Yanxuan Chen, Xiaobo Huang, Rong Tang, Rui Zhang, Cong Li, Tongli Wang, Jianrong Su, Shuaifeng Li
{"title":"土壤微生物功能群、非生物因素和生物因素对植物功能群的影响:中国西南热带雨林的启示","authors":"Yanxuan Chen, Xiaobo Huang, Rong Tang, Rui Zhang, Cong Li, Tongli Wang, Jianrong Su, Shuaifeng Li","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07092-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Studying the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional groups, abiotic and biotic factors are important for understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence and ecological processes among biological communities, especially in species-rich tropical rainforests.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study utilized the Competitor, Stress-tolerator, and Ruderal (CSR) theory for plant classification, and FAPROTAX and FUNGuild for soil bacterial and fungal functional guild analysis, and combined with abiotic and biotic factors. We use correlation analysis, multivariate regression analysis, random forest model, redundancy analysis and variance decomposition to analyze the data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>(1) A total of 316 woody plant species were classified into four functional groups. The intermediate (Int, 53.48%) and competitor (C, 29.75%) functional groups comprised the majority of plant species, while the ruderal (R) functional group was least represented (1.27%). Dominant soil fungal functional groups included <i>undefined saprotrophs</i>, <i>ectomycorrhizal</i>, and <i>soil saprotrophs</i>, while key bacterial groups included <i>chemoheterotrophs</i>, <i>nitrifiers</i>, and <i>nitrogen fixers</i>. (2) <i>Soil saprotrophs</i> were positively correlated with the stress-tolerator (S) functional group but negatively with the Int functional group. The C functional group was positively associated with <i>arbuscular mycorrhizal</i> fungi. (3) Soil bacterial functional groups were the key driving factors affecting the relative abundance of plant functional groups, while abiotic and biotic factors were the important influencing factors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study sheds light on the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional diversity, biotic and abiotic factors, underlying processes for understanding tropical rainforest community dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of soil microbial functional groups, abiotic and biotic factors on plant functional groups: insights from a tropical rainforest in Southwest China\",\"authors\":\"Yanxuan Chen, Xiaobo Huang, Rong Tang, Rui Zhang, Cong Li, Tongli Wang, Jianrong Su, Shuaifeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-024-07092-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Studying the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional groups, abiotic and biotic factors are important for understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence and ecological processes among biological communities, especially in species-rich tropical rainforests.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This study utilized the Competitor, Stress-tolerator, and Ruderal (CSR) theory for plant classification, and FAPROTAX and FUNGuild for soil bacterial and fungal functional guild analysis, and combined with abiotic and biotic factors. We use correlation analysis, multivariate regression analysis, random forest model, redundancy analysis and variance decomposition to analyze the data.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>(1) A total of 316 woody plant species were classified into four functional groups. The intermediate (Int, 53.48%) and competitor (C, 29.75%) functional groups comprised the majority of plant species, while the ruderal (R) functional group was least represented (1.27%). Dominant soil fungal functional groups included <i>undefined saprotrophs</i>, <i>ectomycorrhizal</i>, and <i>soil saprotrophs</i>, while key bacterial groups included <i>chemoheterotrophs</i>, <i>nitrifiers</i>, and <i>nitrogen fixers</i>. (2) <i>Soil saprotrophs</i> were positively correlated with the stress-tolerator (S) functional group but negatively with the Int functional group. The C functional group was positively associated with <i>arbuscular mycorrhizal</i> fungi. (3) Soil bacterial functional groups were the key driving factors affecting the relative abundance of plant functional groups, while abiotic and biotic factors were the important influencing factors.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study sheds light on the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional diversity, biotic and abiotic factors, underlying processes for understanding tropical rainforest community dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07092-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07092-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的研究植物功能群与土壤微生物功能群、非生物因素和生物因素之间的关系,对于理解物种共存机制和生物群落生态过程,尤其是物种丰富的热带雨林中的物种共存机制和生态过程具有重要意义。方法本研究利用竞争者、压力-调节者和先驱者(Competitor, Stress-tolerator, and Ruderal, CSR)理论进行植物分类,利用FAPROTAX和FUNGuild进行土壤细菌和真菌功能群分析,并与非生物因素和生物因素相结合。采用相关性分析、多元回归分析、随机森林模型、冗余分析和方差分解等方法对数据进行分析。大多数植物物种属于中间功能群(Int,53.48%)和竞争者功能群(C,29.75%),而草地功能群(R)所占比例最小(1.27%)。主要的土壤真菌功能群包括未定义的嗜渍真菌、外生菌根和土壤嗜渍真菌,而主要的细菌群包括化合嗜血菌、硝化菌和固氮菌。(2)土壤嗜根菌与胁迫-调节剂(S)功能群呈正相关,但与 Int 功能群呈负相关。C 功能群与丛枝菌根真菌呈正相关。(3) 土壤细菌功能群是影响植物功能群相对丰度的关键驱动因素,而非生物因素和生物因素是重要的影响因素。
The effect of soil microbial functional groups, abiotic and biotic factors on plant functional groups: insights from a tropical rainforest in Southwest China
Background and aims
Studying the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional groups, abiotic and biotic factors are important for understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence and ecological processes among biological communities, especially in species-rich tropical rainforests.
Methods
This study utilized the Competitor, Stress-tolerator, and Ruderal (CSR) theory for plant classification, and FAPROTAX and FUNGuild for soil bacterial and fungal functional guild analysis, and combined with abiotic and biotic factors. We use correlation analysis, multivariate regression analysis, random forest model, redundancy analysis and variance decomposition to analyze the data.
Results
(1) A total of 316 woody plant species were classified into four functional groups. The intermediate (Int, 53.48%) and competitor (C, 29.75%) functional groups comprised the majority of plant species, while the ruderal (R) functional group was least represented (1.27%). Dominant soil fungal functional groups included undefined saprotrophs, ectomycorrhizal, and soil saprotrophs, while key bacterial groups included chemoheterotrophs, nitrifiers, and nitrogen fixers. (2) Soil saprotrophs were positively correlated with the stress-tolerator (S) functional group but negatively with the Int functional group. The C functional group was positively associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. (3) Soil bacterial functional groups were the key driving factors affecting the relative abundance of plant functional groups, while abiotic and biotic factors were the important influencing factors.
Conclusion
This study sheds light on the relationship between plant functional groups and soil microbial functional diversity, biotic and abiotic factors, underlying processes for understanding tropical rainforest community dynamics.
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.