Elysia Grose , Jenny B. Xiao , Evan Fang , Brigitte Routhier-Chevrier , Jennifer M. Siu , Nikolaus E. Wolter
{"title":"内窥镜鼻窦手术对颅内窦源性感染儿科患者的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Elysia Grose , Jenny B. Xiao , Evan Fang , Brigitte Routhier-Chevrier , Jennifer M. Siu , Nikolaus E. Wolter","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on the outcomes of pediatric patients with sinogenic intracranial infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for articles that described the outcomes in pediatric patients who had intracranial complications of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and underwent ESS with or without open neurosurgical approaches (ONA) or external sinus approaches (ESA). Primary outcomes of interest include mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight articles met the final eligibility criteria, totaling 710 pediatric patients and 905 intracranial complications. The most common complications were subdural empyema (n = 261, 29 %), epidural abscess (n = 213, 24 %), and Pott's Puffy tumor (PPT) (n = 95, 10 %). When comparing patients who underwent ESS (alone or combined with ONA) to those who underwent ONA only, there was a decreased risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.38–1.12 and RR = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.36–1.09, respectively) and decreased risk of neurological sequelae (RR = 0.65, 95 % CI = 0.15–2.74 and RR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.20–1.26, respectively), however these differences were not statistically significant. When patients who underwent combined intervention were compared to ESS only, the risk of revision surgery (RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.62–1.72) and neurological sequelae (RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.37–2.64) were similar. Risk of mortality was minimal and similar across all interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current study including primarily small retrospective studies found no statistically significant differences between children who received ESS alone, ESS with ONA or ONA alone, on mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Although ESS may be beneficial for managing certain pediatric sinogenic intracranial infections, its true effectiveness is difficult to determine due to the variability in the types of intracranial complications and the inconsistent extent of ESS procedures reported in the literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 112176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of endoscopic sinus surgery in pediatric patients with sinogenic intracranial infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Elysia Grose , Jenny B. Xiao , Evan Fang , Brigitte Routhier-Chevrier , Jennifer M. Siu , Nikolaus E. Wolter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on the outcomes of pediatric patients with sinogenic intracranial infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for articles that described the outcomes in pediatric patients who had intracranial complications of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and underwent ESS with or without open neurosurgical approaches (ONA) or external sinus approaches (ESA). Primary outcomes of interest include mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-eight articles met the final eligibility criteria, totaling 710 pediatric patients and 905 intracranial complications. The most common complications were subdural empyema (n = 261, 29 %), epidural abscess (n = 213, 24 %), and Pott's Puffy tumor (PPT) (n = 95, 10 %). When comparing patients who underwent ESS (alone or combined with ONA) to those who underwent ONA only, there was a decreased risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.38–1.12 and RR = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.36–1.09, respectively) and decreased risk of neurological sequelae (RR = 0.65, 95 % CI = 0.15–2.74 and RR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.20–1.26, respectively), however these differences were not statistically significant. When patients who underwent combined intervention were compared to ESS only, the risk of revision surgery (RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.62–1.72) and neurological sequelae (RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.37–2.64) were similar. Risk of mortality was minimal and similar across all interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The current study including primarily small retrospective studies found no statistically significant differences between children who received ESS alone, ESS with ONA or ONA alone, on mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Although ESS may be beneficial for managing certain pediatric sinogenic intracranial infections, its true effectiveness is difficult to determine due to the variability in the types of intracranial complications and the inconsistent extent of ESS procedures reported in the literature.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"187 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624003306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624003306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of endoscopic sinus surgery in pediatric patients with sinogenic intracranial infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective
This review aims to elucidate the role of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on the outcomes of pediatric patients with sinogenic intracranial infections.
Methods
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for articles that described the outcomes in pediatric patients who had intracranial complications of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and underwent ESS with or without open neurosurgical approaches (ONA) or external sinus approaches (ESA). Primary outcomes of interest include mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.
Results
Forty-eight articles met the final eligibility criteria, totaling 710 pediatric patients and 905 intracranial complications. The most common complications were subdural empyema (n = 261, 29 %), epidural abscess (n = 213, 24 %), and Pott's Puffy tumor (PPT) (n = 95, 10 %). When comparing patients who underwent ESS (alone or combined with ONA) to those who underwent ONA only, there was a decreased risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.38–1.12 and RR = 0.63, 95 % CI = 0.36–1.09, respectively) and decreased risk of neurological sequelae (RR = 0.65, 95 % CI = 0.15–2.74 and RR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.20–1.26, respectively), however these differences were not statistically significant. When patients who underwent combined intervention were compared to ESS only, the risk of revision surgery (RR = 1.04, 95 % CI = 0.62–1.72) and neurological sequelae (RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.37–2.64) were similar. Risk of mortality was minimal and similar across all interventions.
Conclusion
The current study including primarily small retrospective studies found no statistically significant differences between children who received ESS alone, ESS with ONA or ONA alone, on mortality, revision surgery, length of stay and neurological sequelae. Although ESS may be beneficial for managing certain pediatric sinogenic intracranial infections, its true effectiveness is difficult to determine due to the variability in the types of intracranial complications and the inconsistent extent of ESS procedures reported in the literature.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.