Zainab Ahmad Ramadan (Zainab A. Ramadan), Amel Helmy Elmorsy (Amel Helmy), Saher Ebrahim Taman (Saher Taman), Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar (FA Denewar)
{"title":"骨报告和数据系统(Bone-RADS)在解读计算机断层扫描骨肿瘤方面的观察者间和观察者内一致性","authors":"Zainab Ahmad Ramadan (Zainab A. Ramadan), Amel Helmy Elmorsy (Amel Helmy), Saher Ebrahim Taman (Saher Taman), Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar (FA Denewar)","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess inter-observer & intra-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology (ACR) bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography (CT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 273 bone tumors 184 (67.4 %) benign and 89 (32.6 %) malignant. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the CT images to assess the defined CT features of bone lesions and assign a bone-RADS category. A third observer reviewed the CT images twice with one month interval and reported the specified CT features and final bone-RADS category for bone lesions. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone-RADS were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was almost perfect inter-observer agreement between the two reviewers for all defined variables as well as bone-RADS categories (Kappa = 92.2 %). Overall intra-observer agreement was also perfect for all defined CT features and bone RADS categories with higher percentage than inter-observer one (κ = 98.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bone-RADS is an effective clinical tool for practicing radiologists in the risk assessment and management of bone tumors with perfect agreement among observers. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted for assessing reliability or validity of the recent ACR Bone-RADS using CT. Hence, this study could serve as a cornerstone for further upcoming studies to assess the reproducibility and validity of the ACR Bone-RADS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 110367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Ahmad Ramadan (Zainab A. Ramadan), Amel Helmy Elmorsy (Amel Helmy), Saher Ebrahim Taman (Saher Taman), Fatmaelzahraa Abdelfattah Denewar (FA Denewar)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess inter-observer & intra-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology (ACR) bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography (CT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 273 bone tumors 184 (67.4 %) benign and 89 (32.6 %) malignant. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the CT images to assess the defined CT features of bone lesions and assign a bone-RADS category. A third observer reviewed the CT images twice with one month interval and reported the specified CT features and final bone-RADS category for bone lesions. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone-RADS were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was almost perfect inter-observer agreement between the two reviewers for all defined variables as well as bone-RADS categories (Kappa = 92.2 %). Overall intra-observer agreement was also perfect for all defined CT features and bone RADS categories with higher percentage than inter-observer one (κ = 98.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Bone-RADS is an effective clinical tool for practicing radiologists in the risk assessment and management of bone tumors with perfect agreement among observers. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted for assessing reliability or validity of the recent ACR Bone-RADS using CT. Hence, this study could serve as a cornerstone for further upcoming studies to assess the reproducibility and validity of the ACR Bone-RADS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110367\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002973\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002973","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography
Objective
To assess inter-observer & intra-observer agreement of the American College of Radiology (ACR) bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) in the interpretation of bone tumors on computed tomography (CT).
Methods
This retrospective study included 273 bone tumors 184 (67.4 %) benign and 89 (32.6 %) malignant. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed the CT images to assess the defined CT features of bone lesions and assign a bone-RADS category. A third observer reviewed the CT images twice with one month interval and reported the specified CT features and final bone-RADS category for bone lesions. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of bone-RADS were analyzed.
Results
There was almost perfect inter-observer agreement between the two reviewers for all defined variables as well as bone-RADS categories (Kappa = 92.2 %). Overall intra-observer agreement was also perfect for all defined CT features and bone RADS categories with higher percentage than inter-observer one (κ = 98.3 %).
Conclusion
Bone-RADS is an effective clinical tool for practicing radiologists in the risk assessment and management of bone tumors with perfect agreement among observers. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted for assessing reliability or validity of the recent ACR Bone-RADS using CT. Hence, this study could serve as a cornerstone for further upcoming studies to assess the reproducibility and validity of the ACR Bone-RADS.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology