{"title":"单腔室关节成形术的成功预测:一项为期三年的印度研究。","authors":"Deepak Kumar, Ajay Shukla, Omprakash Meena, Manjesh Reddy S V, Mohit Singh, Saurabh Gadi, Girish Gulab Meshram","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06379-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the three year clinical outcomes and predictors of success for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in an Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (≥ Ahlbäck grade 2) underwent UKA. American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS) were assessed at baseline, two weeks, six weeks, three months, and three years. Postoperative Hip Knee Ankle angle (HKA) and the Knee Joint Line Obliquity angle (KJO) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At three years, UKA led to significant improvements in knee health, function, and pain. AKKS improved from 62.20 ± 5.27 to 90.60 ± 3.81, OKS from 37.00 ± 1.55 to 19.15 ± 1.93, and VAS from 8.45 ± 0.69 to 2.40 ± 0.59 (all P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS was significantly correlated with both preoperative and postoperative outcomes of knee health and function (preoperative and three year AKSS and OKS), and limb alignment (HKA and KJO). Preoperative AKSS correlated with postoperative knee health and functional outcomes (3-year AKSS and OKS), pain levels (3-year VAS), and limb alignment (KJO).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of an Indian population, UKA demonstrated significant, sustained clinical improvements over three years, with no implant-related complications. In our cohort, preoperative pain and knee health significantly predicted outcomes. These findings suggest that preoperative assessment and optimization of both pain and knee health may potentially enhance the postoperative outcomes after UKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"437-445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting unicompartmental arthroplasty success: a three year Indian study.\",\"authors\":\"Deepak Kumar, Ajay Shukla, Omprakash Meena, Manjesh Reddy S V, Mohit Singh, Saurabh Gadi, Girish Gulab Meshram\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06379-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the three year clinical outcomes and predictors of success for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in an Indian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (≥ Ahlbäck grade 2) underwent UKA. American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS) were assessed at baseline, two weeks, six weeks, three months, and three years. Postoperative Hip Knee Ankle angle (HKA) and the Knee Joint Line Obliquity angle (KJO) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At three years, UKA led to significant improvements in knee health, function, and pain. AKKS improved from 62.20 ± 5.27 to 90.60 ± 3.81, OKS from 37.00 ± 1.55 to 19.15 ± 1.93, and VAS from 8.45 ± 0.69 to 2.40 ± 0.59 (all P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS was significantly correlated with both preoperative and postoperative outcomes of knee health and function (preoperative and three year AKSS and OKS), and limb alignment (HKA and KJO). Preoperative AKSS correlated with postoperative knee health and functional outcomes (3-year AKSS and OKS), pain levels (3-year VAS), and limb alignment (KJO).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of an Indian population, UKA demonstrated significant, sustained clinical improvements over three years, with no implant-related complications. In our cohort, preoperative pain and knee health significantly predicted outcomes. These findings suggest that preoperative assessment and optimization of both pain and knee health may potentially enhance the postoperative outcomes after UKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"437-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06379-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06379-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting unicompartmental arthroplasty success: a three year Indian study.
Purpose: This study evaluated the three year clinical outcomes and predictors of success for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in an Indian population.
Methods: Twenty patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (≥ Ahlbäck grade 2) underwent UKA. American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Visual Analogue Scale Score (VAS) were assessed at baseline, two weeks, six weeks, three months, and three years. Postoperative Hip Knee Ankle angle (HKA) and the Knee Joint Line Obliquity angle (KJO) were measured.
Results: At three years, UKA led to significant improvements in knee health, function, and pain. AKKS improved from 62.20 ± 5.27 to 90.60 ± 3.81, OKS from 37.00 ± 1.55 to 19.15 ± 1.93, and VAS from 8.45 ± 0.69 to 2.40 ± 0.59 (all P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS was significantly correlated with both preoperative and postoperative outcomes of knee health and function (preoperative and three year AKSS and OKS), and limb alignment (HKA and KJO). Preoperative AKSS correlated with postoperative knee health and functional outcomes (3-year AKSS and OKS), pain levels (3-year VAS), and limb alignment (KJO).
Conclusions: In this study of an Indian population, UKA demonstrated significant, sustained clinical improvements over three years, with no implant-related complications. In our cohort, preoperative pain and knee health significantly predicted outcomes. These findings suggest that preoperative assessment and optimization of both pain and knee health may potentially enhance the postoperative outcomes after UKA.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.