比较[18F]FAPI-42和[18F]FDG PET/CT在系统性血管炎评估中的应用

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Kaixiang Zhong, Haiming Chen, Peng Hou, Linling Cheng, Wenliang Guo, Youcai Li, Jie Lv, Miao Ke, Xiaofeng Wu, Yongxia Lei, Chunli Liu, Cheng Hong, Xinlu Wang
{"title":"比较[18F]FAPI-42和[18F]FDG PET/CT在系统性血管炎评估中的应用","authors":"Kaixiang Zhong, Haiming Chen, Peng Hou, Linling Cheng, Wenliang Guo, Youcai Li, Jie Lv, Miao Ke, Xiaofeng Wu, Yongxia Lei, Chunli Liu, Cheng Hong, Xinlu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06986-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The role of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted imaging in systemic vasculitis is currently unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of fluorine-18-labeled FAP inhibitor 42 ([<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-42) in patients with systemic vasculitis and to compare with [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients with systemic vasculitis who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI) imaging from September 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Positive lesions are defined as vascular/extravascular lesions with increased tracer uptake above surrounding background, which cannot be attributed to the physiologic biodistribution of the radiotracer. The vascular/extravascular lesion detection rate and semiquantitative values (SUVmax, TBR<sub>blood</sub> and TBR<sub>liver</sub>) of [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG were compared, and the correlation between the extent and range of tracer uptake and levels of inflammatory markers was investigated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Thirty patients (13 males and 17 females; mean age, 52.5 ± 17.2 years) with systemic vasculitis were included (17 large vessel vasculitis, 10 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 2 Behcet’s disease and 1 polyarteritis nodosa). [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT had positive findings in 93.3% (28/30) of patients, while [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT had positive findings in all patients (100%, <i>P</i> = 0.500). Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT detected more lesions (161/168 vs. 145/168, <i>P</i> = 0.005), and more extensive vascular involvement in 60% (18/30) of patients. Although SUVmax did not differ significantly between [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (median, 5.94 vs. 5.46, <i>P</i> = 0.517), [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI had higher TBR<sub>liver</sub> (median, 9.59 vs. 3.15, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and TBR<sub>blood</sub> (median, 5.45 vs. 4.20, <i>P</i> = 0.006). The total number of positive lesions in FAPI PET/CT show a moderate correlation with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> =0.478, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and C-reactive protein (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> =0.486, <i>P</i> = 0.006). After treatment, follow-up FAPI PET/CT of 6 patients showed decreased SUVmax, TBR and number of detected lesions, paralleling the clinical remission.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>[<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of systemic vasculitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of [18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of systemic vasculitis\",\"authors\":\"Kaixiang Zhong, Haiming Chen, Peng Hou, Linling Cheng, Wenliang Guo, Youcai Li, Jie Lv, Miao Ke, Xiaofeng Wu, Yongxia Lei, Chunli Liu, Cheng Hong, Xinlu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00259-024-06986-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The role of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted imaging in systemic vasculitis is currently unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of fluorine-18-labeled FAP inhibitor 42 ([<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-42) in patients with systemic vasculitis and to compare with [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Patients with systemic vasculitis who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI) imaging from September 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Positive lesions are defined as vascular/extravascular lesions with increased tracer uptake above surrounding background, which cannot be attributed to the physiologic biodistribution of the radiotracer. The vascular/extravascular lesion detection rate and semiquantitative values (SUVmax, TBR<sub>blood</sub> and TBR<sub>liver</sub>) of [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG were compared, and the correlation between the extent and range of tracer uptake and levels of inflammatory markers was investigated.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Thirty patients (13 males and 17 females; mean age, 52.5 ± 17.2 years) with systemic vasculitis were included (17 large vessel vasculitis, 10 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 2 Behcet’s disease and 1 polyarteritis nodosa). [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT had positive findings in 93.3% (28/30) of patients, while [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT had positive findings in all patients (100%, <i>P</i> = 0.500). Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT detected more lesions (161/168 vs. 145/168, <i>P</i> = 0.005), and more extensive vascular involvement in 60% (18/30) of patients. Although SUVmax did not differ significantly between [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG (median, 5.94 vs. 5.46, <i>P</i> = 0.517), [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI had higher TBR<sub>liver</sub> (median, 9.59 vs. 3.15, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and TBR<sub>blood</sub> (median, 5.45 vs. 4.20, <i>P</i> = 0.006). The total number of positive lesions in FAPI PET/CT show a moderate correlation with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> =0.478, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and C-reactive protein (<i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> =0.486, <i>P</i> = 0.006). After treatment, follow-up FAPI PET/CT of 6 patients showed decreased SUVmax, TBR and number of detected lesions, paralleling the clinical remission.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>[<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of systemic vasculitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06986-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06986-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的目前尚不清楚成纤维细胞活化蛋白(FAP)靶向成像在系统性血管炎中的作用。我们旨在评估氟-18标记的FAP抑制剂42([18F]FAPI-42)在系统性血管炎患者中的临床价值,并与[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)成像进行比较。方法回顾性分析2020年9月至2022年3月期间接受双示踪剂PET/CT([18F]FDG和[18F]FAPI)成像的系统性血管炎患者。阳性病变定义为示踪剂摄取量高于周围背景的血管/血管外病变,这不能归因于放射性示踪剂的生理性生物分布。比较了[18F]FAPI和[18F]FDG的血管/血管外病变检出率和半定量值(SUVmax、TBRblood和TBRliver),并研究了示踪剂摄取的程度和范围与炎症标志物水平之间的相关性。结果纳入了 30 位全身性血管炎患者(13 位男性,17 位女性;平均年龄为 52.5 ± 17.2 岁)(17 位大血管炎患者,10 位抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎患者,2 位白塞氏病患者,1 位结节性多动脉炎患者)。93.3% 的患者(28/30)的[18F]FDG PET/CT 检查结果呈阳性,而所有患者(100%,P = 0.500)的[18F]FAPI PET/CT 检查结果均呈阳性。与[18F]FDG PET/CT 相比,[18F]FAPI PET/CT 发现的病灶更多(161/168 对 145/168,P = 0.005),60%(18/30)的患者血管受累范围更广。虽然[18F]FAPI和[18F]FDG的SUVmax没有显著差异(中位数,5.94 vs. 5.46,P = 0.517),但[18F]FAPI的TBRliver(中位数,9.59 vs. 3.15,P <0.001)和TBRblood(中位数,5.45 vs. 4.20,P = 0.006)更高。FAPI PET/CT 阳性病灶总数与红细胞沉降率(rs =0.478,P =0.008)和 C 反应蛋白(rs =0.486,P =0.006)呈中度相关。结论[18F]FAPI PET/CT 成像是诊断和治疗监测系统性血管炎的一种很有前途的成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of [18F]FAPI-42 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of systemic vasculitis

