{"title":"关节镜下肘关节挛缩松解术后持续被动运动时间的优化:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Xunhao Wang, Qianyuan Liu, Jiyang Tan, Jiani Wu, Haoyu Yang, Fei Xiong, Qiuwen Ying, Jingyi Mi","doi":"10.1186/s12891-024-08108-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anatomical structure of the elbow joint makes it vulnerable to contractures. While elbow arthroscopy minimizes soft tissue damage and enhances early rehabilitation, the optimal duration for postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) therapy is unclear. This retrospective study aims to establish the appropriate duration of CPM following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed postoperative outcomes from patients undergoing CPM rehabilitation for 1, 3, or 5 months. Metrics such as ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS scores, grip strength, and range of motion were assessed before surgery and at 1,3,6 and 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received 3 or 5 months of CPM therapy showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion-extension, range of motion, and functional scores (ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS) compared to the 1-month group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3- and 5-month groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 3-month CPM period is effective for patients with higher functional demands, with no additional benefit from extending therapy to 5 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing continuous passive motion duration following arthroscopic release of elbow contracture: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xunhao Wang, Qianyuan Liu, Jiyang Tan, Jiani Wu, Haoyu Yang, Fei Xiong, Qiuwen Ying, Jingyi Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-024-08108-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anatomical structure of the elbow joint makes it vulnerable to contractures. While elbow arthroscopy minimizes soft tissue damage and enhances early rehabilitation, the optimal duration for postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) therapy is unclear. This retrospective study aims to establish the appropriate duration of CPM following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed postoperative outcomes from patients undergoing CPM rehabilitation for 1, 3, or 5 months. Metrics such as ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS scores, grip strength, and range of motion were assessed before surgery and at 1,3,6 and 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received 3 or 5 months of CPM therapy showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion-extension, range of motion, and functional scores (ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS) compared to the 1-month group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3- and 5-month groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 3-month CPM period is effective for patients with higher functional demands, with no additional benefit from extending therapy to 5 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08108-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08108-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing continuous passive motion duration following arthroscopic release of elbow contracture: a retrospective study.
Background: The anatomical structure of the elbow joint makes it vulnerable to contractures. While elbow arthroscopy minimizes soft tissue damage and enhances early rehabilitation, the optimal duration for postoperative Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) therapy is unclear. This retrospective study aims to establish the appropriate duration of CPM following arthroscopic elbow contracture release.
Methods: We analyzed postoperative outcomes from patients undergoing CPM rehabilitation for 1, 3, or 5 months. Metrics such as ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS scores, grip strength, and range of motion were assessed before surgery and at 1,3,6 and 12 months post-surgery.
Results: Patients who received 3 or 5 months of CPM therapy showed statistically significant improvements in elbow flexion-extension, range of motion, and functional scores (ASES, VAS, DASH, MEPS) compared to the 1-month group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3- and 5-month groups.
Conclusions: A 3-month CPM period is effective for patients with higher functional demands, with no additional benefit from extending therapy to 5 months.
期刊介绍:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.