发短信、通话、拖拉和调音:驾车时的风险意识、手机依赖性和不同类型的手机使用行为。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Verity Truelove, Levi Anderson, Steven Love, Tahlia Wyer
{"title":"发短信、通话、拖拉和调音:驾车时的风险意识、手机依赖性和不同类型的手机使用行为。","authors":"Verity Truelove, Levi Anderson, Steven Love, Tahlia Wyer","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2423008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the links between specific types of mobile phone use while driving (MPUWD) behaviors (i.e., reading, writing, talking and using media on a hand-held phone) and risk perceptions (i.e., the perceived risk of legal and non-legal sanctions), as well as to understand the influence that a psychological dependence on phone use might have toward these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a variety of recruitment initiatives, a total of 821 drivers completed an online questionnaire about their phone use behaviors, MPUWD behaviors, and MPUWD risk perceptions. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or over, held a Queensland (Australia) driver's license, and owned a mobile phone device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, a repeated measures ANOVA showed that participants engaged in and perceived each of the four MPUWD behaviors differently. Of note, writing MPUWD behaviors were engaged in the least frequently and perceived as the riskiest, while using media was engaged in the most frequently and perceived as the least risky. Second, cross-tabulations and concurrent chi-square tests showed that there were significant differences in the MPUWD behaviors of pre-defined \"likely dependent\" phone users, compared to \"likely non-dependent\" users. In fact, likely dependent users were up to three times more likely to engage in MPUWD behaviors frequently compared to the latter group. Finally, structural equation modeling indicated that likely phone dependency directly predicted risk perceptions, and indirectly predicted MPUWD behaviors <i>via</i> the effects they had toward risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study have suggested people hold unique perceptions about different types of MPUWD behaviors. It is also suggested that problematic phone use may play a role in not only the engagement in different types of MPUWD, but also the effectiveness of road safety countermeasures aimed at reducing this behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors.\",\"authors\":\"Verity Truelove, Levi Anderson, Steven Love, Tahlia Wyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2024.2423008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the links between specific types of mobile phone use while driving (MPUWD) behaviors (i.e., reading, writing, talking and using media on a hand-held phone) and risk perceptions (i.e., the perceived risk of legal and non-legal sanctions), as well as to understand the influence that a psychological dependence on phone use might have toward these relationships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a variety of recruitment initiatives, a total of 821 drivers completed an online questionnaire about their phone use behaviors, MPUWD behaviors, and MPUWD risk perceptions. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or over, held a Queensland (Australia) driver's license, and owned a mobile phone device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, a repeated measures ANOVA showed that participants engaged in and perceived each of the four MPUWD behaviors differently. Of note, writing MPUWD behaviors were engaged in the least frequently and perceived as the riskiest, while using media was engaged in the most frequently and perceived as the least risky. Second, cross-tabulations and concurrent chi-square tests showed that there were significant differences in the MPUWD behaviors of pre-defined \\\"likely dependent\\\" phone users, compared to \\\"likely non-dependent\\\" users. In fact, likely dependent users were up to three times more likely to engage in MPUWD behaviors frequently compared to the latter group. Finally, structural equation modeling indicated that likely phone dependency directly predicted risk perceptions, and indirectly predicted MPUWD behaviors <i>via</i> the effects they had toward risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study have suggested people hold unique perceptions about different types of MPUWD behaviors. It is also suggested that problematic phone use may play a role in not only the engagement in different types of MPUWD, but also the effectiveness of road safety countermeasures aimed at reducing this behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2423008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2423008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在调查驾驶时使用手机(MPUWD)的具体行为类型(即使用手持手机阅读、书写、通话和使用媒体)与风险感知(即感知到的法律和非法律制裁风险)之间的联系,并了解使用手机的心理依赖对这些关系可能产生的影响:通过各种招募活动,共有 821 名驾驶员完成了关于手机使用行为、MPUWD 行为和 MPUWD 风险感知的在线问卷调查。年龄在18岁或18岁以上、持有昆士兰(澳大利亚)驾照并拥有移动电话设备的人都有资格参加调查:首先,重复测量方差分析显示,参与者对四种 MPUWD 行为的参与和感知各不相同。值得注意的是,书写 MPUWD 行为的参与频率最低,被认为风险最高,而使用媒体的参与频率最高,被认为风险最低。其次,交叉分析和同时进行的卡方检验表明,与 "可能不依赖 "手机用户相比,"可能依赖 "手机用户的 MPUWD 行为存在显著差异。事实上,与 "非依赖型 "用户相比,"可能依赖型 "用户经常实施 MPUWD 行为的可能性要高出三倍。最后,结构方程模型表明,手机依赖性直接预测风险认知,并通过对风险认知的影响间接预测 MPUWD 行为:本研究的结果表明,人们对不同类型的 MPUWD 行为持有独特的看法。结论:本研究结果表明,人们对不同类型的 MPUWD 行为持有独特的看法,同时还表明,有问题的手机使用不仅会影响人们参与不同类型的 MPUWD 行为,还会影响旨在减少这种行为的道路安全对策的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the links between specific types of mobile phone use while driving (MPUWD) behaviors (i.e., reading, writing, talking and using media on a hand-held phone) and risk perceptions (i.e., the perceived risk of legal and non-legal sanctions), as well as to understand the influence that a psychological dependence on phone use might have toward these relationships.

Methods: Using a variety of recruitment initiatives, a total of 821 drivers completed an online questionnaire about their phone use behaviors, MPUWD behaviors, and MPUWD risk perceptions. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or over, held a Queensland (Australia) driver's license, and owned a mobile phone device.

Results: First, a repeated measures ANOVA showed that participants engaged in and perceived each of the four MPUWD behaviors differently. Of note, writing MPUWD behaviors were engaged in the least frequently and perceived as the riskiest, while using media was engaged in the most frequently and perceived as the least risky. Second, cross-tabulations and concurrent chi-square tests showed that there were significant differences in the MPUWD behaviors of pre-defined "likely dependent" phone users, compared to "likely non-dependent" users. In fact, likely dependent users were up to three times more likely to engage in MPUWD behaviors frequently compared to the latter group. Finally, structural equation modeling indicated that likely phone dependency directly predicted risk perceptions, and indirectly predicted MPUWD behaviors via the effects they had toward risk perceptions.

Conclusions: The findings of this study have suggested people hold unique perceptions about different types of MPUWD behaviors. It is also suggested that problematic phone use may play a role in not only the engagement in different types of MPUWD, but also the effectiveness of road safety countermeasures aimed at reducing this behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信