测试球状碳质颗粒 (SCP) 在极低浓度下的定量假设:对地质档案年代测定的影响

IF 3.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Emma D. Henderson, Ann S. Ojeda, Richard S. Vachula
{"title":"测试球状碳质颗粒 (SCP) 在极低浓度下的定量假设:对地质档案年代测定的影响","authors":"Emma D. Henderson,&nbsp;Ann S. Ojeda,&nbsp;Richard S. Vachula","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when &lt;10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 109092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing assumptions of spheroidal carbonaceous particle (SCP) quantification at very low concentrations: Implications for dating geologic archives\",\"authors\":\"Emma D. Henderson,&nbsp;Ann S. Ojeda,&nbsp;Richard S. Vachula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when &lt;10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124005948\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124005948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

球状碳质颗粒(SCPs)保存在湖泊沉积物、冰芯或泥炭地等地质档案中,可以为岩心提供年代学。SCP 只在煤和燃油燃烧过程中产生,因此是工业化开始的可靠全球标志,可用于追踪这些来源的沉积物。虽然将 SCPs 用作近代沉积物中的年代地层指标很常见,但量化其沉积物浓度的枚举法却几乎没有改变,并假定一个子样本就能代表整个沉积物样本。我们通过分析多个子样本来确定 SCP 浓度测量的精度和准确性,从而检验这一假设并探讨其对 SCP 年代测定法的影响。值得注意的是,我们并没有使用传统的 SCP 定量方法,而是将重点放在了浓度较低、SCP 较大的样本上,这与文献中通常的定量方法有所不同。不过,我们的结论和推论是基于分析子取样对 SCP 数量(计数)的影响所获得的启示,这些启示可转化为所有尺寸和依赖颗粒计数的 SCP 定量方法。我们对 14 个沿河地点(n = 420)的 30 个子样本进行了 SCP 定量。SCP 浓度各不相同(0 SCPs/gDM - 2141±825 SCPs/gDM),但反映了其他环境背景下现代沉积物中 SCP 浓度的典型量化范围。对于每个地点,我们使用引导法(bootstrapping method)逼近 1-30 个子样本大小的 SCP 理论平均值,然后比较理论平均值和相对标准偏差。我们发现,每个样本枚举 10 个子样本比枚举 1 个子样本更能代表 SCP 的理论平均值,尤其是 SCP 浓度较低的样本。当测量到的 SCPs/gDM 少于 10 个子样时,误报不含 SCPs 的几率最大,这表明更多的重复样本可以为基于 SCP 的地质档案年代测定提供更大的可信度。如果出于测年目的而划定 SCP 存在的地层起始点,我们建议对 SCP 浓度较低的样本至少列举 10 个子样本,以确保这些测量结果的可靠性。我们承认列举多个子样本需要大量的时间和资源,但我们提供了一些策略(例如限制子样本的取样)来最大限度地降低额外成本,并认为在古环境研究中,在测年可靠性方面的优势要大于成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing assumptions of spheroidal carbonaceous particle (SCP) quantification at very low concentrations: Implications for dating geologic archives
Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when <10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Reviews
Quaternary Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信