初产妇胎盘部位与引产成功率的关系

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Omima T Taha, Hanan M Ghoneim, Tyseer Marzouk, Tamer Yehia M Ali
{"title":"初产妇胎盘部位与引产成功率的关系","authors":"Omima T Taha, Hanan M Ghoneim, Tyseer Marzouk, Tamer Yehia M Ali","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07765-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the association between placental site and successful labor induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited all postdate primiparous women undergoing induction of labor. Eligible women were subjected to proper history taking and clinical examination. Vaginal examination to determine the bishop score was done. Routine antenatal scan was done for fetal biometry and the placental site. Transvaginal ultrasound was done for cervical length assessment. Induction of labor was commenced and women were subdivided into those with successful induction (delivered vaginally) and those with failed induction (needed cesarean delivery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful induction was achieved in 73/91 (80.2%) participants. The bishop score was significantly increased among women with successful induction (4.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 1.1, p value 0.014). In addition, the cervical length was significantly shorter among those who delivered vaginally (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.2 ± 0.5, p value 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the placental site among women with failed or successful induction. The cervical length was the only significant predictor for successful induction of labor (p value 0.0001). The placental site showed a non-significant role in the prediction of successful vaginal delivery (p value 0.280).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The placental site is not associated with the outcome of labor induction. The cervical length was the significant predictor for successful induction of labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between placental site and successful induction of labor among postdate primiparous women.\",\"authors\":\"Omima T Taha, Hanan M Ghoneim, Tyseer Marzouk, Tamer Yehia M Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07765-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the association between placental site and successful labor induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited all postdate primiparous women undergoing induction of labor. Eligible women were subjected to proper history taking and clinical examination. Vaginal examination to determine the bishop score was done. Routine antenatal scan was done for fetal biometry and the placental site. Transvaginal ultrasound was done for cervical length assessment. Induction of labor was commenced and women were subdivided into those with successful induction (delivered vaginally) and those with failed induction (needed cesarean delivery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Successful induction was achieved in 73/91 (80.2%) participants. The bishop score was significantly increased among women with successful induction (4.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 1.1, p value 0.014). In addition, the cervical length was significantly shorter among those who delivered vaginally (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.2 ± 0.5, p value 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the placental site among women with failed or successful induction. The cervical length was the only significant predictor for successful induction of labor (p value 0.0001). The placental site showed a non-significant role in the prediction of successful vaginal delivery (p value 0.280).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The placental site is not associated with the outcome of labor induction. The cervical length was the significant predictor for successful induction of labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07765-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07765-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定胎盘部位与引产成功之间的关系:这项横断面研究招募了所有进行引产的初产妇。符合条件的妇女均接受了适当的病史采集和临床检查。进行阴道检查以确定 bishop 评分。进行常规产前扫描,以确定胎儿的生物测量值和胎盘部位。经阴道超声波检查用于评估宫颈长度。开始引产,并将产妇细分为引产成功(阴道分娩)和引产失败(需要剖宫产):结果:73/91(80.2%)名参与者引产成功。引产成功的妇女的 bishop 评分明显提高(4.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 1.1,P 值 0.014)。此外,阴道分娩的产妇宫颈长度明显较短(2.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.2 ± 0.5,P 值 0.0001)。引产失败和引产成功的产妇在胎盘部位上没有明显差异。宫颈长度是预测引产成功与否的唯一重要指标(P 值为 0.0001)。胎盘部位在预测成功阴道分娩方面的作用不显著(P 值为 0.280):结论:胎盘部位与引产结果无关。结论:胎盘部位与引产结果无关,宫颈长度是成功引产的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between placental site and successful induction of labor among postdate primiparous women.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the association between placental site and successful labor induction.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited all postdate primiparous women undergoing induction of labor. Eligible women were subjected to proper history taking and clinical examination. Vaginal examination to determine the bishop score was done. Routine antenatal scan was done for fetal biometry and the placental site. Transvaginal ultrasound was done for cervical length assessment. Induction of labor was commenced and women were subdivided into those with successful induction (delivered vaginally) and those with failed induction (needed cesarean delivery).

Results: Successful induction was achieved in 73/91 (80.2%) participants. The bishop score was significantly increased among women with successful induction (4.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.9 ± 1.1, p value 0.014). In addition, the cervical length was significantly shorter among those who delivered vaginally (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.2 ± 0.5, p value 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the placental site among women with failed or successful induction. The cervical length was the only significant predictor for successful induction of labor (p value 0.0001). The placental site showed a non-significant role in the prediction of successful vaginal delivery (p value 0.280).

Conclusion: The placental site is not associated with the outcome of labor induction. The cervical length was the significant predictor for successful induction of labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信