灵长类动物悬挂适应性的系统发育比较分析。

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jeffrey K. Spear
{"title":"灵长类动物悬挂适应性的系统发育比较分析。","authors":"Jeffrey K. Spear","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The evolution of suspensory locomotion in primates has been of great interest to biological anthropologists since the early 20th century due to the contentious hypothesis that suspension in hominoids may have been a preadaptation for bipedalism. Studies of fossil hominoids regularly look for traits (or lack thereof) indicative of suspension, but many fossils exhibit potentially confusing mosaics of traits, and there is ongoing debate regarding whether certain traits are truly associated with suspension or whether they might more accurately represent allometric trends, developmental byproducts, or adaptation to cautious climbing. Here, I test the association between 27 morphological traits and forelimb suspension in extant primates using phylogenetically informed comparative methods, a broad comparative sample (nearly 1500 individuals representing 74 genera), and a systematic review of behavioral literature. I find that clavicle length, olecranon length, mediolateral scapula breadth (but not craniocaudal height), and glenoid and scapula spine angle are all strongly associated with suspension. The association is strongest for clavicle and olecranon lengths when the ‘suspensory’ category is highly exclusive, whereas it is strongest for scapula breadth, glenoid angle, and spine angle when the category is highly inclusive (i.e., also including taxa that use only limited amounts of suspension). Humeral head height above the greater tuberosity appears to be associated with nonquadrupedal locomotion generally rather than suspension specifically. Insertions for the biceps and deltoid muscles are significantly more distal in suspensory taxa only when size-standardized by a body size proxy, not when standardized by the length of the load arm. Overall, a majority of hypothesized traits are not actually associated with suspension in a phylogenetic comparative context. Morphological adaptations that do characterize suspension are expressed in a mosaic fashion that depends on the degree of suspension practiced, other behaviors used, and evolutionary history. Most of these traits may be related to an enhanced range of motion at the shoulder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 103616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic comparative analysis of suspensory adaptations in primates\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey K. Spear\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The evolution of suspensory locomotion in primates has been of great interest to biological anthropologists since the early 20th century due to the contentious hypothesis that suspension in hominoids may have been a preadaptation for bipedalism. Studies of fossil hominoids regularly look for traits (or lack thereof) indicative of suspension, but many fossils exhibit potentially confusing mosaics of traits, and there is ongoing debate regarding whether certain traits are truly associated with suspension or whether they might more accurately represent allometric trends, developmental byproducts, or adaptation to cautious climbing. Here, I test the association between 27 morphological traits and forelimb suspension in extant primates using phylogenetically informed comparative methods, a broad comparative sample (nearly 1500 individuals representing 74 genera), and a systematic review of behavioral literature. I find that clavicle length, olecranon length, mediolateral scapula breadth (but not craniocaudal height), and glenoid and scapula spine angle are all strongly associated with suspension. The association is strongest for clavicle and olecranon lengths when the ‘suspensory’ category is highly exclusive, whereas it is strongest for scapula breadth, glenoid angle, and spine angle when the category is highly inclusive (i.e., also including taxa that use only limited amounts of suspension). Humeral head height above the greater tuberosity appears to be associated with nonquadrupedal locomotion generally rather than suspension specifically. Insertions for the biceps and deltoid muscles are significantly more distal in suspensory taxa only when size-standardized by a body size proxy, not when standardized by the length of the load arm. Overall, a majority of hypothesized traits are not actually associated with suspension in a phylogenetic comparative context. Morphological adaptations that do characterize suspension are expressed in a mosaic fashion that depends on the degree of suspension practiced, other behaviors used, and evolutionary history. Most of these traits may be related to an enhanced range of motion at the shoulder.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424001246\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248424001246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪初以来,灵长类动物悬挂运动的进化一直是生物人类学家非常感兴趣的问题,因为有一种有争议的假说认为,悬挂运动在类人猿中可能是对两足运动的预先适应。对同类化石的研究经常寻找表明悬挂的特征(或缺乏悬挂的特征),但许多化石表现出可能令人困惑的混合特征,而且关于某些特征是否真的与悬挂有关,或者它们是否更准确地代表了异速趋势、发育副产品或对谨慎攀爬的适应,一直存在争论。在这里,我使用系统发育比较方法、广泛的比较样本(代表 74 个属的近 1500 个个体)以及对行为文献的系统回顾,检验了现存灵长类动物 27 个形态特征与前肢悬垂性之间的关联。我发现,锁骨长度、肩胛骨长度、肩胛骨内外侧宽度(但不包括颅尾高度)以及盂骨和肩胛骨脊柱角度都与悬挂密切相关。当 "悬吊 "类别具有高度排他性时,锁骨和肩胛骨长度的相关性最强,而当该类别具有高度包容性时(即也包括仅使用有限悬吊的类群),肩胛骨宽度、盂角和脊柱角度的相关性最强。大结节上方的肱骨头高度似乎与一般的非四足运动而非具体的悬挂运动有关。在悬挂类群中,肱二头肌和三角肌的插入点明显更远,只有在以体型为标准时才是如此,而不是以负重臂的长度为标准时。总之,在系统发育的比较背景下,大多数假定的特征实际上与悬挂无关。确实是悬浮特征的形态适应性是以一种镶嵌的方式表现出来的,这取决于所实行的悬浮程度、所使用的其他行为以及进化历史。这些特征中的大多数可能与肩部活动范围的增大有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phylogenetic comparative analysis of suspensory adaptations in primates
The evolution of suspensory locomotion in primates has been of great interest to biological anthropologists since the early 20th century due to the contentious hypothesis that suspension in hominoids may have been a preadaptation for bipedalism. Studies of fossil hominoids regularly look for traits (or lack thereof) indicative of suspension, but many fossils exhibit potentially confusing mosaics of traits, and there is ongoing debate regarding whether certain traits are truly associated with suspension or whether they might more accurately represent allometric trends, developmental byproducts, or adaptation to cautious climbing. Here, I test the association between 27 morphological traits and forelimb suspension in extant primates using phylogenetically informed comparative methods, a broad comparative sample (nearly 1500 individuals representing 74 genera), and a systematic review of behavioral literature. I find that clavicle length, olecranon length, mediolateral scapula breadth (but not craniocaudal height), and glenoid and scapula spine angle are all strongly associated with suspension. The association is strongest for clavicle and olecranon lengths when the ‘suspensory’ category is highly exclusive, whereas it is strongest for scapula breadth, glenoid angle, and spine angle when the category is highly inclusive (i.e., also including taxa that use only limited amounts of suspension). Humeral head height above the greater tuberosity appears to be associated with nonquadrupedal locomotion generally rather than suspension specifically. Insertions for the biceps and deltoid muscles are significantly more distal in suspensory taxa only when size-standardized by a body size proxy, not when standardized by the length of the load arm. Overall, a majority of hypothesized traits are not actually associated with suspension in a phylogenetic comparative context. Morphological adaptations that do characterize suspension are expressed in a mosaic fashion that depends on the degree of suspension practiced, other behaviors used, and evolutionary history. Most of these traits may be related to an enhanced range of motion at the shoulder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信