Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland
{"title":"满足跨专业临床遗传学教育需求。","authors":"Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Cross-Specialty Clinical Genetics Education Needs.\",\"authors\":\"Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.
Methods: Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.
Results: Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.
Discussion: This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.