关于长期在家接受肠内营养的儿童低位胃造口术喂食扩展装置微生物分离的前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Silvia Rodriguez-Manchon, Carmen Sanchez Fernandez-Bravo, Belén Hernández-Milán, Elvira Cañedo-Villarroya, Mercedes Alonso-Sanz, Consuelo Pedron-Giner
{"title":"关于长期在家接受肠内营养的儿童低位胃造口术喂食扩展装置微生物分离的前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Silvia Rodriguez-Manchon, Carmen Sanchez Fernandez-Bravo, Belén Hernández-Milán, Elvira Cañedo-Villarroya, Mercedes Alonso-Sanz, Consuelo Pedron-Giner","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although reuse of enteral feeding equipment has been linked to risk of microbial contamination and risk of infection, there is a paucity of research in this area. Per the manufacturer's instructions low-profile gastrostomy feeding extension sets (LPG-FES) may be reusable for the same patient, but there are no recommendations on replacement intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study to analyze and compare the contamination rate of LPG-FES after 15 (T1) and after 30 days (T2) of regular use. We included children 2-18 years of age exclusively receiving long-term home enteral nutrition (HEN) via LPG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 17 patients with a median age of 5 years (interquartile range: 3-8 years). We did not find statistically significant differences in microbial overgrowth comparing LPG-FES obtained after 15 or 30 days of use, although overgrowth was slightly higher in LPG-FES used for 30 days (64.7% and 70.6% vs 52.9% and 58.8%). Every patient presented at least one positive culture, either in T1 or T2. Candida parapsilosis was globally the most frequent microbiological finding. We found no relation between duration of HEN and type of feeding and positive culture at T1 and T2. We found no symptoms of local nor systemic infection during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the high rate of microbial overgrowth in the LPG-FES, no patient had clinical symptoms of infection secondary to this finding. Microbiological isolation in FES may represent only a form of contamination without clinical implications, which raises doubts on possible LPG-FES dwell times.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective observational study on microbiological isolation in low-profile gastrostomy's feeding extension sets in children on long-term home enteral nutrition.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Rodriguez-Manchon, Carmen Sanchez Fernandez-Bravo, Belén Hernández-Milán, Elvira Cañedo-Villarroya, Mercedes Alonso-Sanz, Consuelo Pedron-Giner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.11252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although reuse of enteral feeding equipment has been linked to risk of microbial contamination and risk of infection, there is a paucity of research in this area. Per the manufacturer's instructions low-profile gastrostomy feeding extension sets (LPG-FES) may be reusable for the same patient, but there are no recommendations on replacement intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study to analyze and compare the contamination rate of LPG-FES after 15 (T1) and after 30 days (T2) of regular use. We included children 2-18 years of age exclusively receiving long-term home enteral nutrition (HEN) via LPG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 17 patients with a median age of 5 years (interquartile range: 3-8 years). We did not find statistically significant differences in microbial overgrowth comparing LPG-FES obtained after 15 or 30 days of use, although overgrowth was slightly higher in LPG-FES used for 30 days (64.7% and 70.6% vs 52.9% and 58.8%). Every patient presented at least one positive culture, either in T1 or T2. Candida parapsilosis was globally the most frequent microbiological finding. We found no relation between duration of HEN and type of feeding and positive culture at T1 and T2. We found no symptoms of local nor systemic infection during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the high rate of microbial overgrowth in the LPG-FES, no patient had clinical symptoms of infection secondary to this finding. Microbiological isolation in FES may represent only a form of contamination without clinical implications, which raises doubts on possible LPG-FES dwell times.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管肠内喂养设备的重复使用与微生物污染风险和感染风险有关,但这方面的研究却很少。根据制造商的说明,低位胃造口术喂食扩展装置(LPG-FES)可重复用于同一患者,但没有关于更换间隔的建议:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,分析并比较 LPG-FES 定期使用 15 天(T1)和 30 天(T2)后的污染率。我们的研究对象包括专门通过液化石油气接受长期家庭肠内营养(HEN)的 2-18 岁儿童:我们共纳入了 17 名患者,中位年龄为 5 岁(四分位间范围:3-8 岁)。与使用 15 天或 30 天后获得的 LPG-FES 相比,我们没有发现微生物过度生长的显著统计学差异,但使用 30 天的 LPG-FES 微生物过度生长略高(64.7% 和 70.6% 对比 52.9% 和 58.8%)。每名患者在第一阶段或第二阶段都至少有一次培养呈阳性。副丝状念珠菌是全球最常见的微生物。我们发现,HEN持续时间、喂养方式与T1和T2培养阳性之间没有关系。在研究期间,我们没有发现局部或全身感染的症状:结论:尽管 LPG-FES 中微生物过度生长的比例很高,但没有患者因此而出现感染的临床症状。FES中的微生物分离可能只是一种污染形式,不会产生临床影响,这让人对LPG-FES可能的停留时间产生怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective observational study on microbiological isolation in low-profile gastrostomy's feeding extension sets in children on long-term home enteral nutrition.

Background: Although reuse of enteral feeding equipment has been linked to risk of microbial contamination and risk of infection, there is a paucity of research in this area. Per the manufacturer's instructions low-profile gastrostomy feeding extension sets (LPG-FES) may be reusable for the same patient, but there are no recommendations on replacement intervals.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study to analyze and compare the contamination rate of LPG-FES after 15 (T1) and after 30 days (T2) of regular use. We included children 2-18 years of age exclusively receiving long-term home enteral nutrition (HEN) via LPG.

Results: We included 17 patients with a median age of 5 years (interquartile range: 3-8 years). We did not find statistically significant differences in microbial overgrowth comparing LPG-FES obtained after 15 or 30 days of use, although overgrowth was slightly higher in LPG-FES used for 30 days (64.7% and 70.6% vs 52.9% and 58.8%). Every patient presented at least one positive culture, either in T1 or T2. Candida parapsilosis was globally the most frequent microbiological finding. We found no relation between duration of HEN and type of feeding and positive culture at T1 and T2. We found no symptoms of local nor systemic infection during the study period.

Conclusion: Despite the high rate of microbial overgrowth in the LPG-FES, no patient had clinical symptoms of infection secondary to this finding. Microbiological isolation in FES may represent only a form of contamination without clinical implications, which raises doubts on possible LPG-FES dwell times.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信