英格兰股骨假体周围骨折术后情况:患者概况和短期疗效

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Mohammad Aryaie , Jonathan Thomas Evans , Mike Reed , Cliff L Shelton , Antony Johansen , Toby O Smith , Jonathan Benn , Mark Baxter , Paul Aylin , Michael R Whitehouse , Alex Bottle , PROFOUND study team
{"title":"英格兰股骨假体周围骨折术后情况:患者概况和短期疗效","authors":"Mohammad Aryaie ,&nbsp;Jonathan Thomas Evans ,&nbsp;Mike Reed ,&nbsp;Cliff L Shelton ,&nbsp;Antony Johansen ,&nbsp;Toby O Smith ,&nbsp;Jonathan Benn ,&nbsp;Mark Baxter ,&nbsp;Paul Aylin ,&nbsp;Michael R Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Alex Bottle ,&nbsp;PROFOUND study team","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) present a growing challenge for healthcare services, but there are limited national data on patient profiles, short-term outcomes, and post-discharge follow-up. We aimed to fill these gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), we identified POPFF discharges from hospitals in England for patients aged 18 and above between April 2016 and December 2022. We flagged prior admissions for hip fracture and elective hip or knee replacement surgery (primary, revision or re-revision) between April 2000 and the day of the POPFF admission date. We extracted information on patient factors, treatment modes for POPFF (nonoperative, fixation, revision), and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission). We used outpatient data to summarise post-hospitalisation follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 39,035 cases, 65.9% were female; the median age was 82 years. HES data identified that 34.0% had previously undergone elective hip replacement, 26.2% elective knee replacement, and 22.8% surgery for hip fracture. Those with a prior hip fracture were more likely to have delirium during the index POPFF admission, and, compared with those with a prior elective hip or knee replacement, they faced higher in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 3.2% and 3.6%, respectively), rates of readmission (15.4% vs 13.1% and 12.8%, respectively), and hip re-fracture after POPFF (2.9% vs 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively). Their median length of stay was longer (16 vs 14 days, p&lt;0.001). The most common reason for hospital readmission following POPFF was another fracture (11.3% of all readmissions). Overall, 74% of patients were discharged from outpatient follow-up within 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first national description of the burden of adverse outcomes for people with POPFF in England, of whom a large proportion require ongoing specialist support. Fewer POPFF cases follow prior hip fracture surgery than elective joint replacement, but these patients face higher risks of worse outcomes. With an expected increasing incidence of POPFF, this may have considerable health service implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in England: patient profiles and short-term outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Aryaie ,&nbsp;Jonathan Thomas Evans ,&nbsp;Mike Reed ,&nbsp;Cliff L Shelton ,&nbsp;Antony Johansen ,&nbsp;Toby O Smith ,&nbsp;Jonathan Benn ,&nbsp;Mark Baxter ,&nbsp;Paul Aylin ,&nbsp;Michael R Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Alex Bottle ,&nbsp;PROFOUND study team\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) present a growing challenge for healthcare services, but there are limited national data on patient profiles, short-term outcomes, and post-discharge follow-up. We aimed to fill these gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), we identified POPFF discharges from hospitals in England for patients aged 18 and above between April 2016 and December 2022. We flagged prior admissions for hip fracture and elective hip or knee replacement surgery (primary, revision or re-revision) between April 2000 and the day of the POPFF admission date. We extracted information on patient factors, treatment modes for POPFF (nonoperative, fixation, revision), and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission). We used outpatient data to summarise post-hospitalisation follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 39,035 cases, 65.9% were female; the median age was 82 years. HES data identified that 34.0% had previously undergone elective hip replacement, 26.2% elective knee replacement, and 22.8% surgery for hip fracture. Those with a prior hip fracture were more likely to have delirium during the index POPFF admission, and, compared with those with a prior elective hip or knee replacement, they faced higher in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 3.2% and 3.6%, respectively), rates of readmission (15.4% vs 13.1% and 12.8%, respectively), and hip re-fracture after POPFF (2.9% vs 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively). Their median length of stay was longer (16 vs 14 days, p&lt;0.001). The most common reason for hospital readmission following POPFF was another fracture (11.3% of all readmissions). Overall, 74% of patients were discharged from outpatient follow-up within 12 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This is the first national description of the burden of adverse outcomes for people with POPFF in England, of whom a large proportion require ongoing specialist support. Fewer POPFF cases follow prior hip fracture surgery than elective joint replacement, but these patients face higher risks of worse outcomes. With an expected increasing incidence of POPFF, this may have considerable health service implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 112026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的股骨假体周围骨折(POPFF)术后给医疗服务带来了越来越大的挑战,但有关患者概况、短期疗效和出院后随访的全国性数据却很有限。我们的目标是填补这些空白。方法利用医院病例统计(Hospital Episode Statistics,HES),我们确定了英格兰医院在 2016 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间出院的 18 岁及以上 POPFF 患者。我们标记了 2000 年 4 月至 POPFF 入院日之间因髋部骨折和择期髋关节或膝关节置换手术(初次、翻修或再次翻修)入院的患者。我们提取了有关患者因素、POPFF 治疗模式(非手术、固定、翻修)和结果(院内死亡率、住院时间、计划外再入院)的信息。我们利用门诊数据总结了住院后的随访情况。结果 在 39035 个病例中,65.9% 为女性;中位年龄为 82 岁。HES数据显示,34.0%的患者曾接受过选择性髋关节置换术,26.2%接受过选择性膝关节置换术,22.8%接受过髋部骨折手术。与之前接受过择期髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者相比,他们面临更高的院内死亡率(分别为 5.1% vs 3.2% 和 3.6%)、再入院率(分别为 15.4% vs 13.1% 和 12.8%)和髋关节骨折后的再骨折率(分别为 2.9% vs 1.2% 和 1.6%)。他们的中位住院时间更长(16 天 vs 14 天,p<0.001)。POPFF 术后再次入院的最常见原因是再次骨折(占再次入院总数的 11.3%)。总体而言,74%的患者在12个月内从门诊随访中出院。结论:这是英国首次对POPFF患者不良后果负担的全国性描述,其中很大一部分患者需要持续的专科支持。与选择性关节置换术相比,髋部骨折术后的 POPFF 病例更少,但这些患者面临的不良后果风险更高。预计 POPFF 的发病率会越来越高,这可能会对医疗服务产生相当大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in England: patient profiles and short-term outcomes

