Zoe McClure, Christopher J Greenwood, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mariel Messer, Jake Linardon
{"title":"应用机器学习技术预测暴食的发生和持续时间:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Zoe McClure, Christopher J Greenwood, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mariel Messer, Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1002/erv.3154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for enhancing prediction of clinical outcomes; however, its application to predicting binge eating has been scarcely explored. We applied ML techniques to predict binge eating onset (vs. continued absence) and persistence (vs. remission) over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were used from a larger prospective study of 1106 participants who were assessed on a range of putative risk, maintaining, and protective factors at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Nine ML models for classification were developed and compared against a generalised linear model (GLM) for predicting onset (n = 334) and persistence (n = 623) outcomes using 39 self-reported baseline variables as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models performed poorly at predicting onset (AUC = 0.49-0.61) and persistence (AUC = 0.50-0.59) outcomes, with ML models demonstrating comparable performance to the GLM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suspect that poor ML performance may have been a result of the limited set of self-reported baseline predictors used to generate prediction models. Improved predictive accuracy and optimisation of ML models in future research may require consideration of a larger, more disparate set of predictors that also incorporate various data types, such as neuroimaging, physiological, or smartphone sensor data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Onset and Persistence of Binge Eating: A Prospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe McClure, Christopher J Greenwood, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mariel Messer, Jake Linardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/erv.3154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for enhancing prediction of clinical outcomes; however, its application to predicting binge eating has been scarcely explored. We applied ML techniques to predict binge eating onset (vs. continued absence) and persistence (vs. remission) over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were used from a larger prospective study of 1106 participants who were assessed on a range of putative risk, maintaining, and protective factors at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Nine ML models for classification were developed and compared against a generalised linear model (GLM) for predicting onset (n = 334) and persistence (n = 623) outcomes using 39 self-reported baseline variables as predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All models performed poorly at predicting onset (AUC = 0.49-0.61) and persistence (AUC = 0.50-0.59) outcomes, with ML models demonstrating comparable performance to the GLM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We suspect that poor ML performance may have been a result of the limited set of self-reported baseline predictors used to generate prediction models. Improved predictive accuracy and optimisation of ML models in future research may require consideration of a larger, more disparate set of predictors that also incorporate various data types, such as neuroimaging, physiological, or smartphone sensor data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Eating Disorders Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Eating Disorders Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:机器学习(ML)技术有望提高临床结果的预测能力,但其在暴食预测中的应用却鲜有探索。我们应用 ML 技术来预测暴食的开始(与持续缺失)和随着时间推移的持续(与缓解):方法:我们使用了一项大型前瞻性研究中的数据,该研究涉及 1106 名参与者,他们在基线和 8 个月的随访中接受了一系列假定风险、维持和保护因素的评估。使用 39 个自我报告的基线变量作为预测因子,建立了九个 ML 分类模型,并与广义线性模型(GLM)进行比较,以预测发病(334 人)和持续发病(623 人)的结果:所有模型在预测发病(AUC = 0.49-0.61)和持续(AUC = 0.50-0.59)结果方面的表现都很差,ML 模型的表现与 GLM 相当:我们认为,ML 性能不佳的原因可能是用于生成预测模型的自我报告基线预测因子有限。在未来的研究中,要提高预测准确性并优化 ML 模型,可能需要考虑更大、更不同的预测因子集,并结合各种数据类型,如神经影像、生理或智能手机传感器数据。
Application of Machine Learning Techniques to the Prediction of Onset and Persistence of Binge Eating: A Prospective Study.
Objective: Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise for enhancing prediction of clinical outcomes; however, its application to predicting binge eating has been scarcely explored. We applied ML techniques to predict binge eating onset (vs. continued absence) and persistence (vs. remission) over time.
Method: Data were used from a larger prospective study of 1106 participants who were assessed on a range of putative risk, maintaining, and protective factors at baseline and 8 months follow-up. Nine ML models for classification were developed and compared against a generalised linear model (GLM) for predicting onset (n = 334) and persistence (n = 623) outcomes using 39 self-reported baseline variables as predictors.
Results: All models performed poorly at predicting onset (AUC = 0.49-0.61) and persistence (AUC = 0.50-0.59) outcomes, with ML models demonstrating comparable performance to the GLM.
Conclusion: We suspect that poor ML performance may have been a result of the limited set of self-reported baseline predictors used to generate prediction models. Improved predictive accuracy and optimisation of ML models in future research may require consideration of a larger, more disparate set of predictors that also incorporate various data types, such as neuroimaging, physiological, or smartphone sensor data.
期刊介绍:
European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.