Emma D. Henderson, Ann S. Ojeda, Richard S. Vachula
{"title":"测试球状碳质颗粒 (SCP) 在极低浓度下的定量假设:对地质档案年代测定的影响","authors":"Emma D. Henderson, Ann S. Ojeda, Richard S. Vachula","doi":"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when <10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20926,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Reviews","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 109092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing assumptions of spheroidal carbonaceous particle (SCP) quantification at very low concentrations: Implications for dating geologic archives\",\"authors\":\"Emma D. Henderson, Ann S. Ojeda, Richard S. Vachula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when <10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124005948\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379124005948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing assumptions of spheroidal carbonaceous particle (SCP) quantification at very low concentrations: Implications for dating geologic archives
Spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs) are preserved in geologic archives such as lake sediments, ice cores, or peatlands, and can provide chronology for cores. SCPs are only produced during the combustion of coal and fuel oil, so they are a reliable global marker of the onset of industrialization and can be used to track deposition from these sources. While the usage of SCPs as chronostratigraphic indicators in recent sediments is common, the enumerative method of quantifying their sedimentary concentrations has remained virtually unchanged, and assumes that one subsample is representative of the entire sediment sample. We test this assumption and explore its implications for the SCP chronological method of dating recent sediments by analyzing multiple subsamples to characterize the precision and accuracy of SCP concentration measurements. Notably, we do not use the conventional SCP quantification method and focus on samples with lower concentrations and larger SCPs than are typically quantified in the literature. However, we base our conclusions and inferences on insights gained from analyses of the effects of subsampling on SCP numerosity (counts), which are translatable insights to all sizes and methods of SCPs quantification which rely on particle counts. We quantified SCPs in sets of 30 subsamples for 14 riverine sites (n = 420). SCP concentrations varied (0 SCPs/gDM – 2141±825 SCPs/gDM), but reflect the typical ranges of SCP concentrations quantified in modern sediments in other environmental settings. For each site, we used a bootstrapping method to approximate the theoretical mean of SCPs at 1–30 subsample sizes, then compared the theoretical mean and relative standard deviation. We found that enumerating 10 subsamples per sample better represents the theoretical mean of SCPs than the enumeration of 1 subsample, especially for lower SCP concentration samples. The greatest chance for falsely reporting the absence of SCPs was when <10 SCPs/gDM were measured in fewer than 10 subsamples, indicating that more replicates could provide greater confidence in SCP-based dating of geologic archives. If aiming to delineate the stratigraphic onset of SCP presence for dating purposes, we recommend enumerating a minimum of 10 subsamples for samples with low SCP concentrations to ensure the reliability of these measurements. We acknowledge that enumerating multiple subsamples is time and resource intensive, but provide some strategies (e.g., limiting subsampling) for minimizing additional cost and argue that the advantages afforded for dating reliability outweigh the costs in paleoenvironmental research.
期刊介绍:
Quaternary Science Reviews caters for all aspects of Quaternary science, and includes, for example, geology, geomorphology, geography, archaeology, soil science, palaeobotany, palaeontology, palaeoclimatology and the full range of applicable dating methods. The dividing line between what constitutes the review paper and one which contains new original data is not easy to establish, so QSR also publishes papers with new data especially if these perform a review function. All the Quaternary sciences are changing rapidly and subject to re-evaluation as the pace of discovery quickens; thus the diverse but comprehensive role of Quaternary Science Reviews keeps readers abreast of the wider issues relating to new developments in the field.