用于 WRF 模型输出偏差校正的深度学习方法,以增强太阳能和风能估算:东西马来西亚案例研究

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Abigail Birago Adomako , Ehsan Jolous Jamshidi , Yusri Yusup , Emad Elsebakhi , Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar , Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir Ishak , Hwee San Lim , Mardiana Idayu Ahmad
{"title":"用于 WRF 模型输出偏差校正的深度学习方法,以增强太阳能和风能估算:东西马来西亚案例研究","authors":"Abigail Birago Adomako ,&nbsp;Ehsan Jolous Jamshidi ,&nbsp;Yusri Yusup ,&nbsp;Emad Elsebakhi ,&nbsp;Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar ,&nbsp;Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir Ishak ,&nbsp;Hwee San Lim ,&nbsp;Mardiana Idayu Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of wind and solar energy potentials is crucial for successfully integrating renewable energy into power grids. Traditional numerical weather prediction models, such as the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, often suffer from biases that lead to inaccurate energy forecasts. This study employs advanced deep learning (DL) techniques to correct these biases in WRF model outputs, specifically to enhance wind and solar energy estimations in East and West Malaysia. Unlike previous studies, this research integrates a diverse array of DL models: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN), to address both temporal and spatial prediction challenges. The models were trained and tested using historical weather data and ground-based measurements to improve the accuracy of wind speed and solar radiation predictions. Evaluation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and mean absolute error (MAE), demonstrate the better performance of CNN and FNN models over the sole WRF approach. The findings reveal that CNN achieved the lowest RMSE in wind speed estimation (0.91 in CEMACS and 0.97 in Kuching compared to WRF RMSEs of 1.92 and 1.39). At the same time, FNN significantly improved solar radiation prediction (RMSE of 86.86 in Kuching and 99.23 in CEMACS compared to WRF RMSEs of 154.44 and 370.66). Given the low wind speeds, the corrected data from CNN was used to estimate wind energy at 536 kWh at Kuching and 0 kWh at CEMACS. FNN-corrected data was also used to estimate solar energy at 19 kWh and 18 kWh at Kuching and CEMACS, respectively. This research not only shows the effectiveness of DL in mitigating biases in numerical weather prediction models but also contributes a novel methodology for reliable renewable energy assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102898"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning approaches for bias correction in WRF model outputs for enhanced solar and wind energy estimation: A case study in East and West Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Birago Adomako ,&nbsp;Ehsan Jolous Jamshidi ,&nbsp;Yusri Yusup ,&nbsp;Emad Elsebakhi ,&nbsp;Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar ,&nbsp;Muhammad Izzuddin Syakir Ishak ,&nbsp;Hwee San Lim ,&nbsp;Mardiana Idayu Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate estimation of wind and solar energy potentials is crucial for successfully integrating renewable energy into power grids. Traditional numerical weather prediction models, such as the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, often suffer from biases that lead to inaccurate energy forecasts. This study employs advanced deep learning (DL) techniques to correct these biases in WRF model outputs, specifically to enhance wind and solar energy estimations in East and West Malaysia. Unlike previous studies, this research integrates a diverse array of DL models: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN), to address both temporal and spatial prediction challenges. The models were trained and tested using historical weather data and ground-based measurements to improve the accuracy of wind speed and solar radiation predictions. Evaluation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and mean absolute error (MAE), demonstrate the better performance of CNN and FNN models over the sole WRF approach. The findings reveal that CNN achieved the lowest RMSE in wind speed estimation (0.91 in CEMACS and 0.97 in Kuching compared to WRF RMSEs of 1.92 and 1.39). At the same time, FNN significantly improved solar radiation prediction (RMSE of 86.86 in Kuching and 99.23 in CEMACS compared to WRF RMSEs of 154.44 and 370.66). Given the low wind speeds, the corrected data from CNN was used to estimate wind energy at 536 kWh at Kuching and 0 kWh at CEMACS. FNN-corrected data was also used to estimate solar energy at 19 kWh and 18 kWh at Kuching and CEMACS, respectively. This research not only shows the effectiveness of DL in mitigating biases in numerical weather prediction models but also contributes a novel methodology for reliable renewable energy assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004400\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954124004400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估计风能和太阳能的潜力对于成功将可再生能源并入电网至关重要。传统的数值天气预报模型,如天气研究与预测(WRF)模型,往往存在偏差,导致能源预测不准确。本研究采用了先进的深度学习(DL)技术来纠正 WRF 模型输出中的这些偏差,特别是为了增强马来西亚东部和西部的风能和太阳能估算。与以往的研究不同,本研究整合了多种深度学习模型:循环神经网络 (RNN)、长短期记忆 (LSTM)、卷积神经网络 (CNN) 和前馈神经网络 (FNN),以解决时间和空间预测难题。利用历史气象数据和地面测量数据对这些模型进行了训练和测试,以提高风速和太阳辐射预测的准确性。评估指标(均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均偏差误差 (MBE) 和平均绝对误差 (MAE))表明,与单一的 WRF 方法相比,CNN 和 FNN 模型具有更好的性能。研究结果表明,CNN 在风速估计方面的 RMSE 最低(CEMACS 为 0.91,古晋为 0.97,而 WRF 的 RMSE 分别为 1.92 和 1.39)。同时,FNN 显著改善了太阳辐射预测(古晋和 CEMACS 的 RMSE 分别为 86.86 和 99.23,而 WRF 的 RMSE 分别为 154.44 和 370.66)。鉴于风速较低,使用 CNN 修正数据估算的风能在古晋为 536 千瓦时,在 CEMACS 为 0 千瓦时。经 FNN 修正的数据还用于估算古晋和 CEMACS 的太阳能,分别为 19 千瓦时和 18 千瓦时。这项研究不仅显示了 DL 在减少数值天气预报模型偏差方面的有效性,还为可靠的可再生能源评估提供了一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning approaches for bias correction in WRF model outputs for enhanced solar and wind energy estimation: A case study in East and West Malaysia
Accurate estimation of wind and solar energy potentials is crucial for successfully integrating renewable energy into power grids. Traditional numerical weather prediction models, such as the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, often suffer from biases that lead to inaccurate energy forecasts. This study employs advanced deep learning (DL) techniques to correct these biases in WRF model outputs, specifically to enhance wind and solar energy estimations in East and West Malaysia. Unlike previous studies, this research integrates a diverse array of DL models: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN), to address both temporal and spatial prediction challenges. The models were trained and tested using historical weather data and ground-based measurements to improve the accuracy of wind speed and solar radiation predictions. Evaluation metrics, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and mean absolute error (MAE), demonstrate the better performance of CNN and FNN models over the sole WRF approach. The findings reveal that CNN achieved the lowest RMSE in wind speed estimation (0.91 in CEMACS and 0.97 in Kuching compared to WRF RMSEs of 1.92 and 1.39). At the same time, FNN significantly improved solar radiation prediction (RMSE of 86.86 in Kuching and 99.23 in CEMACS compared to WRF RMSEs of 154.44 and 370.66). Given the low wind speeds, the corrected data from CNN was used to estimate wind energy at 536 kWh at Kuching and 0 kWh at CEMACS. FNN-corrected data was also used to estimate solar energy at 19 kWh and 18 kWh at Kuching and CEMACS, respectively. This research not only shows the effectiveness of DL in mitigating biases in numerical weather prediction models but also contributes a novel methodology for reliable renewable energy assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信