Background and objective

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) present a growing challenge for healthcare services, but there are limited national data on patient profiles, short-term outcomes, and post-discharge follow-up. We aimed to fill these gaps.

Methods

Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), we identified POPFF discharges from hospitals in England for patients aged 18 and above between April 2016 and December 2022. We flagged prior admissions for hip fracture and elective hip or knee replacement surgery (primary, revision or re-revision) between April 2000 and the day of the POPFF admission date. We extracted information on patient factors, treatment modes for POPFF (nonoperative, fixation, revision), and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission). We used outpatient data to summarise post-hospitalisation follow-up.

Results

Of 39,035 cases, 65.9% were female; the median age was 82 years. HES data identified that 34.0% had previously undergone elective hip replacement, 26.2% elective knee replacement, and 22.8% surgery for hip fracture. Those with a prior hip fracture were more likely to have delirium during the index POPFF admission, and, compared with those with a prior elective hip or knee replacement, they faced higher in-hospital mortality (5.1% vs 3.2% and 3.6%, respectively), rates of readmission (15.4% vs 13.1% and 12.8%, respectively), and hip re-fracture after POPFF (2.9% vs 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively). Their median length of stay was longer (16 vs 14 days, p<0.001). The most common reason for hospital readmission following POPFF was another fracture (11.3% of all readmissions). Overall, 74% of patients were discharged from outpatient follow-up within 12 months.

Conclusion

This is the first national description of the burden of adverse outcomes for people with POPFF in England, of whom a large proportion require ongoing specialist support. Fewer POPFF cases follow prior hip fracture surgery than elective joint replacement, but these patients face higher risks of worse outcomes. With an expected increasing incidence of POPFF, this may have considerable health service implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信