巨大原发性自发性气胸(2023 年法国指南定义):儿科患者的影像学尺寸是否重要?对比分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Pulmonology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1002/ppul.27290
Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra
{"title":"巨大原发性自发性气胸(2023 年法国指南定义):儿科患者的影像学尺寸是否重要?对比分析。","authors":"Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra","doi":"10.1002/ppul.27290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of \"large\" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"e27290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LARGE primary spontaneous pneumothorax (2023 French Guidelines definition): Do radiographic size matter in pediatric patients? A comparative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Angelo Zarfati, Giovanni Rollo, Simone Frediani, Valerio Pardi, Ivan Pietro Aloi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.27290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of \\\"large\\\" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e27290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27290\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.27290","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是探讨成人指南中关于 "巨大 "原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的定义是否适用于儿科患者:我们对首次发病的 PSP 进行了回顾性单中心分析(时间:2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月)。我们根据法国SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV指南定义了大型PSP。纳入标准:年龄1-18岁,随访≥1年。我们对大型和非大型 PSP 进行了比较分析。我们用频率报告分类变量,用中位数和范围报告连续变量。分类变量的比较采用 Chi-Square 或 Fisher 检验,连续变量的比较采用 U Mann-Whitney 检验:研究对象包括 49 名患者,其中 15 人(30%)患有大型 PSP。我们发现,在年龄、性别、体侧、体重指数、血氧饱和度、呼吸频率和心率方面,大型 PSP 和非大型 PSP 在发病时没有明显差异。大型 PSP 采用保守一线治疗的比例明显较低(26% 对 82%,P = 0.0003),而采用引流管治疗的比例较高(46% 对 8%,P = 0.005)。两组患者的手术情况相似。大面积 PSP 的住院时间明显更长(7 天 vs. 4 天,p = 0.003)。两组患者一线治疗失败的发生率相似。在随访期间,我们发现同侧复发(33% 对 17%,P = 0.275)、对侧复发(0% 对 5%,P = 1.000)、引流需要(6% 对 5%,P = 1.000)或手术(33% 对 14%,P = 0.246)方面无明显差异:结论:在一线治疗中,大面积 PSP 的保守治疗和引流治疗明显较少。气胸的影像学大小似乎对一线治疗失败和随访结果没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LARGE primary spontaneous pneumothorax (2023 French Guidelines definition): Do radiographic size matter in pediatric patients? A comparative analysis.

Purpose: Our aim was to explore the applicability of the definition of "large" primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) of adult guidelines to pediatric patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of first-episodes of PSP (Period: January 2010-January 2023). We defined large PSP according to French SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines.

Inclusion criteria: age 1-18 years-old, follow-up ≥ 1 year. We performed a comparative analysis between large and nonlarge PSP. We reported the categorical variables as frequencies, and continuous as median and range. We compared categorical variables using Chi-Square or Fisher test, and continuous using U Mann-Whitney test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The population consisted of 49 patients, 15 (30%) with large PSP. We found no significant differences at presentation between large and nonlarge PSP regarding age, sex, side, BMI, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate and hearth rate. Conservative first-line management was used significantly less for large PSP (26% vs. 82%, p = 0.0003), while drain more (46% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The groups were similar regarding surgery. Large PSP had a significantly longer hospitalization (7 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.003). The incidence of first-line management failure was similar between the groups. During the follow-up, we found no significant differences regarding ipsilateral recurrence (33% vs. 17%, p = 0.275), and contralateral occurrence (0% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), need for drain (6% vs. 5%, p = 1.000), or surgery (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.246).

Conclusions: In the first-line, large PSP were treated significantly less conservatively and more drained. Radiographic size of the pneumothorax does not seem to have an impact on first-line treatment failure and follow-up outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信