从艰巨到可行:对复杂的公共卫生干预措施进行定性评估的工具。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Celeste Nicholas, Tess D Weathers, Lisa K Staten
{"title":"从艰巨到可行:对复杂的公共卫生干预措施进行定性评估的工具。","authors":"Celeste Nicholas, Tess D Weathers, Lisa K Staten","doi":"10.1177/15248399241298840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To address complex problems like health disparities, public health interventions have become increasingly ''complex''-engaging multisector partners and communities at multiple ecological levels. Complex interventions are intentionally flexible, making them challenging to evaluate with predetermined measures. While innovative evaluation methods tailored to complex interventions have been developed, there is a need for practical guidance to enhance capacity within public health. This article describes the qualitative FIND (Frame, Identify, Narrow, Do) evaluation process for a complex, community-engaged health equity intervention. Illustrative examples and take-away tools are provided. The FIND process is sensitive to complexity, involving ongoing data collection that helps guide implementation. The evaluator is embedded within the project team, facilitating frequent, direct interaction between the evaluator and those whose roles position them to hear or see happenings with the on-the-ground implementation in real time. The FIND process includes (a) developing a flexible framework for determining relevant processes and outcomes, (b) identifying important project events, (c) narrowing in on the most impactful events, and (d) making decisions informed by data. Using the FIND process, the project team learned about significant project events that would have been missed without a complexity-sensitive approach. Having the evaluator embedded within the project team, rather than as an independent entity, was crucial for understanding and utilizing on-the-ground developments in an evolving intervention. There is a need for more practical guidance to build capacity for evaluating complex public health interventions, including strategies for communicating with stakeholders about approaches that diverge from traditional scientific norms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241298840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Daunting to Doable: Tools for Qualitative Evaluation of a Complex Public Health Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Celeste Nicholas, Tess D Weathers, Lisa K Staten\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15248399241298840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To address complex problems like health disparities, public health interventions have become increasingly ''complex''-engaging multisector partners and communities at multiple ecological levels. Complex interventions are intentionally flexible, making them challenging to evaluate with predetermined measures. While innovative evaluation methods tailored to complex interventions have been developed, there is a need for practical guidance to enhance capacity within public health. This article describes the qualitative FIND (Frame, Identify, Narrow, Do) evaluation process for a complex, community-engaged health equity intervention. Illustrative examples and take-away tools are provided. The FIND process is sensitive to complexity, involving ongoing data collection that helps guide implementation. The evaluator is embedded within the project team, facilitating frequent, direct interaction between the evaluator and those whose roles position them to hear or see happenings with the on-the-ground implementation in real time. The FIND process includes (a) developing a flexible framework for determining relevant processes and outcomes, (b) identifying important project events, (c) narrowing in on the most impactful events, and (d) making decisions informed by data. Using the FIND process, the project team learned about significant project events that would have been missed without a complexity-sensitive approach. Having the evaluator embedded within the project team, rather than as an independent entity, was crucial for understanding and utilizing on-the-ground developments in an evolving intervention. There is a need for more practical guidance to build capacity for evaluating complex public health interventions, including strategies for communicating with stakeholders about approaches that diverge from traditional scientific norms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15248399241298840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241298840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241298840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决健康差距等复杂问题,公共卫生干预措施变得越来越 "复杂"--在多个生态层面让多部门合作伙伴和社区参与进来。复杂的干预措施具有有意的灵活性,这使得用预先确定的措施对其进行评估具有挑战性。虽然针对复杂干预措施的创新评估方法已经开发出来,但仍需要切实可行的指导来提高公共卫生领域的能力。本文介绍了针对复杂的、社区参与的健康公平干预措施的定性 FIND(框架、识别、缩小、执行)评估流程。文章提供了说明性实例和可借鉴的工具。FIND 流程对复杂性很敏感,涉及持续的数据收集,有助于指导实施工作。评估员被安排在项目团队中,这有利于评估员与那些有能力实时听到或看到现场实施情况的人员进行频繁、直接的互动。FIND 流程包括:(a) 制定一个灵活的框架,以确定相关的过程和结果;(b) 确定重要的 项目事件;(c) 缩小影响最大的事件的范围;(d) 根据数据做出决策。通过 FIND 流程,项目团队了解到一些重要的项目事件,如果不采用对复杂性有敏感认识 的方法,这些事件可能会被遗漏。让评估人员融入项目团队,而不是作为一个独立的实体,对于了解和利用不断发展的 干预措施的实地发展情况至关重要。有必要提供更多的实用指导,以建设评估复杂的公共卫生干预措施的能力,包括与利益相关者就偏离传统科学规范的方法进行沟通的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Daunting to Doable: Tools for Qualitative Evaluation of a Complex Public Health Intervention.

To address complex problems like health disparities, public health interventions have become increasingly ''complex''-engaging multisector partners and communities at multiple ecological levels. Complex interventions are intentionally flexible, making them challenging to evaluate with predetermined measures. While innovative evaluation methods tailored to complex interventions have been developed, there is a need for practical guidance to enhance capacity within public health. This article describes the qualitative FIND (Frame, Identify, Narrow, Do) evaluation process for a complex, community-engaged health equity intervention. Illustrative examples and take-away tools are provided. The FIND process is sensitive to complexity, involving ongoing data collection that helps guide implementation. The evaluator is embedded within the project team, facilitating frequent, direct interaction between the evaluator and those whose roles position them to hear or see happenings with the on-the-ground implementation in real time. The FIND process includes (a) developing a flexible framework for determining relevant processes and outcomes, (b) identifying important project events, (c) narrowing in on the most impactful events, and (d) making decisions informed by data. Using the FIND process, the project team learned about significant project events that would have been missed without a complexity-sensitive approach. Having the evaluator embedded within the project team, rather than as an independent entity, was crucial for understanding and utilizing on-the-ground developments in an evolving intervention. There is a need for more practical guidance to build capacity for evaluating complex public health interventions, including strategies for communicating with stakeholders about approaches that diverge from traditional scientific norms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信