针灸治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Wenqi Ren , Bo Tao , Haixia Deng
{"title":"针灸治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Wenqi Ren ,&nbsp;Bo Tao ,&nbsp;Haixia Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite numerous pharmacological and therapeutic options for sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSNHL), treatment remains challenging due to various side effects and suboptimal efficacy. Acupuncture, as a complementary and alternative therapy, has achieved some success in this field. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for SSNHL, and to seek robust evidence-based medical evidence for the therapeutic effect of acupuncture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) up to September 1, 2024. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated utilizing the risk of bias assessment tool from the Cochrane Collaboration. Risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the effect. Data analysis was used RevMan 5.3.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 randomized controlled trials involving 2,456 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results indicate that the integration of acupuncture with WMCT for SSNHL may enhance the total effective rate (RR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.14–1.23, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001), change in hearing threshold (MD=-10.71, 95% CI: -12.52 to -8.89, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001), and cure rate (RD=0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001) compared to WMCT alone. Acupuncture as a monotherapy seems to be superior to WMCT in terms of total effective rate (RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.32, <em>P</em>=0.001) and cure rate (RD=0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.19, <em>P</em>=0.01). There was no significant difference observed between acupuncture alone and WMCT in improving pure tone hearing thresholds (MD=-5.45, 95%CI: -20.75 to 9.85, <em>P</em>=0.48). While the combination of acupuncture with WMCT may offer greater efficacy in reducing tinnitus symptoms (RR=1.12, 95% CI:1.01 to 1.24, <em>P</em>=0.03), but the reliability of this outcome is contested upon sensitivity analysis (RR=1.07, 95% CI:0.87–1.31, <em>P</em>=0.51).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of the meta-analysis indicate that acupuncture, either as a standalone intervention or in conjunction with WMCT, may offer supplementary therapeutic advantages in certain respects. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the quality and potential bias of the included studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13644,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Medicine Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 101087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wenqi Ren ,&nbsp;Bo Tao ,&nbsp;Haixia Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.imr.2024.101087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite numerous pharmacological and therapeutic options for sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSNHL), treatment remains challenging due to various side effects and suboptimal efficacy. Acupuncture, as a complementary and alternative therapy, has achieved some success in this field. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for SSNHL, and to seek robust evidence-based medical evidence for the therapeutic effect of acupuncture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) up to September 1, 2024. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated utilizing the risk of bias assessment tool from the Cochrane Collaboration. Risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the effect. Data analysis was used RevMan 5.3.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 randomized controlled trials involving 2,456 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results indicate that the integration of acupuncture with WMCT for SSNHL may enhance the total effective rate (RR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.14–1.23, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001), change in hearing threshold (MD=-10.71, 95% CI: -12.52 to -8.89, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001), and cure rate (RD=0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19, <em>P</em>&lt;0.00001) compared to WMCT alone. Acupuncture as a monotherapy seems to be superior to WMCT in terms of total effective rate (RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.32, <em>P</em>=0.001) and cure rate (RD=0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.19, <em>P</em>=0.01). There was no significant difference observed between acupuncture alone and WMCT in improving pure tone hearing thresholds (MD=-5.45, 95%CI: -20.75 to 9.85, <em>P</em>=0.48). While the combination of acupuncture with WMCT may offer greater efficacy in reducing tinnitus symptoms (RR=1.12, 95% CI:1.01 to 1.24, <em>P</em>=0.03), but the reliability of this outcome is contested upon sensitivity analysis (RR=1.07, 95% CI:0.87–1.31, <em>P</em>=0.51).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings of the meta-analysis indicate that acupuncture, either as a standalone intervention or in conjunction with WMCT, may offer supplementary therapeutic advantages in certain respects. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the quality and potential bias of the included studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101087\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213422024000672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景尽管治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)的药物和疗法众多,但由于副作用大、疗效不理想等原因,治疗仍具有挑战性。针灸作为一种补充和替代疗法,在这一领域取得了一些成功。本研究旨在系统评估针灸治疗 SSNHL 的疗效和安全性,并为针灸的治疗效果寻找可靠的循证医学证据:方法检索了以下数据库:PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台、VIP信息数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)(截至2024年9月1日)。利用 Cochrane 协作组织的偏倚风险评估工具对 RCTs 的质量进行了评估。使用风险比(RR)、风险差异(RD)、平均差异(MD)和 95% 置信区间(CI)来估计效果。本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入了 28 项随机对照试验,涉及 2456 名患者。荟萃分析结果表明,与单独使用 WMCT 相比,针灸结合 WMCT 治疗 SSNHL 可提高总有效率(RR=1.18,95% CI:1.14-1.23,P<0.00001)、听阈变化(MD=-10.71,95% CI:-12.52 至 -8.89,P<0.00001)和治愈率(RD=0.15,95% CI:0.11-0.19,P<0.00001)。就总有效率(RR=1.19,95% CI:1.07-1.32,P=0.001)和治愈率(RD=0.11,95% CI:0.02-0.19,P=0.01)而言,针灸作为单一疗法似乎优于 WMCT。在改善纯音听阈方面,单用针灸与 WMCT 没有明显差异(MD=-5.45,95%CI:-20.75 至 9.85,P=0.48)。荟萃分析的结果表明,针灸作为一种独立的干预措施或与 WMCT 结合使用,在某些方面可提供辅助治疗优势。然而,由于纳入研究的质量和潜在偏倚,在解释结果时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite numerous pharmacological and therapeutic options for sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSNHL), treatment remains challenging due to various side effects and suboptimal efficacy. Acupuncture, as a complementary and alternative therapy, has achieved some success in this field. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for SSNHL, and to seek robust evidence-based medical evidence for the therapeutic effect of acupuncture.

Methods

The following databases were searched: PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed) up to September 1, 2024. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated utilizing the risk of bias assessment tool from the Cochrane Collaboration. Risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to estimate the effect. Data analysis was used RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 28 randomized controlled trials involving 2,456 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results indicate that the integration of acupuncture with WMCT for SSNHL may enhance the total effective rate (RR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.14–1.23, P<0.00001), change in hearing threshold (MD=-10.71, 95% CI: -12.52 to -8.89, P<0.00001), and cure rate (RD=0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19, P<0.00001) compared to WMCT alone. Acupuncture as a monotherapy seems to be superior to WMCT in terms of total effective rate (RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.32, P=0.001) and cure rate (RD=0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.19, P=0.01). There was no significant difference observed between acupuncture alone and WMCT in improving pure tone hearing thresholds (MD=-5.45, 95%CI: -20.75 to 9.85, P=0.48). While the combination of acupuncture with WMCT may offer greater efficacy in reducing tinnitus symptoms (RR=1.12, 95% CI:1.01 to 1.24, P=0.03), but the reliability of this outcome is contested upon sensitivity analysis (RR=1.07, 95% CI:0.87–1.31, P=0.51).

Conclusions

The findings of the meta-analysis indicate that acupuncture, either as a standalone intervention or in conjunction with WMCT, may offer supplementary therapeutic advantages in certain respects. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the quality and potential bias of the included studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Medicine Research
Integrative Medicine Research Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Integrative Medicine Research (IMR) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal focused on scientific research for integrative medicine including traditional medicine (emphasis on acupuncture and herbal medicine), complementary and alternative medicine, and systems medicine. The journal includes papers on basic research, clinical research, methodology, theory, computational analysis and modelling, topical reviews, medical history, education and policy based on physiology, pathology, diagnosis and the systems approach in the field of integrative medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信