Zhao Peng, Duo Li, Na Wu, Xiao-Yuan Wang, Gai-Xia Sun, Hui-Bin Gao, Hai-Xia Li
{"title":"姜黄素治疗溃疡性结肠炎的安全性和有效性:随机对照试验的最新系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Zhao Peng, Duo Li, Na Wu, Xiao-Yuan Wang, Gai-Xia Sun, Hui-Bin Gao, Hai-Xia Li","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess the methodological quality of the published studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight randomized controlled trials involving 482 patients were included. Seven studies reported clinical remission, and three reported endoscopic remission. Compared to the placebo group, adjunctive curcumin therapy significantly improved clinical remission (RR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 4.34; <em>P</em> = 0.008; I²=80 %). Although endoscopic remission showed an increasing trend, it was not statistically significant (RR=4.17, 95 % CI: 0.63 to 27.71; <em>P</em> = 0.14; I²=80 %). Significant improvements were also observed in clinical improvement (RR=1.93, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 3.36; <em>P</em> = 0.02; I²=56 %) and endoscopic improvement (RR=1.76, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.77; <em>P</em> = 0.01; I²=62 %) in the curcumin group. No serious adverse events were reported. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive correlation between treatment efficacy and dosage, with no significant impact of administration method or follow-up duration on the pooled results or heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Curcumin as an adjunctive treatment shows promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in UC patients without significant adverse effects. However, due to the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":"21 1","pages":"Article 103083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Peng, Duo Li, Na Wu, Xiao-Yuan Wang, Gai-Xia Sun, Hui-Bin Gao, Hai-Xia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.explore.2024.103083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess the methodological quality of the published studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight randomized controlled trials involving 482 patients were included. Seven studies reported clinical remission, and three reported endoscopic remission. Compared to the placebo group, adjunctive curcumin therapy significantly improved clinical remission (RR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 4.34; <em>P</em> = 0.008; I²=80 %). Although endoscopic remission showed an increasing trend, it was not statistically significant (RR=4.17, 95 % CI: 0.63 to 27.71; <em>P</em> = 0.14; I²=80 %). Significant improvements were also observed in clinical improvement (RR=1.93, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 3.36; <em>P</em> = 0.02; I²=56 %) and endoscopic improvement (RR=1.76, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.77; <em>P</em> = 0.01; I²=62 %) in the curcumin group. No serious adverse events were reported. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive correlation between treatment efficacy and dosage, with no significant impact of administration method or follow-up duration on the pooled results or heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Curcumin as an adjunctive treatment shows promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in UC patients without significant adverse effects. However, due to the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 103083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830724001903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Objective
This study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of curcumin as an adjunctive treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and to assess the methodological quality of the published studies.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials published up to August 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I² statistic.
Results
Eight randomized controlled trials involving 482 patients were included. Seven studies reported clinical remission, and three reported endoscopic remission. Compared to the placebo group, adjunctive curcumin therapy significantly improved clinical remission (RR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 4.34; P = 0.008; I²=80 %). Although endoscopic remission showed an increasing trend, it was not statistically significant (RR=4.17, 95 % CI: 0.63 to 27.71; P = 0.14; I²=80 %). Significant improvements were also observed in clinical improvement (RR=1.93, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 3.36; P = 0.02; I²=56 %) and endoscopic improvement (RR=1.76, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.77; P = 0.01; I²=62 %) in the curcumin group. No serious adverse events were reported. Subgroup analysis indicated a positive correlation between treatment efficacy and dosage, with no significant impact of administration method or follow-up duration on the pooled results or heterogeneity.
Conclusion
Curcumin as an adjunctive treatment shows promise in improving clinical and endoscopic outcomes in UC patients without significant adverse effects. However, due to the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.