利用生命周期评估方法评估城市垃圾焚烧发电技术对环境的影响。

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.3390/toxics12110786
Yiting Luo, Mingqiang Ye, Yihui Zhou, Rongkui Su, Shunhong Huang, Hangqing Wang, Xiangrong Dai
{"title":"利用生命周期评估方法评估城市垃圾焚烧发电技术对环境的影响。","authors":"Yiting Luo, Mingqiang Ye, Yihui Zhou, Rongkui Su, Shunhong Huang, Hangqing Wang, Xiangrong Dai","doi":"10.3390/toxics12110786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The life cycle assessment methodology is a comprehensive environmental impact evaluation approach rooted in the \"cradle-to-grave\" concept. This study takes a municipal solid waste incineration power plant in central China as an example to comprehensively explore the potential ecological and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste incineration power generation through life cycle assessment methods. Burning one ton of waste can recover 7342 joules of thermal energy. Compared with traditional landfill, incineration can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 30%, with a potential global warming impact of -0.69 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Amongst environmental impacts, land, freshwater, and marine ecosystems possess the greatest potential toxicity, followed by the harmful effects on human health and the influence of ozone-producing photochemical pollution. Lastly, there comes terrestrial acidification, whereas other types of effects can be relatively disregarded in comparison. In the process of waste incineration power generation, the potential impacts of global warming, ionizing radiation, and fossil resource scarcity are less than zero, indicating that this is an environmentally friendly process. In response to the above-mentioned environmental impacts, it is necessary to pay attention to improving incineration efficiency, optimizing leachate treatment, reducing coal use, and controlling acidic gas emissions in the process of urban solid waste incineration power generation. This research offers insights into advancing environmentally sustainable technologies for utilizing waste as an energy resource.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Environmental Impact of Municipal Waste on Energy Incineration Technology for Power Generation Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Yiting Luo, Mingqiang Ye, Yihui Zhou, Rongkui Su, Shunhong Huang, Hangqing Wang, Xiangrong Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxics12110786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The life cycle assessment methodology is a comprehensive environmental impact evaluation approach rooted in the \\\"cradle-to-grave\\\" concept. This study takes a municipal solid waste incineration power plant in central China as an example to comprehensively explore the potential ecological and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste incineration power generation through life cycle assessment methods. Burning one ton of waste can recover 7342 joules of thermal energy. Compared with traditional landfill, incineration can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 30%, with a potential global warming impact of -0.69 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Amongst environmental impacts, land, freshwater, and marine ecosystems possess the greatest potential toxicity, followed by the harmful effects on human health and the influence of ozone-producing photochemical pollution. Lastly, there comes terrestrial acidification, whereas other types of effects can be relatively disregarded in comparison. In the process of waste incineration power generation, the potential impacts of global warming, ionizing radiation, and fossil resource scarcity are less than zero, indicating that this is an environmentally friendly process. In response to the above-mentioned environmental impacts, it is necessary to pay attention to improving incineration efficiency, optimizing leachate treatment, reducing coal use, and controlling acidic gas emissions in the process of urban solid waste incineration power generation. This research offers insights into advancing environmentally sustainable technologies for utilizing waste as an energy resource.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxics\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11597989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12110786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12110786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命周期评估方法是一种植根于 "从摇篮到坟墓 "理念的综合环境影响评价方法。本研究以华中某城市固体废弃物焚烧发电厂为例,通过生命周期评价方法,全面探讨城市固体废弃物焚烧发电对生态环境的潜在影响。焚烧一吨垃圾可回收热能 7342 焦耳。与传统填埋相比,焚烧可减少约 30% 的温室气体排放,对全球变暖的潜在影响为-0.69 千克二氧化碳当量。在对环境的影响中,陆地、淡水和海洋生态系统的潜在毒性最大,其次是对人类健康的有害影响和产生臭氧的光化学污染的影响。最后是陆地酸化,相对而言,其他类型的影响可以忽略不计。在垃圾焚烧发电的过程中,全球变暖、电离辐射、化石资源匮乏等潜在影响小于零,说明这是一个环境友好型的过程。针对上述环境影响,在城市固体废弃物焚烧发电过程中需要注意提高焚烧效率、优化渗滤液处理、减少煤炭使用、控制酸性气体排放等。这项研究为推进环境可持续技术,将垃圾作为能源资源加以利用提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Environmental Impact of Municipal Waste on Energy Incineration Technology for Power Generation Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology.

The life cycle assessment methodology is a comprehensive environmental impact evaluation approach rooted in the "cradle-to-grave" concept. This study takes a municipal solid waste incineration power plant in central China as an example to comprehensively explore the potential ecological and environmental impacts of municipal solid waste incineration power generation through life cycle assessment methods. Burning one ton of waste can recover 7342 joules of thermal energy. Compared with traditional landfill, incineration can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 30%, with a potential global warming impact of -0.69 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Amongst environmental impacts, land, freshwater, and marine ecosystems possess the greatest potential toxicity, followed by the harmful effects on human health and the influence of ozone-producing photochemical pollution. Lastly, there comes terrestrial acidification, whereas other types of effects can be relatively disregarded in comparison. In the process of waste incineration power generation, the potential impacts of global warming, ionizing radiation, and fossil resource scarcity are less than zero, indicating that this is an environmentally friendly process. In response to the above-mentioned environmental impacts, it is necessary to pay attention to improving incineration efficiency, optimizing leachate treatment, reducing coal use, and controlling acidic gas emissions in the process of urban solid waste incineration power generation. This research offers insights into advancing environmentally sustainable technologies for utilizing waste as an energy resource.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信