针灸是否能有效治疗头颈部癌症患者的放射性口腔溃疡?系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Wenzhe Gu, Hongjun Dong, Yuan Yuan, Zijiang Yuan, Xiaoting Jiang, Yuhan Qian, Zhengjie Shen
{"title":"针灸是否能有效治疗头颈部癌症患者的放射性口腔溃疡?系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Wenzhe Gu, Hongjun Dong, Yuan Yuan, Zijiang Yuan, Xiaoting Jiang, Yuhan Qian, Zhengjie Shen","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) stands out as one of the most severe side effects among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Given the varied conclusions in previous studies concerning the association between acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or acupuncture combined with standard oral care and therapeutic effects, our aim is to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing RIX in patients with HNC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Database) were electronically searched, following the Cochrane manual and adhering to reported Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from their inception dates to July 1, 2024. Primary randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified, with the Xerostomia Questionnaire and Xerostomia Inventory designated as the primary outcomes. Salivary flow rates (unstimulated or stimulated) were defined as secondary outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eight clinical trials involving 1273 participants were analyzed, with six studies included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that acupuncture demonstrated a significant improvement in patient-reported xerostomia scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) in comparison to standard care, but did not significantly improve oral dryness symptoms compared with sham acupuncture (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.16], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.8%). The merged total showed negative result (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.01], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 8.2%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.58, 0.13], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) and unstimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.72], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67.2%). In general, the acupuncture did not cause serious adverse effects. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> As far as current research is concerned, acupuncture treatment for RIX symptoms in patients with HNC still lacks strong and convincing evidence support. The more scientific research methods and more clinical trials are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Acupuncture an Effective Treatment for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenzhe Gu, Hongjun Dong, Yuan Yuan, Zijiang Yuan, Xiaoting Jiang, Yuhan Qian, Zhengjie Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jicm.2023.0781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) stands out as one of the most severe side effects among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Given the varied conclusions in previous studies concerning the association between acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or acupuncture combined with standard oral care and therapeutic effects, our aim is to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing RIX in patients with HNC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Database) were electronically searched, following the Cochrane manual and adhering to reported Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from their inception dates to July 1, 2024. Primary randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified, with the Xerostomia Questionnaire and Xerostomia Inventory designated as the primary outcomes. Salivary flow rates (unstimulated or stimulated) were defined as secondary outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eight clinical trials involving 1273 participants were analyzed, with six studies included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that acupuncture demonstrated a significant improvement in patient-reported xerostomia scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) in comparison to standard care, but did not significantly improve oral dryness symptoms compared with sham acupuncture (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.16], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 25.8%). The merged total showed negative result (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.01], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 8.2%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.58, 0.13], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) and unstimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.72], <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 67.2%). In general, the acupuncture did not cause serious adverse effects. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> As far as current research is concerned, acupuncture treatment for RIX symptoms in patients with HNC still lacks strong and convincing evidence support. The more scientific research methods and more clinical trials are still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射引起的口腔干燥症(RIX)是头颈部癌症(HNC)患者最严重的副作用之一。鉴于之前的研究对针灸、假针灸或针灸结合标准口腔护理与治疗效果之间的关联得出了不同的结论,我们的目的是进行一项系统性综述,以评估针灸治疗 HNC 患者 RIX 的有效性和安全性。研究方法按照 Cochrane 手册并遵照所报告的《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,对六个数据库(Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、中国国家知识基础设施、重庆 VIP 和万方数据库)进行了电子检索,检索时间从开始日期到 2024 年 7 月 1 日。确定了系统综述或荟萃分析中包含的主要随机临床试验,并将口腔干燥症问卷和口腔干燥症量表指定为主要结果。唾液流速(非刺激性或刺激性)被定义为次要结果。研究结果对涉及 1273 名参与者的 8 项临床试验进行了分析,其中 6 项研究纳入了荟萃分析。结果表明,与标准护理相比,针灸显著改善了患者报告的口腔干燥评分(标准化平均差 [SMD] = -0.20,95% 置信区间 [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02],I2 = 0%),但与假针灸相比,针灸并未显著改善口腔干燥症状(SMD = -0.06,95% CI [-0.29, 0.16],I2 = 25.8%)。合并总结果显示为负值(SMD = -0.13,95% CI [-0.27,0.01],I2 = 8.2%)。此外,刺激性唾液流量(SMD = -0.22,95% CI [-0.58,0.13],I2 = 0%)和非刺激性唾液流量(SMD = -0.19,95% CI [-0.11,0.72],I2 = 67.2%)无显著差异。总的来说,针灸没有引起严重的不良反应。结论就目前的研究而言,针灸治疗 HNC 患者的 RIX 症状仍缺乏有力和令人信服的证据支持。还需要更科学的研究方法和更多的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Acupuncture an Effective Treatment for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Radiation-induced xerostomia (RIX) stands out as one of the most severe side effects among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Given the varied conclusions in previous studies concerning the association between acupuncture, sham acupuncture, or acupuncture combined with standard oral care and therapeutic effects, our aim is to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing RIX in patients with HNC. Methods: Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and WanFang Database) were electronically searched, following the Cochrane manual and adhering to reported Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from their inception dates to July 1, 2024. Primary randomized clinical trials included in systematic reviews or meta-analyses were identified, with the Xerostomia Questionnaire and Xerostomia Inventory designated as the primary outcomes. Salivary flow rates (unstimulated or stimulated) were defined as secondary outcomes. Results: Eight clinical trials involving 1273 participants were analyzed, with six studies included in the meta-analysis. The results indicate that acupuncture demonstrated a significant improvement in patient-reported xerostomia scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.20, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] [-0.38, -0.02], I2 = 0%) in comparison to standard care, but did not significantly improve oral dryness symptoms compared with sham acupuncture (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI [-0.29, 0.16], I2 = 25.8%). The merged total showed negative result (SMD = -0.13, 95% CI [-0.27, 0.01], I2 = 8.2%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in stimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI [-0.58, 0.13], I2 = 0%) and unstimulated salivary flow rate (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.72], I2 = 67.2%). In general, the acupuncture did not cause serious adverse effects. Conclusion: As far as current research is concerned, acupuncture treatment for RIX symptoms in patients with HNC still lacks strong and convincing evidence support. The more scientific research methods and more clinical trials are still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信