Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith
{"title":"课程修订处方:设计思维原则的应用。","authors":"Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription for Curricular Revision: Application of Design Thinking Principles.\",\"authors\":\"Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prescription for Curricular Revision: Application of Design Thinking Principles.
Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.