评估适合模拟训练的人工尿石的消融率。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0561
Begoña Ballesta Martinez, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Theodoros Spinos, Bhaskar Somani, Domenico Veneziano, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis
{"title":"评估适合模拟训练的人工尿石的消融率。","authors":"Begoña Ballesta Martinez, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Theodoros Spinos, Bhaskar Somani, Domenico Veneziano, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Artificial urinary calculi are an essential tool for research and training in endourology. The goal of the study was to evaluate different types of artificial stones and how they behave to laser treatment, to finally determine which is the optimal one for training purposes. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The stones were produced with a mix of Bego Stone powder and water, at mixing rates of 15:03, 15:04, and 15:06. They were evaluated in an <i>in vitro</i> experimental setting using the Quanta Cyber 150 W high-power laser lithotripter. Dusting was set to 0.5 J × 20 Hz = 10 W and fragmentation was set to 0.8 J × 8 Hz = 6.4 W. Stone weights were assessed in dry and wet conditions. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The ablation rates in the dusting modality were similar for the three stone types tested. In the fragmentation mode, the mean ablation rate for 15:04 artificial stones was greater than those of 15:03 and 15:06 stones. Overall, the mean weight difference between the wet and dry stones was 0.03 g. Consequently, within the stone types tested, 15:04 artificial are probably the most convenient ones for training purposes because they get disintegrated similarly to 15:03 and 15:06 Bego Stones on a dusting setting, and ablation is faster on a fragmentation setting. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The 15:04 Bego Stones may be considered as the optimal option for use in simulation training models of the endourological education programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"73-78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Ablation Rates with Artificial Urinary Stones Appropriate for Simulation Training.\",\"authors\":\"Begoña Ballesta Martinez, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Theodoros Spinos, Bhaskar Somani, Domenico Veneziano, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Artificial urinary calculi are an essential tool for research and training in endourology. The goal of the study was to evaluate different types of artificial stones and how they behave to laser treatment, to finally determine which is the optimal one for training purposes. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The stones were produced with a mix of Bego Stone powder and water, at mixing rates of 15:03, 15:04, and 15:06. They were evaluated in an <i>in vitro</i> experimental setting using the Quanta Cyber 150 W high-power laser lithotripter. Dusting was set to 0.5 J × 20 Hz = 10 W and fragmentation was set to 0.8 J × 8 Hz = 6.4 W. Stone weights were assessed in dry and wet conditions. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The ablation rates in the dusting modality were similar for the three stone types tested. In the fragmentation mode, the mean ablation rate for 15:04 artificial stones was greater than those of 15:03 and 15:06 stones. Overall, the mean weight difference between the wet and dry stones was 0.03 g. Consequently, within the stone types tested, 15:04 artificial are probably the most convenient ones for training purposes because they get disintegrated similarly to 15:03 and 15:06 Bego Stones on a dusting setting, and ablation is faster on a fragmentation setting. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The 15:04 Bego Stones may be considered as the optimal option for use in simulation training models of the endourological education programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0561\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人工尿路结石是腔内放射学研究和培训的重要工具。本研究的目的是评估不同类型的人工结石及其在激光治疗中的表现,最终确定哪种结石最适合用于培训。材料和方法:人造结石由 Bego Stone 粉末和水混合制成,混合比例分别为 15:03、15:04 和 15:06。使用 Quanta Cyber 150 W 高功率激光碎石机在体外实验环境中对其进行评估。除尘设置为 0.5 J × 20 Hz = 10 W,碎石设置为 0.8 J × 8 Hz = 6.4 W。结果测试的三种石材在除尘模式下的烧蚀率相似。在破碎模式下,15:04 人工石材的平均烧蚀率高于 15:03 和 15:06 的石材。因此,在所测试的石材类型中,15:04 人造石可能是最适合用于训练的石材,因为在除尘设置下,它们与 15:03 和 15:06 Bego 石的崩解速度相似,而在破碎设置下,它们的消融速度更快。结论15:04 Bego 人造结石可被视为用于腔内造影教育项目模拟训练模型的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Ablation Rates with Artificial Urinary Stones Appropriate for Simulation Training.

Introduction: Artificial urinary calculi are an essential tool for research and training in endourology. The goal of the study was to evaluate different types of artificial stones and how they behave to laser treatment, to finally determine which is the optimal one for training purposes. Materials and Methods: The stones were produced with a mix of Bego Stone powder and water, at mixing rates of 15:03, 15:04, and 15:06. They were evaluated in an in vitro experimental setting using the Quanta Cyber 150 W high-power laser lithotripter. Dusting was set to 0.5 J × 20 Hz = 10 W and fragmentation was set to 0.8 J × 8 Hz = 6.4 W. Stone weights were assessed in dry and wet conditions. Results: The ablation rates in the dusting modality were similar for the three stone types tested. In the fragmentation mode, the mean ablation rate for 15:04 artificial stones was greater than those of 15:03 and 15:06 stones. Overall, the mean weight difference between the wet and dry stones was 0.03 g. Consequently, within the stone types tested, 15:04 artificial are probably the most convenient ones for training purposes because they get disintegrated similarly to 15:03 and 15:06 Bego Stones on a dusting setting, and ablation is faster on a fragmentation setting. Conclusions: The 15:04 Bego Stones may be considered as the optimal option for use in simulation training models of the endourological education programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信