1 岁以下儿童逆行肾内手术的可行性、有效性和安全性:单中心经验。

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_119_23
Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Hemnath Anandan, Paidakula Ramakrishna, P M Siddalinga Swamy, Soundarya Ganesan, Rakesh Panda
{"title":"1 岁以下儿童逆行肾内手术的可行性、有效性和安全性:单中心经验。","authors":"Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Hemnath Anandan, Paidakula Ramakrishna, P M Siddalinga Swamy, Soundarya Ganesan, Rakesh Panda","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_119_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Urolithiasis in infants is uncommon. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the management options. RIRS is the least studied of these options in infants. In our series of 23 cases, we aim to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of RIRS in <1-year age group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a series of 23 infants who underwent RIRS in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021. Children who were <12 months of age and had the largest stone size of <20 mm were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (male - 15; female - 8) were included in the study. The mean age was 10 ± 2.31 months (range, 4-12 months). The mean stone size was 11.6 ± 2.96 mm (range, 7.5-19 mm). The mean operative time was 29.44 ± 7.45 min (range, 17-42 min). Six patients (22.2%) had mild hematuria (Clavien I), and seven patients (25.9%) had postoperative fever. Stone size had a significant positive correlation with laser time, operative time, and intraoperative intravasation, but no significant association with stone-free rate. At 2-month follow-up, 4 (three patients) out of 27 renal units had residual stones (stone-free rate [SFR] - 85.1%). No patient had long-term complications like urethral or ureteric stricture or stone recurrence during the given follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIRS is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for renal stones in infants with acceptable SFRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"16 4","pages":"270-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Hemnath Anandan, Paidakula Ramakrishna, P M Siddalinga Swamy, Soundarya Ganesan, Rakesh Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ua.ua_119_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Urolithiasis in infants is uncommon. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the management options. RIRS is the least studied of these options in infants. In our series of 23 cases, we aim to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of RIRS in <1-year age group.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a series of 23 infants who underwent RIRS in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021. Children who were <12 months of age and had the largest stone size of <20 mm were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (male - 15; female - 8) were included in the study. The mean age was 10 ± 2.31 months (range, 4-12 months). The mean stone size was 11.6 ± 2.96 mm (range, 7.5-19 mm). The mean operative time was 29.44 ± 7.45 min (range, 17-42 min). Six patients (22.2%) had mild hematuria (Clavien I), and seven patients (25.9%) had postoperative fever. Stone size had a significant positive correlation with laser time, operative time, and intraoperative intravasation, but no significant association with stone-free rate. At 2-month follow-up, 4 (three patients) out of 27 renal units had residual stones (stone-free rate [SFR] - 85.1%). No patient had long-term complications like urethral or ureteric stricture or stone recurrence during the given follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RIRS is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for renal stones in infants with acceptable SFRs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Annals\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"270-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_119_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_119_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:婴儿尿路结石并不常见。治疗方法包括经皮肾镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)。其中,逆行肾内手术对婴儿的研究最少。在我们的 23 例系列研究中,我们旨在评估 RIRS 在婴儿中的可行性、有效性和安全性:这是对 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月在我院接受 RIRS 的 23 例婴儿的系列回顾性分析。的患儿:23例患者(男-15例;女-8例)被纳入研究。平均年龄为 10±2.31 个月(范围为 4-12 个月)。结石平均大小为 11.6 ± 2.96 毫米(范围为 7.5-19 毫米)。平均手术时间为(29.44±7.45)分钟(17-42分钟不等)。六名患者(22.2%)出现轻度血尿(Clavien I),七名患者(25.9%)术后发烧。结石大小与激光时间、手术时间和术中出血量呈显著正相关,但与无结石率无显著关联。在两个月的随访中,27 个肾单位中有 4 个(3 名患者)有残余结石(无结石率 [SFR] - 85.1%)。在随访期间,没有患者出现尿道或输尿管狭窄或结石复发等长期并发症:结论:RIRS 是一种可行的微创婴儿肾结石治疗方法,无石率可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.

Purpose: Urolithiasis in infants is uncommon. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the management options. RIRS is the least studied of these options in infants. In our series of 23 cases, we aim to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of RIRS in <1-year age group.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a series of 23 infants who underwent RIRS in our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021. Children who were <12 months of age and had the largest stone size of <20 mm were included in the study.

Results: Twenty-three patients (male - 15; female - 8) were included in the study. The mean age was 10 ± 2.31 months (range, 4-12 months). The mean stone size was 11.6 ± 2.96 mm (range, 7.5-19 mm). The mean operative time was 29.44 ± 7.45 min (range, 17-42 min). Six patients (22.2%) had mild hematuria (Clavien I), and seven patients (25.9%) had postoperative fever. Stone size had a significant positive correlation with laser time, operative time, and intraoperative intravasation, but no significant association with stone-free rate. At 2-month follow-up, 4 (three patients) out of 27 renal units had residual stones (stone-free rate [SFR] - 85.1%). No patient had long-term complications like urethral or ureteric stricture or stone recurrence during the given follow-up period.

Conclusion: RIRS is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for renal stones in infants with acceptable SFRs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信