Robert M Gifford, Thomas J O'Leary, Rebecca L Knight, Sophie L Wardle, Craig L Doig, Richard A Anderson, Julie P Greeves, Rebecca M Reynolds, David R Woods
{"title":"军事训练期间与性别相关的下丘脑-垂体-性腺和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴适应性。","authors":"Robert M Gifford, Thomas J O'Leary, Rebecca L Knight, Sophie L Wardle, Craig L Doig, Richard A Anderson, Julie P Greeves, Rebecca M Reynolds, David R Woods","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00691.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive endocrine function adapts to psychological, environmental, and energy-associated stressors. Multistressor environments upregulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, causing suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, but it is not known if this pattern or its magnitude is sex biased. We compared HPG and HPA axis activity in 9 men and 34 women undergoing Army training. One-hour low-dose gonadorelin and Synacthen tests were conducted at 1 and 29 wk, measuring gonadotrophins and cortisol. Cortisol was measured from hair every 3 mo. Morning and evening salivary cortisol and psychometric questionnaires were measured at six timepoints. Sexes were compared over time by two-way ANOVA. Gonadotrophin responses were significantly higher in women than men in <i>week 1</i>, but no sex difference was seen at <i>week 29</i> (no significant sex × time interaction). <i>Week 1</i> cortisol response was higher among men, but <i>week 29</i> cortisol response was higher among women (sex × time <i>F</i><sub>(1,44)</sub> = 18.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hair cortisol was higher among women than men beforehand, not different between sexes during the first 3 mo, and significantly higher among women during training <i>months 5</i>-<i>11</i> (<i>F</i><sub>(3,15)</sub> = 3.25, <i>P</i> = 0.024). Morning salivary cortisol was higher among women in <i>weeks 8</i> and <i>14</i>, but higher among men in <i>week 29</i> (<i>F</i><sub>(4,76)</sub> = 4.0, <i>P</i> = 0.005). No differences were seen in evening salivary cortisol. Psychometrics did not change or differ between sexes. HPA axis responses to military training were greater among women than men. HPG axis responses suggest greater downregulation among women. These findings will enable equitable and individualized management of people undergoing periods of intensive physical stress.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We conducted a comprehensive comparison of adrenal and reproductive function in men and women undergoing 11-mo military training. We found progressively elevated cortisol levels and dynamic cortisol response to stress among women, but not men, and suppression of reproductive function among women. The physiological impact of stressful military training was greater among women than men; this could not be explained by energy balance, and sex-specific effects of sleep, socio-ethnographic, or other stressors may be responsible.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex-related hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis adaptation during military training.\",\"authors\":\"Robert M Gifford, Thomas J O'Leary, Rebecca L Knight, Sophie L Wardle, Craig L Doig, Richard A Anderson, Julie P Greeves, Rebecca M Reynolds, David R Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00691.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reproductive endocrine function adapts to psychological, environmental, and energy-associated stressors. Multistressor environments upregulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, causing suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, but it is not known if this pattern or its magnitude is sex biased. We compared HPG and HPA axis activity in 9 men and 34 women undergoing Army training. One-hour low-dose gonadorelin and Synacthen tests were conducted at 1 and 29 wk, measuring gonadotrophins and cortisol. Cortisol was measured from hair every 3 mo. Morning and evening salivary cortisol and psychometric questionnaires were measured at six timepoints. Sexes were compared over time by two-way ANOVA. Gonadotrophin responses were significantly higher in women than men in <i>week 1</i>, but no sex difference was seen at <i>week 29</i> (no significant sex × time interaction). <i>Week 1</i> cortisol response was higher among men, but <i>week 29</i> cortisol response was higher among women (sex × time <i>F</i><sub>(1,44)</sub> = 18.0, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Hair cortisol was higher among women than men beforehand, not different between sexes during the first 3 mo, and significantly higher among women during training <i>months 5</i>-<i>11</i> (<i>F</i><sub>(3,15)</sub> = 3.25, <i>P</i> = 0.024). Morning salivary cortisol was higher among women in <i>weeks 8</i> and <i>14</i>, but higher among men in <i>week 29</i> (<i>F</i><sub>(4,76)</sub> = 4.0, <i>P</i> = 0.005). No differences were seen in evening salivary cortisol. Psychometrics did not change or differ between sexes. HPA axis responses to military training were greater among women than men. HPG axis responses suggest greater downregulation among women. These findings will enable equitable and individualized management of people undergoing periods of intensive physical stress.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We conducted a comprehensive comparison of adrenal and reproductive function in men and women undergoing 11-mo military training. We found progressively elevated cortisol levels and dynamic cortisol response to stress among women, but not men, and suppression of reproductive function among women. The physiological impact of stressful military training was greater among women than men; this could not be explained by energy balance, and sex-specific effects of sleep, socio-ethnographic, or other stressors may be responsible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00691.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00691.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex-related hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis adaptation during military training.
Reproductive endocrine function adapts to psychological, environmental, and energy-associated stressors. Multistressor environments upregulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, causing suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, but it is not known if this pattern or its magnitude is sex biased. We compared HPG and HPA axis activity in 9 men and 34 women undergoing Army training. One-hour low-dose gonadorelin and Synacthen tests were conducted at 1 and 29 wk, measuring gonadotrophins and cortisol. Cortisol was measured from hair every 3 mo. Morning and evening salivary cortisol and psychometric questionnaires were measured at six timepoints. Sexes were compared over time by two-way ANOVA. Gonadotrophin responses were significantly higher in women than men in week 1, but no sex difference was seen at week 29 (no significant sex × time interaction). Week 1 cortisol response was higher among men, but week 29 cortisol response was higher among women (sex × time F(1,44) = 18.0, P < 0.001). Hair cortisol was higher among women than men beforehand, not different between sexes during the first 3 mo, and significantly higher among women during training months 5-11 (F(3,15) = 3.25, P = 0.024). Morning salivary cortisol was higher among women in weeks 8 and 14, but higher among men in week 29 (F(4,76) = 4.0, P = 0.005). No differences were seen in evening salivary cortisol. Psychometrics did not change or differ between sexes. HPA axis responses to military training were greater among women than men. HPG axis responses suggest greater downregulation among women. These findings will enable equitable and individualized management of people undergoing periods of intensive physical stress.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We conducted a comprehensive comparison of adrenal and reproductive function in men and women undergoing 11-mo military training. We found progressively elevated cortisol levels and dynamic cortisol response to stress among women, but not men, and suppression of reproductive function among women. The physiological impact of stressful military training was greater among women than men; this could not be explained by energy balance, and sex-specific effects of sleep, socio-ethnographic, or other stressors may be responsible.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.