侵袭性非伤寒沙门氏菌与非侵袭性分离菌的基因组和转录组比较

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Tongyao Shang, Qiuli Chen, Weina Shi, Yue Wang, Ye Feng
{"title":"侵袭性非伤寒沙门氏菌与非侵袭性分离菌的基因组和转录组比较","authors":"Tongyao Shang, Qiuli Chen, Weina Shi, Yue Wang, Ye Feng","doi":"10.3390/microorganisms12112288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasive non-typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> (iNTS) poses a significant threat to global public health. <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Enteritidis and Typhimurium are the primary serovars responsible for both invasive diseases and gastroenteritis. This study aims to investigate the genomic and transcriptomic differences between isolates associated with these contrasting clinical presentations. We retrieved genomes of <i>Salmonella</i> Enteritidis and <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium from Enterobase, utilizing blood and stool isolates as representatives for iNTS and non-iNTS, respectively. An indistinguishable phylogenetic relationship was revealed between the blood and stool isolates for both serovars. Few genes were specifically identified in iNTS. Random forest and principal coordinates analysis permitted moderate discrimination between the two sources of isolates based on overall genome content. Notably, the blood isolates of <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium displayed an elevated level of antimicrobial resistance and genome degradation compared to stool isolates. Meanwhile, transcriptome sequencing identified few genes that were differentially expressed between blood and stool isolates. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis did not effectively differentiate the expression profile of iNTS from non-iNTS. In summary, few genes could serve as reliable biomarkers to distinguish iNTS and non-iNTS at either the genomic or transcriptomic level. Nevertheless, iNTS has indeed accumulated subtle genomic differences from non-iNTS, which might contribute to invasiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18667,"journal":{"name":"Microorganisms","volume":"12 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic and Transcriptomic Comparison Between Invasive Non-Typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> and Non-Invasive Isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Tongyao Shang, Qiuli Chen, Weina Shi, Yue Wang, Ye Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/microorganisms12112288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Invasive non-typhoidal <i>Salmonella</i> (iNTS) poses a significant threat to global public health. <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Enteritidis and Typhimurium are the primary serovars responsible for both invasive diseases and gastroenteritis. This study aims to investigate the genomic and transcriptomic differences between isolates associated with these contrasting clinical presentations. We retrieved genomes of <i>Salmonella</i> Enteritidis and <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium from Enterobase, utilizing blood and stool isolates as representatives for iNTS and non-iNTS, respectively. An indistinguishable phylogenetic relationship was revealed between the blood and stool isolates for both serovars. Few genes were specifically identified in iNTS. Random forest and principal coordinates analysis permitted moderate discrimination between the two sources of isolates based on overall genome content. Notably, the blood isolates of <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium displayed an elevated level of antimicrobial resistance and genome degradation compared to stool isolates. Meanwhile, transcriptome sequencing identified few genes that were differentially expressed between blood and stool isolates. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis did not effectively differentiate the expression profile of iNTS from non-iNTS. In summary, few genes could serve as reliable biomarkers to distinguish iNTS and non-iNTS at either the genomic or transcriptomic level. Nevertheless, iNTS has indeed accumulated subtle genomic differences from non-iNTS, which might contribute to invasiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microorganisms\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microorganisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112288\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microorganisms","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

侵袭性非伤寒沙门氏菌(iNTS)对全球公共卫生构成重大威胁。肠炎沙门氏菌和伤寒沙门氏菌是引起侵袭性疾病和肠胃炎的主要血清型。本研究旨在调查与这些截然不同的临床表现相关的分离株之间的基因组和转录组差异。我们从 Enterobase 中检索了肠炎沙门氏菌和鼠伤寒沙门氏菌的基因组,分别以血液和粪便分离物作为 iNTS 和非 iNTS 的代表。结果表明,血液和粪便分离物中的两种血清型之间存在难以区分的系统发育关系。在 iNTS 中很少有基因被特别鉴定出来。随机森林和主坐标分析可根据基因组的整体含量对两种来源的分离物进行适度区分。值得注意的是,与粪便分离物相比,血液中分离出的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌显示出更高的抗菌药耐药性和基因组降解水平。同时,转录组测序发现血液分离物和粪便分离物中表达不同的基因很少。层次聚类和主成分分析并不能有效区分 iNTS 和非 iNTS 的表达谱。总之,在基因组或转录组水平上,很少有基因能作为可靠的生物标志物来区分 iNTS 和非 iNTS。尽管如此,iNTS 确实积累了与非 iNTS 的微妙基因组差异,这可能是导致侵袭性的原因之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genomic and Transcriptomic Comparison Between Invasive Non-Typhoidal Salmonella and Non-Invasive Isolates.

Invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella (iNTS) poses a significant threat to global public health. Salmonella enterica Enteritidis and Typhimurium are the primary serovars responsible for both invasive diseases and gastroenteritis. This study aims to investigate the genomic and transcriptomic differences between isolates associated with these contrasting clinical presentations. We retrieved genomes of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium from Enterobase, utilizing blood and stool isolates as representatives for iNTS and non-iNTS, respectively. An indistinguishable phylogenetic relationship was revealed between the blood and stool isolates for both serovars. Few genes were specifically identified in iNTS. Random forest and principal coordinates analysis permitted moderate discrimination between the two sources of isolates based on overall genome content. Notably, the blood isolates of Salmonella Typhimurium displayed an elevated level of antimicrobial resistance and genome degradation compared to stool isolates. Meanwhile, transcriptome sequencing identified few genes that were differentially expressed between blood and stool isolates. Hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis did not effectively differentiate the expression profile of iNTS from non-iNTS. In summary, few genes could serve as reliable biomarkers to distinguish iNTS and non-iNTS at either the genomic or transcriptomic level. Nevertheless, iNTS has indeed accumulated subtle genomic differences from non-iNTS, which might contribute to invasiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microorganisms
Microorganisms Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2168
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and prions. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信