非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术重新分期的理论依据。

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_50_24
Amit Sharma, R T Raghavendra, Deepak Biswal, Pradhuman Yadav, Saryu Goel, Satyadeo Sharma
{"title":"非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术重新分期的理论依据。","authors":"Amit Sharma, R T Raghavendra, Deepak Biswal, Pradhuman Yadav, Saryu Goel, Satyadeo Sharma","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_50_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present retrospective data of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (Re-TURBT) at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Records of all NMIBC patients undergoing Re-TURBT between March 2021 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were risk stratified based on TURBT pathology. Re-TURBT was performed between 4 and 6 weeks. Adverse features such as number, size, and appearance were noted. Patients with persistent disease at Re-TURBT were counseled for early cystectomy with urinary diversion or intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). In case of disease upstaging, patients were counseled for radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight NMIBC patients (30 males and 8 females) underwent Re-TURBT. Six patients had residual/persistent disease at 6 weeks, all high risk and high grade (HG, <i>P</i> value not significant, <i>P</i> = 0.31). There was no association with number and appearance of tumors with residual/persistence at 6 weeks. The mean lesion size on imaging in cases with and without residual disease was 3.32 ± 0.86 versus 3.39 ± 0.92 cm, respectively, <i>P</i> value not significant (0.868). There was no residual disease in the low-grade (LG) pT1 group, but HG pTa and pT1 (<i>n</i> = 3) had residual disease. Four HG pT1 patients opted for early cystectomy. Two patients each had pT0 and two pT2. At 3 months of follow-up, urethral strictures were seen both in high risk and intermediate risk. Among four patients who had stricture, meatal stenosis was common (50%, <i>n</i> = 2). Two patients had long-segment stricture requiring perineal urethrostomy with stage I Johannsen repair. All HG pT1 lesion patients eventually underwent cystectomy (3 were under staged and two treated completely with TURBT, one with TURBT + BCG and one patient progressed to metastasis).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-TURBT is essential for the management of HG pTa and HG pT1 lesions for accurate staging and treatment of residual disease. However, LG pT1 patients can safely be excluded from Re-TURBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"16 4","pages":"288-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale of restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in the current era.\",\"authors\":\"Amit Sharma, R T Raghavendra, Deepak Biswal, Pradhuman Yadav, Saryu Goel, Satyadeo Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ua.ua_50_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present retrospective data of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (Re-TURBT) at a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Records of all NMIBC patients undergoing Re-TURBT between March 2021 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were risk stratified based on TURBT pathology. Re-TURBT was performed between 4 and 6 weeks. Adverse features such as number, size, and appearance were noted. Patients with persistent disease at Re-TURBT were counseled for early cystectomy with urinary diversion or intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). In case of disease upstaging, patients were counseled for radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight NMIBC patients (30 males and 8 females) underwent Re-TURBT. Six patients had residual/persistent disease at 6 weeks, all high risk and high grade (HG, <i>P</i> value not significant, <i>P</i> = 0.31). There was no association with number and appearance of tumors with residual/persistence at 6 weeks. The mean lesion size on imaging in cases with and without residual disease was 3.32 ± 0.86 versus 3.39 ± 0.92 cm, respectively, <i>P</i> value not significant (0.868). There was no residual disease in the low-grade (LG) pT1 group, but HG pTa and pT1 (<i>n</i> = 3) had residual disease. Four HG pT1 patients opted for early cystectomy. Two patients each had pT0 and two pT2. At 3 months of follow-up, urethral strictures were seen both in high risk and intermediate risk. Among four patients who had stricture, meatal stenosis was common (50%, <i>n</i> = 2). Two patients had long-segment stricture requiring perineal urethrostomy with stage I Johannsen repair. All HG pT1 lesion patients eventually underwent cystectomy (3 were under staged and two treated completely with TURBT, one with TURBT + BCG and one patient progressed to metastasis).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-TURBT is essential for the management of HG pTa and HG pT1 lesions for accurate staging and treatment of residual disease. However, LG pT1 patients can safely be excluded from Re-TURBT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Annals\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"288-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_50_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_50_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们提供了在一家三级医疗中心接受再分期经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(Re-TURBT)的非肌浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者的回顾性数据:回顾性分析了2021年3月至2023年9月期间接受Re-TURBT手术的所有NMIBC患者的记录。根据TURBT病理学对患者进行了风险分层。再TURBT在4至6周之间进行。记录了不良特征,如数量、大小和外观。对再次进行 TURBT 时病情仍未缓解的患者,建议其尽早进行膀胱切除术,同时进行尿路改道或膀胱内卡介苗(BCG)注射。如果病情进一步恶化,则建议患者进行根治性膀胱切除术:38名NMIBC患者(30男8女)接受了Re-TURBT治疗。6名患者在6周时出现残留/持续性疾病,均为高危和高级别(HG,P值不显著,P = 0.31)。肿瘤的数量和外观与6周时的残留/存留没有关系。有残留病灶和无残留病灶病例的影像学平均病灶大小分别为 3.32 ± 0.86 厘米和 3.39 ± 0.92 厘米,P 值无显著性差异(0.868)。低级别(LG)pT1 组没有残留病灶,但 HG pTa 和 pT1(n = 3)有残留病灶。4 名 HG pT1 患者选择了早期膀胱切除术。pT0 和 pT2 患者各两名。在 3 个月的随访中,高危和中危患者都出现了尿道狭窄。在四名尿道狭窄患者中,肉腔狭窄很常见(50%,n = 2)。两名患者出现了长段尿道狭窄,需要进行会阴尿道造口术和 I 期约翰森修补术。所有HG pT1病变患者最终都接受了膀胱切除术(3例患者分期不足,2例患者完全接受了TURBT治疗,1例患者接受了TURBT+卡介苗治疗,1例患者进展为转移):结论:对 HG pTa 和 HG pT1 病变进行再 TURBT 治疗对于准确分期和治疗残余疾病至关重要。然而,LG pT1 患者可以安全地排除在 Re-TURBT 治疗之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationale of restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in the current era.