Purpose

The role of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted imaging in systemic vasculitis is currently unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of fluorine-18-labeled FAP inhibitor 42 ([18F]FAPI-42) in patients with systemic vasculitis and to compare with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging.

Methods

Patients with systemic vasculitis who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT([18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI) imaging from September 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Positive lesions are defined as vascular/extravascular lesions with increased tracer uptake above surrounding background, which cannot be attributed to the physiologic biodistribution of the radiotracer. The vascular/extravascular lesion detection rate and semiquantitative values (SUVmax, TBRblood and TBRliver) of [18F]FAPI and [18F]FDG were compared, and the correlation between the extent and range of tracer uptake and levels of inflammatory markers was investigated.

Results

Thirty patients (13 males and 17 females; mean age, 52.5 ± 17.2 years) with systemic vasculitis were included (17 large vessel vasculitis, 10 anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 2 Behcet’s disease and 1 polyarteritis nodosa). [18F]FDG PET/CT had positive findings in 93.3% (28/30) of patients, while [18F]FAPI PET/CT had positive findings in all patients (100%, P = 0.500). Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, [18F]FAPI PET/CT detected more lesions (161/168 vs. 145/168, P = 0.005), and more extensive vascular involvement in 60% (18/30) of patients. Although SUVmax did not differ significantly between [18F]FAPI and [18F]FDG (median, 5.94 vs. 5.46, P = 0.517), [18F]FAPI had higher TBRliver (median, 9.59 vs. 3.15, P < 0.001) and TBRblood (median, 5.45 vs. 4.20, P = 0.006). The total number of positive lesions in FAPI PET/CT show a moderate correlation with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (rs =0.478, P = 0.008) and C-reactive protein (rs =0.486, P = 0.006). After treatment, follow-up FAPI PET/CT of 6 patients showed decreased SUVmax, TBR and number of detected lesions, paralleling the clinical remission.

Conclusion

[18F]FAPI PET/CT imaging is a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of systemic vasculitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信