课程修订处方:设计思维原则的应用。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith
{"title":"课程修订处方:设计思维原则的应用。","authors":"Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription for Curricular Revision: Application of Design Thinking Principles.\",\"authors\":\"Diana M Sobieraj, Kathryn Wheeler, Marissa Salvo, Marie Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专业课程质量的持续改进可能会带来一系列复杂的问题。如果有一个结构化的框架来解决复杂的问题,同时让教师和学生参与整个过程,那么药学院和药学系将从中受益。设计思维是一种促进创造性解决问题的框架,同时在迭代过程中使用了使模糊性和失败更容易接受的技术。在这篇评论中,我们介绍了如何运用设计思维过程来修订我们的专业教学课程,并最终制定出了一份经学院批准的新学习计划。我们解释了我们认为成功的关键驱动因素是什么,我们在设计思维的 5 个阶段中的每个阶段所面临的主要挑战,以及我们为克服这些挑战所做的工作。总的来说,设计思维使课程修订取得了成功,实现了透明度,建立了参与者之间的信任,并使沟通渠道民主化。随着修订后的课程进入实施阶段,我们预计在课程协调员和教师开发课程时会遇到一些阻力,这些课程将纳入课程与课程评估委员会(CCAC)对设计课程的愿景。下一步必须制定一个经常性的程序,以保持预期课程、设计课程和实施课程之间的一致性。这样可以通过更短、更小规模的设计思考过程,更早地识别和更快地解决课程方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prescription for Curricular Revision: Application of Design Thinking Principles.

Continuous quality improvement of the professional curriculum can present as a series of complex problems to solve. Schools and colleges of pharmacy would benefit from a structured framework to approach complex problem-solving while engaging faculty and students throughout the process. Design thinking is a framework that promotes creative problem-solving while using techniques that make ambiguity and failure more comfortable during the iterative process. In this commentary, we describe how we applied the design thinking process to revise our professional didactic curriculum, concluding with a new plan of study approved by the faculty. We explain what we believe that our key drivers of success were the main challenges that we faced in each of the 5 phases of design thinking and what we did to overcome these challenges. Overall, design thinking led to a successful curricular revision that allowed transparency, established trust among participants, and democratized the lines of communication. As we move into the revised curriculum's implementation, we anticipate some resistance as course coordinators and instructors develop courses incorporating the Curriculum and Curricular Assessment Committee vision of the designed curriculum. Developing a recurring process to maintain alignment between the intended, designed, and delivered curriculum is a necessary next step. This should allow earlier identification and quicker resolution of curricular concerns through a shorter and smaller scale design thinking process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信