{"title":"多源信息融合,加强激光粉末床熔融快速成型制造的过程质量监控","authors":"Tao Shen , Bo Li , Jianrui Zhang , Fuzhen Xuan","doi":"10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the process-induced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the L-PBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, L-PBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7172,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 104575"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Tao Shen , Bo Li , Jianrui Zhang , Fuzhen Xuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addma.2024.104575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the process-induced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the L-PBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, L-PBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Additive manufacturing\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Additive manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860424006213\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860424006213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-source information fusion for enhanced in-process quality monitoring of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
Defects such as lack of fusion, porosity, and keyhole generated during the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing process pose a challenge, with the absence of effective prediction methods for the process-induced defects and as-printed quality. On-line monitoring becomes imperative to evaluate and enhance the L-PBF in-process quality. Here, a multi-source information fusion strategy using a residual network (ResNet) is introduced for the in-process monitoring during the L-PBF. This approach integrates the melt-pool infrared (IR) images captured layer-by-layer, melt-track top-view photographs, melt-track numerical simulation diagrams, L-PBF process parameters, and characteristic parameters of melt-pool cross-sectional morphology after solidification to enable quality monitoring of the L-PBF processing. To assess the defect severity, a quantitative defect evaluation method based on the defect-specific characteristics is proposed. This method facilitates the quantitative evaluation of defects by extracting pertinent defect indicators related to porosity and deformation. Additionally, two types of residual physical hybrid networks (ResPHN) and two types of residual physical fusion supervisory networks (ResPFSN) are introduced in this study. The performance of these four network models is meticulously compared and evaluated. The findings reveal that the most effective feature fusion monitoring model is the ResPFSN-type2, achieving an impressive accuracy of 99.4 % and displaying consistent performance across varying input image sizes and training data volumes. It underscores its potential for real-time process control applications. Furthermore, the interpretability of the model is scrutinized, with results indicating that the ResPFSN-type2 model adeptly identifies the contour texture and local features of the laser-induced melt pools.
期刊介绍:
Additive Manufacturing stands as a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to delivering high-quality research papers and reviews in the field of additive manufacturing, serving both academia and industry leaders. The journal's objective is to recognize the innovative essence of additive manufacturing and its diverse applications, providing a comprehensive overview of current developments and future prospects.
The transformative potential of additive manufacturing technologies in product design and manufacturing is poised to disrupt traditional approaches. In response to this paradigm shift, a distinctive and comprehensive publication outlet was essential. Additive Manufacturing fulfills this need, offering a platform for engineers, materials scientists, and practitioners across academia and various industries to document and share innovations in these evolving technologies.