流变学中的数据驱动技术:发展、挑战与展望

IF 7.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Deepak Mangal, Anushka Jha, Donya Dabiri, Safa Jamali
{"title":"流变学中的数据驱动技术:发展、挑战与展望","authors":"Deepak Mangal,&nbsp;Anushka Jha,&nbsp;Donya Dabiri,&nbsp;Safa Jamali","doi":"10.1016/j.cocis.2024.101873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid development and adoption of different data-driven techniques in rheology, this review aims to reflect on the advent and growth of these frameworks, survey the state-of-the-art methods relevant to rheological applications, and explore potential future directions. We classify different machine learning (ML) methodologies into data-centric and physics-informed frameworks. Data-centric methods leverage conventional ML techniques to uncover relationships within specific datasets, demonstrating success in rheological properties prediction, material characterization, properties optimization, and accelerated numerical simulations. Physics-informed machine learning combines physical laws and domain knowledge with data to produce generalizable and physically consistent predictions, proving effective in solving rheological differential equations, utilizing multi-fidelity datasets to enhance predictions, and constitutive modeling. The paper also discusses the limitations of these approaches and the ongoing efforts to address them. Looking ahead, this article emphasizes the need for explainable ML techniques to enhance transparency and trust, improved tools for uncertainty quantification. These advancements could significantly transform rheology and non-Newtonian fluid mechanics by enabling more robust, insightful, and efficient data-driven methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":293,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101873"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven techniques in rheology: Developments, challenges and perspective\",\"authors\":\"Deepak Mangal,&nbsp;Anushka Jha,&nbsp;Donya Dabiri,&nbsp;Safa Jamali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cocis.2024.101873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the rapid development and adoption of different data-driven techniques in rheology, this review aims to reflect on the advent and growth of these frameworks, survey the state-of-the-art methods relevant to rheological applications, and explore potential future directions. We classify different machine learning (ML) methodologies into data-centric and physics-informed frameworks. Data-centric methods leverage conventional ML techniques to uncover relationships within specific datasets, demonstrating success in rheological properties prediction, material characterization, properties optimization, and accelerated numerical simulations. Physics-informed machine learning combines physical laws and domain knowledge with data to produce generalizable and physically consistent predictions, proving effective in solving rheological differential equations, utilizing multi-fidelity datasets to enhance predictions, and constitutive modeling. The paper also discusses the limitations of these approaches and the ongoing efforts to address them. Looking ahead, this article emphasizes the need for explainable ML techniques to enhance transparency and trust, improved tools for uncertainty quantification. These advancements could significantly transform rheology and non-Newtonian fluid mechanics by enabling more robust, insightful, and efficient data-driven methodologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359029424000918\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359029424000918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着各种数据驱动技术在流变学领域的快速发展和采用,本综述旨在反思这些框架的出现和发展,调查与流变学应用相关的最新方法,并探索潜在的未来方向。我们将不同的机器学习(ML)方法分为以数据为中心的框架和物理信息框架。以数据为中心的方法利用传统的 ML 技术来揭示特定数据集中的关系,在流变特性预测、材料表征、特性优化和加速数值模拟方面取得了成功。物理信息机器学习将物理定律和领域知识与数据相结合,以产生可推广的、物理上一致的预测结果,在求解流变微分方程、利用多保真度数据集增强预测结果以及构造建模方面证明是有效的。本文还讨论了这些方法的局限性以及为解决这些问题正在进行的努力。展望未来,本文强调需要可解释的 ML 技术来提高透明度和信任度,并改进不确定性量化工具。这些进步可以使数据驱动的方法更稳健、更有洞察力、更高效,从而极大地改变流变学和非牛顿流体力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Data-driven techniques in rheology: Developments, challenges and perspective

Data-driven techniques in rheology: Developments, challenges and perspective
With the rapid development and adoption of different data-driven techniques in rheology, this review aims to reflect on the advent and growth of these frameworks, survey the state-of-the-art methods relevant to rheological applications, and explore potential future directions. We classify different machine learning (ML) methodologies into data-centric and physics-informed frameworks. Data-centric methods leverage conventional ML techniques to uncover relationships within specific datasets, demonstrating success in rheological properties prediction, material characterization, properties optimization, and accelerated numerical simulations. Physics-informed machine learning combines physical laws and domain knowledge with data to produce generalizable and physically consistent predictions, proving effective in solving rheological differential equations, utilizing multi-fidelity datasets to enhance predictions, and constitutive modeling. The paper also discusses the limitations of these approaches and the ongoing efforts to address them. Looking ahead, this article emphasizes the need for explainable ML techniques to enhance transparency and trust, improved tools for uncertainty quantification. These advancements could significantly transform rheology and non-Newtonian fluid mechanics by enabling more robust, insightful, and efficient data-driven methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
74
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science (COCIS) is an international journal that focuses on the molecular and nanoscopic aspects of colloidal systems and interfaces in various scientific and technological fields. These include materials science, biologically-relevant systems, energy and environmental technologies, and industrial applications. Unlike primary journals, COCIS primarily serves as a guide for researchers, helping them navigate through the vast landscape of recently published literature. It critically analyzes the state of the art, identifies bottlenecks and unsolved issues, and proposes future developments. Moreover, COCIS emphasizes certain areas and papers that are considered particularly interesting and significant by the Editors and Section Editors. Its goal is to provide valuable insights and updates to the research community in these specialized areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信