{"title":"关于在现代中风研究中如实报告 \"成功率 \"的重要见解:一个警世故事。","authors":"Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Marc Ribo","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2015, several trials confirmed the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. These findings revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment and established mechanical thrombectomy as a standard of care. Subsequent studies have further validated that optimal clinical outcomes are closely associated with achieving higher grades of complete reperfusion and minimizing the number of retrieval attempts. As a result, in recent years, the field has seen a growing trend of publications aggressively pursuing the highest rates of angiographic success. This trend is further exacerbated by the proliferation of impressive individual case reports shared on social media platforms, often devoid of significant scientific merit or educational value. We aim to review the potential biases in authors, which may incur when reporting recanalization rates, and underscore the importance of truthfully reporting success rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Insights on Truthfully Reporting \\\"Success Rates\\\" in Modern Stroke Research: A Cautionary Tale.\",\"authors\":\"Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Marc Ribo\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2015, several trials confirmed the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. These findings revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment and established mechanical thrombectomy as a standard of care. Subsequent studies have further validated that optimal clinical outcomes are closely associated with achieving higher grades of complete reperfusion and minimizing the number of retrieval attempts. As a result, in recent years, the field has seen a growing trend of publications aggressively pursuing the highest rates of angiographic success. This trend is further exacerbated by the proliferation of impressive individual case reports shared on social media platforms, often devoid of significant scientific merit or educational value. We aim to review the potential biases in authors, which may incur when reporting recanalization rates, and underscore the importance of truthfully reporting success rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048972\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048972","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical Insights on Truthfully Reporting "Success Rates" in Modern Stroke Research: A Cautionary Tale.
In 2015, several trials confirmed the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. These findings revolutionized acute ischemic stroke treatment and established mechanical thrombectomy as a standard of care. Subsequent studies have further validated that optimal clinical outcomes are closely associated with achieving higher grades of complete reperfusion and minimizing the number of retrieval attempts. As a result, in recent years, the field has seen a growing trend of publications aggressively pursuing the highest rates of angiographic success. This trend is further exacerbated by the proliferation of impressive individual case reports shared on social media platforms, often devoid of significant scientific merit or educational value. We aim to review the potential biases in authors, which may incur when reporting recanalization rates, and underscore the importance of truthfully reporting success rates.
期刊介绍:
Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery.
The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists.
Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.