一家机构的眼科住院医师使用宽视场扫源光学相干断层扫描血管造影术和荧光素血管造影术检测增生性糖尿病视网膜病变中的新生血管的比较。

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY

Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3928/23258160-20241114-01

Karen M Wai, Jade Y Moon, Itika Garg, Ying Cui, Raviv Katz, Ying Zhu, Edward S Lu, Rebecca Zeng, David M Wu, Deeba Husain, Demetrios G Vavvas, John B Miller

{"title":"一家机构的眼科住院医师使用宽视场扫源光学相干断层扫描血管造影术和荧光素血管造影术检测增生性糖尿病视网膜病变中的新生血管的比较。","authors":"Karen M Wai, Jade Y Moon, Itika Garg, Ying Cui, Raviv Katz, Ying Zhu, Edward S Lu, Rebecca Zeng, David M Wu, Deeba Husain, Demetrios G Vavvas, John B Miller","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20241114-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: This study compares the ability of resident ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA).Patients and methods: Fluorescein angiography and SS-OCTA images were scrambled to create a grading set consisting of 1) early and late phase FA images, 2) B-scan videos, and 3) vitreoretinal interface (VRI) slab. Participants were asked to identify NV.Results: Twelve resident physicians participated in the study. Resident physicians correctly identified 75.6% of NV using FA, 65.3% of NV using SS-OCTA B-scans, and 90.7% of NV using the SSOCTA VRI slab. There was no statistically significant difference in participants' ability to detect NV across imaging modalities (P = 0.08).Conclusion: Detection rates of NV using SS-OCTA were comparable to that of using FA. Results suggest that SS-OCTA may be an appropriate imaging modality for detection of NV in PDR patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Neovascularization Detection in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Widefield Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Among Ophthalmology Residents at a Single Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Karen M Wai, Jade Y Moon, Itika Garg, Ying Cui, Raviv Katz, Ying Zhu, Edward S Lu, Rebecca Zeng, David M Wu, Deeba Husain, Demetrios G Vavvas, John B Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/23258160-20241114-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objective: This study compares the ability of resident ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA).Patients and methods: Fluorescein angiography and SS-OCTA images were scrambled to create a grading set consisting of 1) early and late phase FA images, 2) B-scan videos, and 3) vitreoretinal interface (VRI) slab. Participants were asked to identify NV.Results: Twelve resident physicians participated in the study. Resident physicians correctly identified 75.6% of NV using FA, 65.3% of NV using SS-OCTA B-scans, and 90.7% of NV using the SSOCTA VRI slab. There was no statistically significant difference in participants' ability to detect NV across imaging modalities (P = 0.08).Conclusion: Detection rates of NV using SS-OCTA were comparable to that of using FA. Results suggest that SS-OCTA may be an appropriate imaging modality for detection of NV in PDR patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].\",\"PeriodicalId\":19679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20241114-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20241114-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的：本研究比较了眼科住院医生使用宽场扫源光学相干断层血管造影（SS-OCTA）和荧光素血管造影（FA）识别增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变（PDR）患者新生血管（NV）的能力：对荧光素血管造影和 SS-OCTA 图像进行混杂处理，以创建由以下内容组成的分级集：1）早期和晚期 FA 图像；2）B 扫描视频；3）玻璃体视网膜界面 (VRI) 平板。要求参与者识别 NV：结果：12 名住院医师参与了研究。住院医师使用 FA 正确识别了 75.6% 的 NV，使用 SS-OCTA B 扫描正确识别了 65.3% 的 NV，使用 SSOCTA VRI 片正确识别了 90.7% 的 NV。不同成像模式下，参与者检测 NV 的能力没有明显的统计学差异（P = 0.08）：结论：使用 SS-OCTA 的 NV 检测率与使用 FA 的检测率相当。结果表明，SS-OCTA 可能是检测 PDR 患者 NV 的合适成像模式。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:XX-XX]。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of Neovascularization Detection in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Widefield Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Among Ophthalmology Residents at a Single Institution.

Background and objective: This study compares the ability of resident ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA).

Patients and methods: Fluorescein angiography and SS-OCTA images were scrambled to create a grading set consisting of 1) early and late phase FA images, 2) B-scan videos, and 3) vitreoretinal interface (VRI) slab. Participants were asked to identify NV.

Results: Twelve resident physicians participated in the study. Resident physicians correctly identified 75.6% of NV using FA, 65.3% of NV using SS-OCTA B-scans, and 90.7% of NV using the SSOCTA VRI slab. There was no statistically significant difference in participants' ability to detect NV across imaging modalities (P = 0.08).

Conclusion: Detection rates of NV using SS-OCTA were comparable to that of using FA. Results suggest that SS-OCTA may be an appropriate imaging modality for detection of NV in PDR patients. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina OPHTHALMOLOGY-SURGERY

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.