP, while 55.4 % showed a low level of GHP. The primary non-conforming stage was separation practices, followed by cooking and purchasing practices. Nearly two-thirds of households (64.8 %) didn't have a separate cutting board for raw meat, and 44.9 % of them claimed to use the same board to handle ready-to-eats afterward. Logistic regression indicated more attention is required for those living in southern and rural areas, working in non-public institutions, possessing lower levels of education, and being single or widowed.

Conclusion: The household food handling practices of Chinese consumers involve serious food safety risk. Education programs and interventions concerning safe handling practices in households are urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信