棋盘鱼(Ostracioidea)甲壳的比较结构。

IF 5.2 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Lennart Eigen, Jan Wölfer, Daniel Baum, Mai-Lee Van Le, Daniel Werner, Mason N Dean, John A Nyakatura
{"title":"棋盘鱼(Ostracioidea)甲壳的比较结构。","authors":"Lennart Eigen, Jan Wölfer, Daniel Baum, Mai-Lee Van Le, Daniel Werner, Mason N Dean, John A Nyakatura","doi":"10.1038/s42003-024-07119-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tessellations (surface architectures of arrays of hard tiles) are common in natural and man-made designs. Boxfishes (Ostracioidea) are almost completely encased in a tessellated armor and have evolved a plethora of cross-sectional carapace shapes, yet whether the scutes constructing these exhibit comparable variation is unknown. Using high-resolution microCT and semi-automatic segmentation algorithms, we quantitatively examined thousands of scutes from 13 species of diverse body form. A cluster analysis revealed that certain scute types are associated with specific carapace regions independent of carapace shape. Scute types differentiate between carapace edges and flat regions, as well as between the head region with many carapace openings and the more consistently closed abdominal region, pointing at a constructional commonality or constraint shared by all boxfish species. However, the dimensions of edge scutes varied systematically with carapace shape (e.g., scute aspect ratio tended to increase with decreasing carapace height). This suggests that protection is maintained across body forms by managing scute- and carapace-level mechanisms for increasing bending resistance. Future studies on other taxa are necessary to understand whether these architectural principles are specific evolutionary solutions for building a boxfish carapace or whether they are shared by other biological systems that serve a similar protective function.</p>","PeriodicalId":10552,"journal":{"name":"Communications Biology","volume":"7 1","pages":"1571"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative architecture of the tessellated boxfish (Ostracioidea) carapace.\",\"authors\":\"Lennart Eigen, Jan Wölfer, Daniel Baum, Mai-Lee Van Le, Daniel Werner, Mason N Dean, John A Nyakatura\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s42003-024-07119-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tessellations (surface architectures of arrays of hard tiles) are common in natural and man-made designs. Boxfishes (Ostracioidea) are almost completely encased in a tessellated armor and have evolved a plethora of cross-sectional carapace shapes, yet whether the scutes constructing these exhibit comparable variation is unknown. Using high-resolution microCT and semi-automatic segmentation algorithms, we quantitatively examined thousands of scutes from 13 species of diverse body form. A cluster analysis revealed that certain scute types are associated with specific carapace regions independent of carapace shape. Scute types differentiate between carapace edges and flat regions, as well as between the head region with many carapace openings and the more consistently closed abdominal region, pointing at a constructional commonality or constraint shared by all boxfish species. However, the dimensions of edge scutes varied systematically with carapace shape (e.g., scute aspect ratio tended to increase with decreasing carapace height). This suggests that protection is maintained across body forms by managing scute- and carapace-level mechanisms for increasing bending resistance. Future studies on other taxa are necessary to understand whether these architectural principles are specific evolutionary solutions for building a boxfish carapace or whether they are shared by other biological systems that serve a similar protective function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Biology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"1571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07119-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07119-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

棋盘格(硬瓷砖阵列的表面结构)在自然和人工设计中都很常见。箱鱼(Ostracioidea)几乎完全被包裹在棋盘格状的甲壳中,并进化出了大量的横截面甲壳形状,但构造这些甲壳的鳞片是否表现出类似的变化还不得而知。利用高分辨率显微 CT 和半自动分割算法,我们定量研究了 13 个不同体形物种的数千个鳞片。聚类分析显示,某些鳞片类型与特定的躯壳区域相关,与躯壳形状无关。鳞片类型区分了鳞片边缘和平坦区域,也区分了鳞片开口较多的头部区域和较为一致的封闭腹部区域,这表明所有黄箱鱼物种在构造上都有共性或限制。然而,边缘鳞片的尺寸随着躯壳形状的变化而系统地变化(例如,鳞片长宽比往往随着躯壳高度的降低而增加)。这表明,不同体型的鱼类通过管理鳞片和甲壳层面的机制来增加抗弯强度,从而保持保护作用。未来有必要对其他类群进行研究,以了解这些结构原理是否是建造箱鱼甲壳的特定进化解决方案,或者是否为其他具有类似保护功能的生物系统所共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative architecture of the tessellated boxfish (Ostracioidea) carapace.

Tessellations (surface architectures of arrays of hard tiles) are common in natural and man-made designs. Boxfishes (Ostracioidea) are almost completely encased in a tessellated armor and have evolved a plethora of cross-sectional carapace shapes, yet whether the scutes constructing these exhibit comparable variation is unknown. Using high-resolution microCT and semi-automatic segmentation algorithms, we quantitatively examined thousands of scutes from 13 species of diverse body form. A cluster analysis revealed that certain scute types are associated with specific carapace regions independent of carapace shape. Scute types differentiate between carapace edges and flat regions, as well as between the head region with many carapace openings and the more consistently closed abdominal region, pointing at a constructional commonality or constraint shared by all boxfish species. However, the dimensions of edge scutes varied systematically with carapace shape (e.g., scute aspect ratio tended to increase with decreasing carapace height). This suggests that protection is maintained across body forms by managing scute- and carapace-level mechanisms for increasing bending resistance. Future studies on other taxa are necessary to understand whether these architectural principles are specific evolutionary solutions for building a boxfish carapace or whether they are shared by other biological systems that serve a similar protective function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communications Biology
Communications Biology Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1233
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications Biology is an open access journal from Nature Research publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the biological sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances bringing new biological insight to a specialized area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信