{"title":"基于风险的肉类检查方法:欧洲官方兽医如何看待他们的工作和培训","authors":"Eduarda Gomes-Neves , Margarida Fonseca Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.</div><div>OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.</div><div>The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.</div><div>OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 111050"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A risk-based approach to meat inspection: How European official veterinarians perceive their work and training\",\"authors\":\"Eduarda Gomes-Neves , Margarida Fonseca Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.111050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.</div><div>OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.</div><div>The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.</div><div>OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Control\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524007679\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524007679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A risk-based approach to meat inspection: How European official veterinarians perceive their work and training
Official veterinarians (OVs) are responsible for carrying out official controls to ensure the safety of food of animal origin. This study aims to evaluate the perceptions of OVs regarding their employment and training, and their confidence in work development procedures such as visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection.
OVs working in 29 European countries completed an anonymous questionnaire including demographic data, qualification data, work experience, daily work, employment situation, and training. Multilevel logistic models examined the relationships of socio-demographic characteristics, qualifications, daily work and employment situation with the perception of not confident or unsatisfied.
The proportion of OVs not confident in visual inspection and not confident in resources to support risk-based meat inspection, was around 20% and 30% respectively. Having a national specialisation and being in the 36–45 age group were associated with not being confident with visual inspection results compared to traditional meat inspection, while having a PhD and spending full time on OV tasks was associated with not being confident with risk-based meat inspection. The proportion of OVs dissatisfied with employment or with training was less than 20%. Those holding an MSc were more likely to be dissatisfied with their employment than those with a DVM. Dissatisfaction regarding training was not associated with any of the variables.
OVs across Europe seem unanimous in their perceptions of their employment and training, but the perceptions about the difficulties in their day-to-day work (e.g. visual inspection and risk-based meat inspection) were associated positively with higher qualifications and working full-time.
期刊介绍:
Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control.
Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods:
• Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems
• Mycotoxins
• Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives
• Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards
• Quality assurance
• Good manufacturing practices
• Food process systems design and control
• Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods
• Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology
• Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization
• Consumer issues
• Education, training and research needs.
The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.