基于 MRI 的 ADC 测量在检测腋窝淋巴结转移中的有效性:一项前瞻性研究的评估

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Faruk Türkeş, Özcan Dere, Funda Dinç, Cenk Yazkan, Önder Özcan, Okay Nazlı
{"title":"基于 MRI 的 ADC 测量在检测腋窝淋巴结转移中的有效性:一项前瞻性研究的评估","authors":"Faruk Türkeş, Özcan Dere, Funda Dinç, Cenk Yazkan, Önder Özcan, Okay Nazlı","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31110487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. By comparing preoperative MRI findings with intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and postoperative pathological results, we sought to explore the potential of ADC values as a non-invasive alternative to axillary interventions. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 104 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2019 and 2021 were included in this prospective study. ADC values of axillary lymph nodes, tumors, and muscle tissues were measured using a 3T MRI system. The correlation between these measurements and pathological outcomes was analyzed. Statistical analyses, including <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis, were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of ADC values. <b>Results:</b> The results indicated that, while the mean ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were lower than those of benign nodes, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based ADC measurements were inferior to the expected standards. The tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio were found to be more reliable indicators of metastasis than the lymph node ADC value alone. The diagnostic power of the tumor ADC value was significant, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. <b>Conclusions:</b> MRI-based ADC measurements, particularly the tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio, show promise as potential non-invasive markers for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. However, the current results suggest that ADC measurements cannot yet replace SLNB in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 11","pages":"6598-6607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of MRI-Based ADC Measurements in Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis: Evaluation of a Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Faruk Türkeş, Özcan Dere, Funda Dinç, Cenk Yazkan, Önder Özcan, Okay Nazlı\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31110487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. By comparing preoperative MRI findings with intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and postoperative pathological results, we sought to explore the potential of ADC values as a non-invasive alternative to axillary interventions. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 104 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2019 and 2021 were included in this prospective study. ADC values of axillary lymph nodes, tumors, and muscle tissues were measured using a 3T MRI system. The correlation between these measurements and pathological outcomes was analyzed. Statistical analyses, including <i>t</i>-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis, were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of ADC values. <b>Results:</b> The results indicated that, while the mean ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were lower than those of benign nodes, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based ADC measurements were inferior to the expected standards. The tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio were found to be more reliable indicators of metastasis than the lymph node ADC value alone. The diagnostic power of the tumor ADC value was significant, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. <b>Conclusions:</b> MRI-based ADC measurements, particularly the tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio, show promise as potential non-invasive markers for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. However, the current results suggest that ADC measurements cannot yet replace SLNB in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 11\",\"pages\":\"6598-6607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11592749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31110487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估基于磁共振成像的表观扩散系数(ADC)测量在检测乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移方面的功效。通过比较术前磁共振成像结果、术中前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)结果和术后病理结果,我们试图探索 ADC 值作为腋窝介入治疗的无创替代方法的潜力。研究方法这项前瞻性研究共纳入了104名在2019年至2021年期间确诊为乳腺癌的女性患者。使用 3T 磁共振成像系统测量了腋窝淋巴结、肿瘤和肌肉组织的 ADC 值。分析了这些测量值与病理结果之间的相关性。统计分析包括 t 检验、方差分析和 ROC 曲线分析,以评估 ADC 值的诊断性能。结果显示结果表明,虽然转移性淋巴结的平均 ADC 值低于良性淋巴结,但基于 MRI 的 ADC 测量的灵敏度和特异性均低于预期标准。研究发现,肿瘤 ADC 值和肿瘤与淋巴结 ADC 比值是比单独的淋巴结 ADC 值更可靠的转移指标。肿瘤 ADC 值的诊断能力很强,敏感性为 75%,特异性为 73%。结论基于 MRI 的 ADC 测量,尤其是肿瘤 ADC 值和肿瘤与淋巴结 ADC 比值,有望成为乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的潜在无创标记物。然而,目前的结果表明,在临床实践中,ADC 测量还不能取代 SLNB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of MRI-Based ADC Measurements in Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis: Evaluation of a Prospective Study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MRI-based Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements in detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. By comparing preoperative MRI findings with intraoperative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and postoperative pathological results, we sought to explore the potential of ADC values as a non-invasive alternative to axillary interventions. Methods: A total of 104 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2019 and 2021 were included in this prospective study. ADC values of axillary lymph nodes, tumors, and muscle tissues were measured using a 3T MRI system. The correlation between these measurements and pathological outcomes was analyzed. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and ROC curve analysis, were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of ADC values. Results: The results indicated that, while the mean ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were lower than those of benign nodes, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI-based ADC measurements were inferior to the expected standards. The tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio were found to be more reliable indicators of metastasis than the lymph node ADC value alone. The diagnostic power of the tumor ADC value was significant, with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 73%. Conclusions: MRI-based ADC measurements, particularly the tumor ADC value and the tumor-to-lymph node ADC ratio, show promise as potential non-invasive markers for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. However, the current results suggest that ADC measurements cannot yet replace SLNB in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信