基于风险的肉类检查方法:欧洲官方兽医如何看待他们的工作和培训

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Eduarda Gomes-Neves , Margarida Fonseca Cardoso
{"title":"基于风险的肉类检查方法:欧洲官方兽医如何看待他们的工作和培训","authors":"Eduarda Gomes-Neves ,&nbsp;Margarida Fonseca Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.</div><div>OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.</div><div>The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.</div><div>OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 111050"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A risk-based approach to meat inspection: How European official veterinarians perceive their work and training\",\"authors\":\"Eduarda Gomes-Neves ,&nbsp;Margarida Fonseca Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.</div><div>OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.</div><div>The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.</div><div>OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Control\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524007679\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524007679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

官方兽医(OVs)负责执行官方控制,以确保动物源性食品的安全。在 29 个欧洲国家工作的官方兽医填写了一份匿名问卷,内容包括人口统计学数据、资格数据、工作经验、日常工作、就业状况和培训。多层次逻辑模型检验了社会人口特征、资格、日常工作和就业状况与不自信或不满意感之间的关系。对肉眼检查不自信和对支持基于风险的肉类检查的资源不自信的监督员比例分别约为 20% 和 30%。与传统肉类检验相比,拥有国家专业和年龄在 36-45 岁之间与对肉类目视检验结果没有信心有关,而拥有博士学位和全职从事监督员工作与对基于风险的肉类检验没有信心有关。对就业或培训不满意的监督员比例低于 20%。与拥有兽医硕士学位的人员相比,拥有理学硕士学位的人员更有可能对自己的工作不满意。欧洲各地的官方兽医似乎对其就业和培训的看法一致,但对其日常工作(如目测检查和基于风险的肉类检查)的困难的看法与高学历和全职工作呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A risk-based approach to meat inspection: How European official veterinarians perceive their work and training
Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.
OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.
The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.
OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Control
Food Control 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control. Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods: • Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems • Mycotoxins • Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives • Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards • Quality assurance • Good manufacturing practices • Food process systems design and control • Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods • Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology • Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization • Consumer issues • Education, training and research needs. The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信