扩大分子肿瘤学术委员会,以增强美国东南部农村地区获得生物标记物驱动的试验和疗法的机会。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Anivarya Kumar, Jennifer R Owen, Nicholette T Sloat, Elizabeth Maynard, Vanessa M Hill, Christopher B Hubbard, Matthew S McKinney, Linda M Sutton, Shannon J McCall, Michael B Datto, Ashley N Moyer, Bennett A Caughey, John H Strickler, Ryne C Ramaker
{"title":"扩大分子肿瘤学术委员会,以增强美国东南部农村地区获得生物标记物驱动的试验和疗法的机会。","authors":"Anivarya Kumar, Jennifer R Owen, Nicholette T Sloat, Elizabeth Maynard, Vanessa M Hill, Christopher B Hubbard, Matthew S McKinney, Linda M Sutton, Shannon J McCall, Michael B Datto, Ashley N Moyer, Bennett A Caughey, John H Strickler, Ryne C Ramaker","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeting tumor-specific molecular alterations has shown significant clinical benefit. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) connect cancer patients with personalized treatments and clinical trials. However, rural cancer centers often have limited access to MTB expertise. We established an academic-community partnership expanding our academic MTB to affiliated rural community cancer centers. We developed a centralized molecular registry of tumors (MRT) to aggregate the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results and facilitate multidisciplinary MTB review. Of the 151 patients included, 87 (58%) had actionable genomic biomarkers, 42 (28%) were eligible for a targeted off-label therapy, and 27 (18%) were matched to a clinical trial. Of those with a clinical trial match, only 1 of 27 (3%) was enrolled in the identified trial. One year into implementation, community oncology providers were anonymously surveyed on persistent barriers to precision treatment utilization. The primary barriers to clinical trial enrollment were the distance to the trial center (70%), lack of transportation (55%), and lack of local trials (50%). This study offers a framework to improve access to molecular expertise, but significant barriers to the equitable use of CGP and trial enrollment persist.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"7244-7257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expansion of an Academic Molecular Tumor Board to Enhance Access to Biomarker-Driven Trials and Therapies in the Rural Southeastern United States.\",\"authors\":\"Anivarya Kumar, Jennifer R Owen, Nicholette T Sloat, Elizabeth Maynard, Vanessa M Hill, Christopher B Hubbard, Matthew S McKinney, Linda M Sutton, Shannon J McCall, Michael B Datto, Ashley N Moyer, Bennett A Caughey, John H Strickler, Ryne C Ramaker\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31110534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Targeting tumor-specific molecular alterations has shown significant clinical benefit. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) connect cancer patients with personalized treatments and clinical trials. However, rural cancer centers often have limited access to MTB expertise. We established an academic-community partnership expanding our academic MTB to affiliated rural community cancer centers. We developed a centralized molecular registry of tumors (MRT) to aggregate the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results and facilitate multidisciplinary MTB review. Of the 151 patients included, 87 (58%) had actionable genomic biomarkers, 42 (28%) were eligible for a targeted off-label therapy, and 27 (18%) were matched to a clinical trial. Of those with a clinical trial match, only 1 of 27 (3%) was enrolled in the identified trial. One year into implementation, community oncology providers were anonymously surveyed on persistent barriers to precision treatment utilization. The primary barriers to clinical trial enrollment were the distance to the trial center (70%), lack of transportation (55%), and lack of local trials (50%). This study offers a framework to improve access to molecular expertise, but significant barriers to the equitable use of CGP and trial enrollment persist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"7244-7257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11593073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110534\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对肿瘤特异性分子改变的治疗已显示出显著的临床疗效。分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)将癌症患者与个性化治疗和临床试验联系起来。然而,农村癌症中心获得分子肿瘤委员会专业知识的机会往往有限。我们建立了学术与社区合作关系,将我们的学术肿瘤委员会扩展到附属的农村社区癌症中心。我们建立了一个集中的肿瘤分子登记处(MRT),以汇总综合基因组剖析(CGP)结果并促进多学科 MTB 审查。在纳入的 151 例患者中,87 例(58%)具有可操作的基因组生物标志物,42 例(28%)符合标签外靶向治疗的条件,27 例(18%)与临床试验相匹配。在与临床试验匹配的患者中,27 人中只有 1 人(3%)参加了确定的试验。在实施一年后,对社区肿瘤医疗服务提供者进行了匿名调查,了解他们在利用精准治疗时遇到的持续性障碍。临床试验注册的主要障碍是到试验中心的距离(70%)、交通不便(55%)和缺乏本地试验(50%)。这项研究为改善分子专业技术的获取提供了一个框架,但在公平使用 CGP 和试验注册方面仍存在重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expansion of an Academic Molecular Tumor Board to Enhance Access to Biomarker-Driven Trials and Therapies in the Rural Southeastern United States.

Targeting tumor-specific molecular alterations has shown significant clinical benefit. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) connect cancer patients with personalized treatments and clinical trials. However, rural cancer centers often have limited access to MTB expertise. We established an academic-community partnership expanding our academic MTB to affiliated rural community cancer centers. We developed a centralized molecular registry of tumors (MRT) to aggregate the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results and facilitate multidisciplinary MTB review. Of the 151 patients included, 87 (58%) had actionable genomic biomarkers, 42 (28%) were eligible for a targeted off-label therapy, and 27 (18%) were matched to a clinical trial. Of those with a clinical trial match, only 1 of 27 (3%) was enrolled in the identified trial. One year into implementation, community oncology providers were anonymously surveyed on persistent barriers to precision treatment utilization. The primary barriers to clinical trial enrollment were the distance to the trial center (70%), lack of transportation (55%), and lack of local trials (50%). This study offers a framework to improve access to molecular expertise, but significant barriers to the equitable use of CGP and trial enrollment persist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信