用于分析环境水样中农药残留的绿色微萃取方法的发展:综述

IF 1.2 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Endalkachew ETANA , Birhanu MEKASSA
{"title":"用于分析环境水样中农药残留的绿色微萃取方法的发展:综述","authors":"Endalkachew ETANA ,&nbsp;Birhanu MEKASSA","doi":"10.1016/j.cjac.2024.100458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pesticide residues in water are gaining prominence as one of the most serious water quality challenges. Their analysis requires advanced sample preparation and instrumental techniques. However, there is a continuing challenge mainly because of the trace quantities as well as the high amount of interfering substances which can be co-extracted with them, frequently leading to method errors and damages the efficiency of analytical instruments. Thus, the development of greener microextraction techniques for pesticide analysis is very important since it reduces overall sample preparation time, use fewer organic solvents, produce less wastes, has adequate extraction and clean up capacity for the target analytes, and removes interferents from the complex sample that can affect instrumental performance. This paper focuses on reviewing greener microextraction methods used in the analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples. The microextraction methods include: liquid phase microextraction (LPME), solid phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and single drop microextraction (SDME). This review paper also presents the development, advantage and disadvantage, green aspects and sample preparation technique of each microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in water matrix. Moreover, the different analytical techniques used for determination of the required analyte from water matrix after extraction steps were also addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":277,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"52 11","pages":"Article 100458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A development in greener microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples: A review\",\"authors\":\"Endalkachew ETANA ,&nbsp;Birhanu MEKASSA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjac.2024.100458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pesticide residues in water are gaining prominence as one of the most serious water quality challenges. Their analysis requires advanced sample preparation and instrumental techniques. However, there is a continuing challenge mainly because of the trace quantities as well as the high amount of interfering substances which can be co-extracted with them, frequently leading to method errors and damages the efficiency of analytical instruments. Thus, the development of greener microextraction techniques for pesticide analysis is very important since it reduces overall sample preparation time, use fewer organic solvents, produce less wastes, has adequate extraction and clean up capacity for the target analytes, and removes interferents from the complex sample that can affect instrumental performance. This paper focuses on reviewing greener microextraction methods used in the analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples. The microextraction methods include: liquid phase microextraction (LPME), solid phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and single drop microextraction (SDME). This review paper also presents the development, advantage and disadvantage, green aspects and sample preparation technique of each microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in water matrix. Moreover, the different analytical techniques used for determination of the required analyte from water matrix after extraction steps were also addressed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"52 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 100458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204024001038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204024001038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水体中的农药残留作为最严峻的水质挑战之一正日益突出。对其进行分析需要先进的样品制备和仪器技术。然而,由于农药残留的痕量和大量干扰物质会与农药一起被萃取出来,从而经常导致方法错误和损害分析仪器的效率,这也是一个持续的挑战。因此,开发用于农药分析的绿色微萃取技术非常重要,因为它可以减少整个样品制备时间,减少有机溶剂的使用,减少废物的产生,对目标分析物有足够的萃取和净化能力,并能去除复杂样品中可能影响仪器性能的干扰物。本文重点评述了用于分析环境水样中农药残留的绿色微萃取方法。这些微萃取方法包括:液相微萃取(LPME)、固相微萃取(SPME)、分散液-液微萃取(DLLME)、中空纤维液相微萃取(HF-LPME)、搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)和单滴微萃取(SDME)。本文还介绍了每种微萃取方法的发展、优缺点、绿色环保方面以及用于分析水基质中农药残留的样品制备技术。此外,还介绍了用于测定萃取步骤后水基质中所需分析物的不同分析技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A development in greener microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples: A review

A development in greener microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples: A review
Pesticide residues in water are gaining prominence as one of the most serious water quality challenges. Their analysis requires advanced sample preparation and instrumental techniques. However, there is a continuing challenge mainly because of the trace quantities as well as the high amount of interfering substances which can be co-extracted with them, frequently leading to method errors and damages the efficiency of analytical instruments. Thus, the development of greener microextraction techniques for pesticide analysis is very important since it reduces overall sample preparation time, use fewer organic solvents, produce less wastes, has adequate extraction and clean up capacity for the target analytes, and removes interferents from the complex sample that can affect instrumental performance. This paper focuses on reviewing greener microextraction methods used in the analysis of pesticide residues in environmental water samples. The microextraction methods include: liquid phase microextraction (LPME), solid phase microextraction (SPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and single drop microextraction (SDME). This review paper also presents the development, advantage and disadvantage, green aspects and sample preparation technique of each microextraction methods for analysis of pesticide residues in water matrix. Moreover, the different analytical techniques used for determination of the required analyte from water matrix after extraction steps were also addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17223
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry(CJAC) is an academic journal of analytical chemistry established in 1972 and sponsored by the Chinese Chemical Society and Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Its objectives are to report the original scientific research achievements and review the recent development of analytical chemistry in all areas. The journal sets up 5 columns including Research Papers, Research Notes, Experimental Technique and Instrument, Review and Progress and Summary Accounts. The journal published monthly in Chinese language. A detailed abstract, keywords and the titles of figures and tables are provided in English, except column of Summary Accounts. Prof. Wang Erkang, an outstanding analytical chemist, academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences & Third World Academy of Sciences, holds the post of the Editor-in-chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信