F. Grimm , M. Walcker , L. Milosevic , G. Naros , B. Bender , D. Weiss , A. Gharabaghi
{"title":"与感觉运动皮层的强连接性可预测丘脑深部脑刺激对本质性震颤的临床疗效","authors":"F. Grimm , M. Walcker , L. Milosevic , G. Naros , B. Bender , D. Weiss , A. Gharabaghi","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 103709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor\",\"authors\":\"F. Grimm , M. Walcker , L. Milosevic , G. Naros , B. Bender , D. Weiss , A. Gharabaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor
Introduction
The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.
Objective
To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.
Methods
Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.
Results
The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.
Conclusion
Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.
期刊介绍:
NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging.
The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.