Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra
{"title":"巨大原发性自发性气胸(2023 年法国指南定义):儿科患者的影像学尺寸是否重要?对比分析。","authors":"Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of \"large\" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"e27290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LARGE primary spontaneous pneumothorax (2023 French Guidelines definition): Do radiographic size matter in pediatric patients? A comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of \\\"large\\\" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e27290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27290\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
LARGE primary spontaneous pneumothorax (2023 French Guidelines definition): Do radiographic size matter in pediatric patients? A comparative analysis.
Purpose: Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of "large" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.
Inclusion criteria: age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).
Conclusions: In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.