来自 AO327 巡天观测的 23 颗脉冲星的闪烁带宽测量结果

Sofia Sheikh, Grayce C. Brown, Jackson MacTaggart, Thomas Nguyen, William D. Fletcher, Brenda L. Jones, Emma Koller, Veronica Petrus, Katie F. Pighini, Gray Rosario, Vincent A. Smedile, Adam T. Stone, Shawn You, Maura A. McLaughlin, Jacob E. Turner, Julia S. Deneva, Michael T. Lam and Brent J. Shapiro-Albert
{"title":"来自 AO327 巡天观测的 23 颗脉冲星的闪烁带宽测量结果","authors":"Sofia Sheikh, Grayce C. Brown, Jackson MacTaggart, Thomas Nguyen, William D. Fletcher, Brenda L. Jones, Emma Koller, Veronica Petrus, Katie F. Pighini, Gray Rosario, Vincent A. Smedile, Adam T. Stone, Shawn You, Maura A. McLaughlin, Jacob E. Turner, Julia S. Deneva, Michael T. Lam and Brent J. Shapiro-Albert","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad8659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A pulsar’s scintillation bandwidth is inversely proportional to the scattering delay, making accurate measurements of scintillation bandwidth critical to characterize unmitigated delays in efforts to measure low-frequency gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays. In this pilot work, we searched for a subset of known pulsars within ∼97% of the data taken with the Puerto Rico Ultimate Pulsar Processing Instrument for the AO327 survey with the Arecibo telescope, attempting to measure the scintillation bandwidths in the data set by fitting to the 2D autocorrelation function of their dynamic spectra. We successfully measured 38 bandwidths from 23 pulsars (six without prior literature values), finding that: almost all of the measurements are larger than the predictions from NE2001 and YMW16 (two popular galactic models); NE2001 is more consistent with our measurements than YMW16; Gaussian fits to the bandwidth are more consistent with both electron density models than Lorentzian ones; and for the 17 pulsars with prior literature values, the measurements between various sources often vary by a few factors. The success of Gaussian fits may be due to the use of Gaussian fits to train models in previous work. The variance of literature values over time could relate to the scaling factor used to compare measurements, but also seems consistent with time-varying interstellar medium parameters. This work can be extended to the rest of AO327 to further investigate these trends, highlighting the continuing importance of large archival data sets for projects beyond their initial conception.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scintillation Bandwidth Measurements from 23 Pulsars from the AO327 Survey\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Sheikh, Grayce C. Brown, Jackson MacTaggart, Thomas Nguyen, William D. Fletcher, Brenda L. Jones, Emma Koller, Veronica Petrus, Katie F. Pighini, Gray Rosario, Vincent A. Smedile, Adam T. Stone, Shawn You, Maura A. McLaughlin, Jacob E. Turner, Julia S. Deneva, Michael T. Lam and Brent J. Shapiro-Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.3847/1538-4357/ad8659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A pulsar’s scintillation bandwidth is inversely proportional to the scattering delay, making accurate measurements of scintillation bandwidth critical to characterize unmitigated delays in efforts to measure low-frequency gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays. In this pilot work, we searched for a subset of known pulsars within ∼97% of the data taken with the Puerto Rico Ultimate Pulsar Processing Instrument for the AO327 survey with the Arecibo telescope, attempting to measure the scintillation bandwidths in the data set by fitting to the 2D autocorrelation function of their dynamic spectra. We successfully measured 38 bandwidths from 23 pulsars (six without prior literature values), finding that: almost all of the measurements are larger than the predictions from NE2001 and YMW16 (two popular galactic models); NE2001 is more consistent with our measurements than YMW16; Gaussian fits to the bandwidth are more consistent with both electron density models than Lorentzian ones; and for the 17 pulsars with prior literature values, the measurements between various sources often vary by a few factors. The success of Gaussian fits may be due to the use of Gaussian fits to train models in previous work. The variance of literature values over time could relate to the scaling factor used to compare measurements, but also seems consistent with time-varying interstellar medium parameters. This work can be extended to the rest of AO327 to further investigate these trends, highlighting the continuing importance of large archival data sets for projects beyond their initial conception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Astrophysical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脉冲星的闪烁带宽与散射延迟成反比,因此在利用脉冲星定时阵列测量低频引力波时,闪烁带宽的精确测量对于确定未减弱延迟的特征至关重要。在这项试验性工作中,我们在利用波多黎各终极脉冲星处理仪器为阿雷西博望远镜进行的 AO327 勘测所采集的数据的 97% ∼范围内搜索了已知脉冲星子集,试图通过拟合其动态光谱的二维自相关函数来测量数据集中的闪烁带宽。我们成功测量了 23 颗脉冲星的 38 个带宽(其中 6 颗没有先前的文献值),发现:几乎所有的测量值都大于 NE2001 和 YMW16(两个流行的星系模型)的预测值;NE2001 与我们的测量值比 YMW16 更一致;高斯拟合带宽与两个电子密度模型都比洛伦兹模型更一致;对于 17 颗有先前文献值的脉冲星,不同来源的测量值往往相差几个系数。高斯拟合的成功可能是由于在以前的工作中使用了高斯拟合来训练模型。文献值随时间变化的差异可能与用于比较测量值的比例因子有关,但似乎也与星际介质参数随时间变化的情况一致。这项工作可以扩展到 AO327 的其他部分,以进一步研究这些趋势,这突出了大型档案数据集对于超出其最初构想的项目的持续重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scintillation Bandwidth Measurements from 23 Pulsars from the AO327 Survey
A pulsar’s scintillation bandwidth is inversely proportional to the scattering delay, making accurate measurements of scintillation bandwidth critical to characterize unmitigated delays in efforts to measure low-frequency gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays. In this pilot work, we searched for a subset of known pulsars within ∼97% of the data taken with the Puerto Rico Ultimate Pulsar Processing Instrument for the AO327 survey with the Arecibo telescope, attempting to measure the scintillation bandwidths in the data set by fitting to the 2D autocorrelation function of their dynamic spectra. We successfully measured 38 bandwidths from 23 pulsars (six without prior literature values), finding that: almost all of the measurements are larger than the predictions from NE2001 and YMW16 (two popular galactic models); NE2001 is more consistent with our measurements than YMW16; Gaussian fits to the bandwidth are more consistent with both electron density models than Lorentzian ones; and for the 17 pulsars with prior literature values, the measurements between various sources often vary by a few factors. The success of Gaussian fits may be due to the use of Gaussian fits to train models in previous work. The variance of literature values over time could relate to the scaling factor used to compare measurements, but also seems consistent with time-varying interstellar medium parameters. This work can be extended to the rest of AO327 to further investigate these trends, highlighting the continuing importance of large archival data sets for projects beyond their initial conception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信