Background: We present retrospective data of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (Re-TURBT) at a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: Records of all NMIBC patients undergoing Re-TURBT between March 2021 and September 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were risk stratified based on TURBT pathology. Re-TURBT was performed between 4 and 6 weeks. Adverse features such as number, size, and appearance were noted. Patients with persistent disease at Re-TURBT were counseled for early cystectomy with urinary diversion or intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). In case of disease upstaging, patients were counseled for radical cystectomy.

Results: Thirty-eight NMIBC patients (30 males and 8 females) underwent Re-TURBT. Six patients had residual/persistent disease at 6 weeks, all high risk and high grade (HG, P value not significant, P = 0.31). There was no association with number and appearance of tumors with residual/persistence at 6 weeks. The mean lesion size on imaging in cases with and without residual disease was 3.32 ± 0.86 versus 3.39 ± 0.92 cm, respectively, P value not significant (0.868). There was no residual disease in the low-grade (LG) pT1 group, but HG pTa and pT1 (n = 3) had residual disease. Four HG pT1 patients opted for early cystectomy. Two patients each had pT0 and two pT2. At 3 months of follow-up, urethral strictures were seen both in high risk and intermediate risk. Among four patients who had stricture, meatal stenosis was common (50%, n = 2). Two patients had long-segment stricture requiring perineal urethrostomy with stage I Johannsen repair. All HG pT1 lesion patients eventually underwent cystectomy (3 were under staged and two treated completely with TURBT, one with TURBT + BCG and one patient progressed to metastasis).

Conclusion: Re-TURBT is essential for the management of HG pTa and HG pT1 lesions for accurate staging and treatment of residual disease. However, LG pT1 patients can safely be excluded from Re-TURBT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信