从口语和书面文本中推断词类和词义:有发育性语言障碍和无发育性语言障碍儿童的比较。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Karla K McGregor, Ron Pomper, Nichole Eden, Margo Appenzeller, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm, Elaina Polese, Deborah K Reed
{"title":"从口语和书面文本中推断词类和词义:有发育性语言障碍和无发育性语言障碍儿童的比较。","authors":"Karla K McGregor, Ron Pomper, Nichole Eden, Margo Appenzeller, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm, Elaina Polese, Deborah K Reed","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fourth graders with DLD (<i>n</i> = 28) and typical language development (TLD; <i>n</i> = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults (<i>n</i> = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns > adjectives > verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make \"worse\" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"4783-4798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Karla K McGregor, Ron Pomper, Nichole Eden, Margo Appenzeller, Timothy Arbisi-Kelm, Elaina Polese, Deborah K Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fourth graders with DLD (<i>n</i> = 28) and typical language development (TLD; <i>n</i> = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults (<i>n</i> = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns > adjectives > verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make \\\"worse\\\" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4783-4798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定发育性语言障碍(DLD)儿童从文本中推断词类和词义的能力,并记录词类(名词、动词、形容词)和模式(听力、阅读)的变化。我们还询问孩子们是否能整合整个段落的整体线索以及来自直接句子框架的局部线索来支持推断:方法:患有 DLD(n = 28)和典型语言发育不良(TLD;n = 41)的四年级学生阅读和聆听说明性文章,并猜测每篇文章中的名词、动词和形容词。成人(n = 20)也完成了这项任务,以建立正确回答的基线。我们使用潜在语义分析(LSA)来确定回答与文本的语义契合度,并确定对于 DLD 儿童来说,全局线索是否比局部线索更难:结果:DLD 组的准确率比 TLD 组低 24%。在这两个诊断组中,准确率因词类(名词 > 形容词 > 动词)而异,但不因模式(阅读 = 听力)而异。词类错误很少见,而语义匹配错误却很常见。相对于整个段落而言,LSA 的余弦值高于直接句子框架,这表明两组学生都利用了全局线索中更广泛的信息来支持推断。与 TLD 组相比,DLD 组往往会犯 "更严重 "的错误:重复句子框架中的单词或根本没有做出任何反应。DLD 组(而非 TLD 组)的准确性与词汇知识有关。如果将两组学生的成绩相加,言语短期/工作记忆和持续注意力的得分也能预测学生的成绩,但是,DLD 学生在这些方面的执行功能缺陷并不能完全解释 DLD 组和 TLD 组之间的成绩差异:无论是听力还是阅读,四年级的 DLD 学生从文章中推断词义的能力都比同龄人差。这一问题在一定程度上反映了执行功能和词汇语义知识的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inferring Word Class and Meaning From Spoken and Written Texts: A Comparison of Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the ability of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) to infer word class and meaning from text and to document variations by word class (noun, verb, adjective) and modality (listening, reading). We also asked whether the children could integrate global cues across the entire passage as well as local cues from the immediate sentence frame to support inferences.

Method: Fourth graders with DLD (n = 28) and typical language development (TLD; n = 41) read and listened to expository texts and guessed the noun, verb, and adjective removed from each. Adults (n = 20) completed the task to establish a baseline of correct responses. We used latent semantic analysis (LSA) to determine the semantic fit of the responses to the texts and to determine whether global cues were more difficult for children with DLD than local cues.

Results: The DLD group was 24% less accurate than the TLD group. In both diagnostic groups, accuracy varied by word class (nouns > adjectives > verbs) but not modality (reading = listening). Word class errors were rare, and errors of semantic fit were frequent. LSA cosines were higher for correct responses relative to the passage as a whole than the immediate sentence frame, suggesting that both groups mined the more extensive information in the global cues to support inferences. Compared to the TLD group, the DLD group tended to make "worse" errors: repeating words from the sentence frame or coming up with no response at all. Accuracy in the DLD group, but not the TLD group, was related to vocabulary knowledge. When the two groups were collapsed, scores on verbal short-term/working memory and sustained attention also predicted performance, but weaknesses in these aspects of executive function on the part of individuals with DLD did not fully explain the difference between the performance of the DLD and TLD groups.

Conclusions: Whether listening or reading, fourth graders with DLD are less able to infer word meaning from texts than their age-mates. The problem reflects, in part, deficits in executive function and lexical semantic knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信