局部肝细胞癌:单纯肝脏导向疗法是否与手术切除同样有效?

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058
Karina C Geranios, Michael S Littau, Simon S Park, Talia B Baker, G Weldon Gilcrease, Ziga Cizman, Tyler Smith, Marshall S Baker
{"title":"局部肝细胞癌:单纯肝脏导向疗法是否与手术切除同样有效?","authors":"Karina C Geranios, Michael S Littau, Simon S Park, Talia B Baker, G Weldon Gilcrease, Ziga Cizman, Tyler Smith, Marshall S Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"108939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: Is liver-directed therapy alone as efficacious as surgical resection?\",\"authors\":\"Karina C Geranios, Michael S Littau, Simon S Park, Talia B Baker, G Weldon Gilcrease, Ziga Cizman, Tyler Smith, Marshall S Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:研究肝脏定向治疗的非手术方法(经皮微波或射频消融、经动脉栓塞、化疗栓塞)的疗效对肝脏导向治疗的非手术方法(经皮微波或射频消融、经动脉栓塞、化疗栓塞和/或放射栓塞)在肝细胞癌治疗中的疗效研究缺乏同期手术队列比较。这些肝脏导向治疗方法在肝细胞癌治疗中的作用尚不明确:我们查询了2012年至2022年期间接受切除术或单纯肝脏导向疗法治疗的临床分期为I至IVa肝细胞癌患者的机构登记资料。采用多变量回归和 Cox 模型来确定与切除术和全因死亡率相关的因素。接受切除术的患者与接受肝脏导向疗法的患者在年龄、梅奥终末期肝病评分和临床分期方面进行了1:3倾向匹配。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法比较匹配组群的 5 年疾病特异性生存率和总生存率:330名患者符合纳入标准,其中45人接受了切除术,285人接受了肝脏导向疗法。在多变量回归中,与切除术相关的因素包括年龄(调整后的几率比:0.96,P = .007)和梅奥终末期肝病评分(调整后的几率比:0.92,P = .033)。在 Cox 模型中,与死亡风险相关的因素包括梅奥终末期肝病评分(调整后危险比:1.03,P = .01)、晚期临床分期(III 期调整后危险比:1.9,P = .002)和切除术(调整后危险比:0.43,P = .001)。45名接受切除术的患者与135名接受肝脏导向疗法的患者进行了配对。对匹配队列进行卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)比较后发现,接受切除术的患者总生存率有所提高(38.1% vs 8.4%,P = .015),但疾病特异性生存率与接受肝脏导向疗法的患者相似(84.0% vs 74.0%,P = .095):结论:肝脏导向疗法是治疗局部肝细胞癌患者的有效方法,其疾病特异性生存率与手术切除相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: Is liver-directed therapy alone as efficacious as surgical resection?

Objective: Studies of the efficacy of nonsurgical methods of liver-directed therapy (percutaneous microwave or radiofrequency ablation, transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization, and/or radioembolization) in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer lack contemporaneous comparative surgical cohorts. The role of these methods of liver-directed therapy as destination treatment in hepatocellular cancer is not well defined.

Methods: We queried our institutional registry for patients undergoing resection or liver-directed therapy alone for clinical stage I to IVa hepatocellular cancer between 2012 and 2022. Multivariable regression and Cox modeling were used to identify factors associated with resection and all-cause mortality. Patients undergoing resection were 1:3 propensity matched for age, Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score and clinical stage to those undergoing liver-directed therapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare 5-year disease-specific and overall survival for matched cohorts.

Results: Three hundred thirty patients met inclusion criteria; 45 underwent resection, and 285 liver-directed therapy. On multivariable regression, factors associated with resection included age (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, P = .007) and Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted odds ratio: 0.92, P = .033). On Cox modeling, factors associated with mortality-risk included Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease score (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.03, P = .01), advanced clinical stage (stage III adjusted hazards ratio: 1.9, P = .002), and resection (adjusted hazards ratio: 0.43, P = .001). Forty-five patients undergoing resection were matched to 135 undergoing liver-directed therapy. On Kaplan-Meier comparison of matched cohorts, patients undergoing resection demonstrated improved overall survival (38.1 vs 8.4%, P = .015) but disease-specific survival similar to that for those undergoing liver-directed therapy (84.0 vs 74.0%, P = .095).

Conclusion: Liver-directed therapy is effective as treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular cancer providing disease-specific survival similar to that provided by surgical resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信