信息共享,加强幼儿服务。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deborah G Badawi, Otonyemiete Georgewill, Felicia Jones
{"title":"信息共享,加强幼儿服务。","authors":"Deborah G Badawi, Otonyemiete Georgewill, Felicia Jones","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-04025-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate stakeholder willingness to share information among various social service providers, and to determine perceived barriers to accessing these services in our state.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The Maryland Family Network and the Maryland Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics partnered to collect information on family information sharing preferences and barriers to services. We received 22 Survey Monkey responses and had 41 focus group participants aged 25 to 44 years and all regions of the state were represented. Nearly half of participants were Black or African American and participants indicated a broad range of family income.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Most participants were a part of multiple assistance programs and were comfortable with all their information being shared, except their social security number. One third of participants noted they did not face barriers to accessing services. The other two thirds noted confusing applications, technology limitations and the need for self-advocacy as significant barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Families are very comfortable sharing information among early childhood service providers, and in fact favor having a single basic application that allows them to check off the agencies to which they would like to apply. Barriers to accessing services are logistical as well as cultural.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Sharing to Enhance Early Childhood Services.\",\"authors\":\"Deborah G Badawi, Otonyemiete Georgewill, Felicia Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-024-04025-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate stakeholder willingness to share information among various social service providers, and to determine perceived barriers to accessing these services in our state.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The Maryland Family Network and the Maryland Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics partnered to collect information on family information sharing preferences and barriers to services. We received 22 Survey Monkey responses and had 41 focus group participants aged 25 to 44 years and all regions of the state were represented. Nearly half of participants were Black or African American and participants indicated a broad range of family income.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Most participants were a part of multiple assistance programs and were comfortable with all their information being shared, except their social security number. One third of participants noted they did not face barriers to accessing services. The other two thirds noted confusing applications, technology limitations and the need for self-advocacy as significant barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Families are very comfortable sharing information among early childhood service providers, and in fact favor having a single basic application that allows them to check off the agencies to which they would like to apply. Barriers to accessing services are logistical as well as cultural.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-04025-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-04025-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是调查利益相关者在各种社会服务提供者之间共享信息的意愿,并确定他们在本州获得这些服务的障碍:马里兰家庭网络和美国儿科学会马里兰分会合作,收集有关家庭信息共享偏好和服务障碍的信息。我们收到了 22 份 "调查猴子"(Survey Monkey)回复,41 名焦点小组参与者的年龄在 25 至 44 岁之间,代表了该州的所有地区。近一半的参与者为黑人或非裔美国人,参与者的家庭收入范围广泛:大多数参与者参与了多个援助计划,并对除社会保险号以外的所有信息被共享感到满意。三分之一的参与者指出,他们在获取服务方面没有遇到障碍。另外三分之二的参与者指出,令人困惑的应用程序、技术限制和自我辩护的需要是主要障碍:家庭非常乐意在幼儿服务提供者之间共享信息,事实上,他们更喜欢使用单一的基本申 请表,这样他们就可以勾选他们想要申请的机构。获得服务的障碍既有后勤方面的,也有文化方面的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Sharing to Enhance Early Childhood Services.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate stakeholder willingness to share information among various social service providers, and to determine perceived barriers to accessing these services in our state.

Description: The Maryland Family Network and the Maryland Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics partnered to collect information on family information sharing preferences and barriers to services. We received 22 Survey Monkey responses and had 41 focus group participants aged 25 to 44 years and all regions of the state were represented. Nearly half of participants were Black or African American and participants indicated a broad range of family income.

Assessment: Most participants were a part of multiple assistance programs and were comfortable with all their information being shared, except their social security number. One third of participants noted they did not face barriers to accessing services. The other two thirds noted confusing applications, technology limitations and the need for self-advocacy as significant barriers.

Conclusion: Families are very comfortable sharing information among early childhood service providers, and in fact favor having a single basic application that allows them to check off the agencies to which they would like to apply. Barriers to accessing services are logistical as well as cultural.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信