评估用于巴西青少年的数字健康素养工具(DHLI-BrA)的心理测量特性。

3区 综合性期刊
Mariane Carolina Faria Barbosa, Ana Luiza Peres Baldiotti, Ramon Targino Firmino, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia, Fernanda de Morais Ferreira
{"title":"评估用于巴西青少年的数字健康素养工具(DHLI-BrA)的心理测量特性。","authors":"Mariane Carolina Faria Barbosa, Ana Luiza Peres Baldiotti, Ramon Targino Firmino, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia, Fernanda de Morais Ferreira","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21111458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Brazilian Adolescents (DHLI-BrA). Two hundred and sixty Brazilian adolescents answered the DHLI-BrA and the Brazilian version of quality-of-life and health literacy instruments: WHOQOL-Bref, eHEALS-BrA, NVS-BR, and REALMD-20. Then, they answered a questionnaire on sociodemographics, health, Internet access, and digital health aspects. The data collection was conducted between September and December of 2022.The statistical test assessed internal consistency, stability, discriminant and convergent validities, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory (IRT) analysis using 2PL was applied to performance-based DHLI-BrA. The DHLI-BrA self-reported questions demonstrated almost perfect internal consistency (α and ω = 0.83) and good stability (ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of six factors (χ<sup>2</sup> = 229.173 (df = 174, <i>p</i> = 0.003), CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.035, and RMSR = 0.047). The performance-based DHLI-BrA demonstrated moderate internal consistency (α = 0.57 and KR20 = 0.56) and good stability (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of a single factor (χ<sup>2</sup> = 17.901 (df = 14, <i>p</i> = 0.2113), CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.033, and RMSR = 0.038). IRT analyses revealed item discrimination ranging from -0.71 to 1.83 and difficulty from -1.53 to 1.02. Convergent validity of the self-reported DHLI-BrA was obtained by its correlation with the eHEALS-BrA (r = 0.45) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.19), besides the performance-based DHLI-BrA with its correlation with the NVS (r = 0.47) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.44). The DHLI-BrA demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to measure the self-reported, performance-based digital health literacy of Brazilian typically developing adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI-BrA) for Use in Brazilian Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Mariane Carolina Faria Barbosa, Ana Luiza Peres Baldiotti, Ramon Targino Firmino, Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia, Fernanda de Morais Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijerph21111458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Brazilian Adolescents (DHLI-BrA). Two hundred and sixty Brazilian adolescents answered the DHLI-BrA and the Brazilian version of quality-of-life and health literacy instruments: WHOQOL-Bref, eHEALS-BrA, NVS-BR, and REALMD-20. Then, they answered a questionnaire on sociodemographics, health, Internet access, and digital health aspects. The data collection was conducted between September and December of 2022.The statistical test assessed internal consistency, stability, discriminant and convergent validities, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory (IRT) analysis using 2PL was applied to performance-based DHLI-BrA. The DHLI-BrA self-reported questions demonstrated almost perfect internal consistency (α and ω = 0.83) and good stability (ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of six factors (χ<sup>2</sup> = 229.173 (df = 174, <i>p</i> = 0.003), CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.035, and RMSR = 0.047). The performance-based DHLI-BrA demonstrated moderate internal consistency (α = 0.57 and KR20 = 0.56) and good stability (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of a single factor (χ<sup>2</sup> = 17.901 (df = 14, <i>p</i> = 0.2113), CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.033, and RMSR = 0.038). IRT analyses revealed item discrimination ranging from -0.71 to 1.83 and difficulty from -1.53 to 1.02. Convergent validity of the self-reported DHLI-BrA was obtained by its correlation with the eHEALS-BrA (r = 0.45) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.19), besides the performance-based DHLI-BrA with its correlation with the NVS (r = 0.47) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.44). The DHLI-BrA demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to measure the self-reported, performance-based digital health literacy of Brazilian typically developing adolescents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了葡萄牙语版《巴西青少年数字健康素养问卷》(DHLI-BrA)的心理测量特性。260名巴西青少年回答了DHLI-BrA以及巴西版生活质量和健康素养工具的问题:WHOQOL-Bref、eHEALS-BrA、NVS-BR 和 REALMD-20。然后,他们回答了一份关于社会人口统计学、健康、互联网接入和数字健康方面的问卷。数据收集工作于 2022 年 9 月至 12 月期间进行。统计检验包括内部一致性、稳定性、判别效度和收敛效度、探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)。基于表现的 DHLI-BrA 采用了 2PL 项目反应理论(IRT)分析。DHLI-BrA 自我报告问题显示出几乎完美的内部一致性(α 和 ω = 0.83)和良好的稳定性(ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95)。在 EFA 和 CFA 中,最佳调整模型由六个因子组成(χ2 = 229.173 (df = 174, p = 0.003),CFI = 0.944,TLI = 0.933,RMSEA = 0.035,RMSR = 0.047)。基于表现的 DHLI-BrA 显示出中等程度的内部一致性(α = 0.57 和 KR20 = 0.56)和良好的稳定性(ICC = 0.86,95% CI:0.76-0.92)。在 EFA 和 CFA 中,最佳调整模型由一个因素组成(χ2 = 17.901 (df = 14, p = 0.2113),CFI = 0.952,TLI = 0.927,RMSEA = 0.033,RMSR = 0.038)。IRT分析显示,项目区分度为-0.71至1.83,难度为-1.53至1.02。自我报告的DHLI-BrA与eHEALS-BrA(r = 0.45)和REALMD-20(r = 0.19)存在相关性,而基于表现的DHLI-BrA与NVS(r = 0.47)和REALMD-20(r = 0.44)也存在相关性。DHLI-BrA具有充分的心理测量特性,可用于测量巴西典型发育青少年自我报告的、基于表现的数字健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI-BrA) for Use in Brazilian Adolescents.

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Brazilian Adolescents (DHLI-BrA). Two hundred and sixty Brazilian adolescents answered the DHLI-BrA and the Brazilian version of quality-of-life and health literacy instruments: WHOQOL-Bref, eHEALS-BrA, NVS-BR, and REALMD-20. Then, they answered a questionnaire on sociodemographics, health, Internet access, and digital health aspects. The data collection was conducted between September and December of 2022.The statistical test assessed internal consistency, stability, discriminant and convergent validities, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory (IRT) analysis using 2PL was applied to performance-based DHLI-BrA. The DHLI-BrA self-reported questions demonstrated almost perfect internal consistency (α and ω = 0.83) and good stability (ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of six factors (χ2 = 229.173 (df = 174, p = 0.003), CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.035, and RMSR = 0.047). The performance-based DHLI-BrA demonstrated moderate internal consistency (α = 0.57 and KR20 = 0.56) and good stability (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of a single factor (χ2 = 17.901 (df = 14, p = 0.2113), CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.033, and RMSR = 0.038). IRT analyses revealed item discrimination ranging from -0.71 to 1.83 and difficulty from -1.53 to 1.02. Convergent validity of the self-reported DHLI-BrA was obtained by its correlation with the eHEALS-BrA (r = 0.45) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.19), besides the performance-based DHLI-BrA with its correlation with the NVS (r = 0.47) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.44). The DHLI-BrA demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to measure the self-reported, performance-based digital health literacy of Brazilian typically developing adolescents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信