与感觉运动皮层的强连接性可预测丘脑深部脑刺激对本质性震颤的临床疗效

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
F. Grimm , M. Walcker , L. Milosevic , G. Naros , B. Bender , D. Weiss , A. Gharabaghi
{"title":"与感觉运动皮层的强连接性可预测丘脑深部脑刺激对本质性震颤的临床疗效","authors":"F. Grimm ,&nbsp;M. Walcker ,&nbsp;L. Milosevic ,&nbsp;G. Naros ,&nbsp;B. Bender ,&nbsp;D. Weiss ,&nbsp;A. Gharabaghi","doi":"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p &lt; 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54359,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage-Clinical","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 103709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor\",\"authors\":\"F. Grimm ,&nbsp;M. Walcker ,&nbsp;L. Milosevic ,&nbsp;G. Naros ,&nbsp;B. Bender ,&nbsp;D. Weiss ,&nbsp;A. Gharabaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p &lt; 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage-Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage-Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158224001505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言丘脑深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗本质性震颤(ET)的疗效各不相同,这可能是由于难以确定 DBS 放置的最佳靶区。最近的方法将临床反应与基于连接性的靶区分割进行了比较。目的确定与 ET DBS 临床有效靶区相对应的连通性特征。方法对 20 名接受双侧丘脑 DBS 治疗的 ET 患者进行患者特异性概率弥散张量成像。在单极检查后,对每个半球最有效触点的刺激反应进行了分类,分为完全上肢震颤抑制和不完全上肢震颤抑制(40 次评估)。最后,对这些触点在大脑皮层和小脑震颤网络中的连接情况进行估计,并在组间进行比较。结果导致完全震颤抑制(25 人)与不完全震颤抑制(15 人)的主动联系与 M1(p < 0.001)、躯体感觉皮层(p = 0.008)、小脑前叶(p = 0.026)和 SMA(p = 0.05)的连接性明显更高;Cohen's(d)效应大小分别为 0.53、0.42、0.25 和 0.10。结论DBS治疗ET的临床疗效与分布式连接特征相符,其中与感觉运动皮层的连接最为相关。为了证实这些研究结果的可靠性,有必要在更大的队列中进行长期随访,并在样本外数据中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strong connectivity to the sensorimotor cortex predicts clinical effectiveness of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor

Introduction

The outcome of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) varies, probably due to the difficulty in identifying the optimal target for DBS placement. Recent approaches compared the clinical response with a connectivity-based segmentation of the target area. However, studies are contradictory by indicating the connectivity to the primary motor cortex (M1) or to the premotor/supplementary motor cortex (SMA) to be therapeutically relevant.

Objective

To identify the connectivity profile that corresponds to clinical effective targeting of DBS for ET.

Methods

Patient-specific probabilistic diffusion tensor imaging was performed in 20 ET patients with bilateral thalamic DBS. Following monopolar review, the stimulation response was classified for the most effective contact in each hemisphere as complete vs. incomplete upper limb tremor suppression (40 assessments). Finally, the connectivity profiles of these contacts within the cortical and cerebellar tremor network were estimated and compared between groups.

Results

The active contacts that led to complete (n = 25) vs. incomplete (n = 15) tremor suppression showed significantly higher connectivity to M1 (p < 0.001), somatosensory cortex (p = 0.008), anterior lobe of the cerebellum (p = 0.026) and SMA (p = 0.05); with Cohen’s (d) effect sizes of 0.53, 0.42, 0.25 and 0.10, respectively. The clinical benefits were achieved without requiring higher stimulation intensities or causing additional side effects.

Conclusion

Clinical effectiveness of DBS for ET corresponded to a distributed connectivity profile, with the connection to the sensorimotor cortex being most relevant. Long-term follow-up in larger cohorts and replication in out-of-sample data are necessary to confirm the robustness of these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage-Clinical
Neuroimage-Clinical NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
368
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage: Clinical, a journal of diseases, disorders and syndromes involving the Nervous System, provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in the study of abnormal structure-function relationships of the human nervous system based on imaging. The focus of NeuroImage: Clinical is on defining changes to the brain associated with primary neurologic and psychiatric diseases and disorders of the nervous system as well as behavioral syndromes and developmental conditions. The main criterion for judging papers is the extent of scientific advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of diseases and disorders, in identification of functional models that link clinical signs and symptoms with brain function and in the creation of image based tools applicable to a broad range of clinical needs including diagnosis, monitoring and tracking of illness, predicting therapeutic response and development of new treatments. Papers dealing with structure and function in animal models will also be considered if they reveal mechanisms that can be readily translated to human conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信