满足跨专业临床遗传学教育需求。

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland
{"title":"满足跨专业临床遗传学教育需求。","authors":"Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Cross-Specialty Clinical Genetics Education Needs.\",\"authors\":\"Karla J Lindquist, Matthew J Ryan, Maren T Scheuner, Bani Tamraz, Elena Flowers, Julie Harris-Wai, Sawona Biswas, Katherine Hyland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:基因组学的进步正在改变临床实践,但遗传学专业人员太少,无法满足日益增长的需求。此外,许多非遗传学临床医生认为自己没有做好将遗传学融入临床实践的准备。本研究评估了一家学术机构中临床医生尚未满足的基因组学教育需求:方法:通过对部门和科室领导的定性访谈,向该机构的所有临床医生发放调查问卷。调查问题主要涉及遗传学和基因组学方面的当前实践、信心以及所需的教育资源。采用描述性统计和费雪精确检验对数据进行了分析。调查结果与遗传学-基因组学冠军专家小组共享,以帮助满足各专业的教育需求:在 215 名调查对象中,72% 是教职员工,24% 是受训人员,4% 是临床工作人员,代表 18 个科室。只有不到一半的人对在临床中使用遗传学有信心。约 81% 的受访者希望获得更多培训,但不同角色(P = 0.27)或科室(P = 0.98)的受访者希望获得的培训不尽相同。遗传学-基因组学冠军建议通过电子会诊、在线材料和科室会议提供及时的内容:本研究强调了临床医生对更多遗传学培训的需求和愿望。讨论:本研究强调了临床医生对更多遗传学培训的需求和愿望,同时也强调了咨询精通遗传学的临床医生以确定应对跨专科遗传学教育需求的挑战和解决方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing Cross-Specialty Clinical Genetics Education Needs.

Introduction: Advances in genomics are transforming clinical practice, but there are too few genetics professionals to meet increasing demand. Moreover, many nongeneticist clinicians feel unprepared to incorporate genetics into practice. This study assessed clinicians' unmet genomics educational needs at a single academic institution.

Methods: Qualitative interviews with Department and Division leaders informed a survey distributed to all clinicians at the institution. Survey questions focused on current practices, confidence, and desired educational resources around genetics and genomics. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher exact tests. Results were shared with an expert panel of Genetics-Genomics Champions to help meet educational needs across specialties.

Results: Of the 215 survey respondents, 72% were faculty, 24% were trainees, and 4% were clinical staff, representing 18 departments. Less than half felt confident using genetics in the clinic. About 81% desired more training, which did not differ by role ( P = .27) or department ( P = .98). The Genetics-Genomics Champions proposed delivering just-in-time content via e-consults, online materials, and departmental meetings.

Discussion: This study highlights clinicians' need and desire for more genetics training. It also underscores the importance of consulting genetics-savvy clinicians to identify challenges and solutions for addressing cross-specialty genetics education needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信