针对帕金森病和认知障碍患者的非药物干预对以患者为中心的结果的有效性和可行性:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Parkinson's Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3654652
Jennifer S Pigott, Megan Armstrong, Nujhat Tabassum, Nathan Davies, Anette Schrag
{"title":"针对帕金森病和认知障碍患者的非药物干预对以患者为中心的结果的有效性和可行性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Jennifer S Pigott, Megan Armstrong, Nujhat Tabassum, Nathan Davies, Anette Schrag","doi":"10.1155/2024/3654652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) but has limited treatment options. Medication has shown some benefits but accompanied by risk of adverse events. We aimed to investigate effectiveness and feasibility of nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment on patient-centred outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Systematic searches of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) were performed for studies evaluating nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment, reporting health-related quality of life, function (activities of daily living) or wellbeing outcomes, published up to 15 May 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles and one reviewer extracted data, with a second reviewer reliability checking all data extraction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were synthesised through meta-analysis using a random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood method pooled estimate and observational studies through narrative synthesis. <b>Results:</b> Eleven RCTs and three noncontrolled studies were included, studying a range of interventions: cognitive training, cognitive stimulation, cognitive rehabilitation, physical and cognitive exercise, goal management training, psychoeducation with mindfulness, broader rehabilitation programs and a psychological intervention. Feasibility was demonstrated. The majority showed effectiveness for their primary outcome. Meta-analysis showed no significant improvement in HrQoL (seven RCTs: pooled effect, standardised mean difference, -0.20 [-0.57-0.18]) or function (four RCTs: 0.08 [-0.36, 0.52]), and wellbeing measurement was infrequent and indirect. Quality of evidence was judged as very low, limiting the conclusions drawn. <b>Conclusion:</b> Whilst nonpharmacological trials for cognitive impairment in PD have shown promise, we found no evidence of effectiveness on HrQoL, function or wellbeing. However, this is based on very low-quality evidence from a small number of diverse studies, not powered for these outcomes. Feasibility of a range of interventions has been demonstrated in both PD-mild cognitive impairment and PD-dementia. There is a need for more robust, adequately powered studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19907,"journal":{"name":"Parkinson's Disease","volume":"2024 ","pages":"3654652"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Feasibility of Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Parkinson's Disease and Cognitive Impairment on Patient-Centred Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S Pigott, Megan Armstrong, Nujhat Tabassum, Nathan Davies, Anette Schrag\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3654652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) but has limited treatment options. Medication has shown some benefits but accompanied by risk of adverse events. We aimed to investigate effectiveness and feasibility of nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment on patient-centred outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Systematic searches of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) were performed for studies evaluating nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment, reporting health-related quality of life, function (activities of daily living) or wellbeing outcomes, published up to 15 May 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles and one reviewer extracted data, with a second reviewer reliability checking all data extraction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were synthesised through meta-analysis using a random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood method pooled estimate and observational studies through narrative synthesis. <b>Results:</b> Eleven RCTs and three noncontrolled studies were included, studying a range of interventions: cognitive training, cognitive stimulation, cognitive rehabilitation, physical and cognitive exercise, goal management training, psychoeducation with mindfulness, broader rehabilitation programs and a psychological intervention. Feasibility was demonstrated. The majority showed effectiveness for their primary outcome. Meta-analysis showed no significant improvement in HrQoL (seven RCTs: pooled effect, standardised mean difference, -0.20 [-0.57-0.18]) or function (four RCTs: 0.08 [-0.36, 0.52]), and wellbeing measurement was infrequent and indirect. Quality of evidence was judged as very low, limiting the conclusions drawn. <b>Conclusion:</b> Whilst nonpharmacological trials for cognitive impairment in PD have shown promise, we found no evidence of effectiveness on HrQoL, function or wellbeing. However, this is based on very low-quality evidence from a small number of diverse studies, not powered for these outcomes. Feasibility of a range of interventions has been demonstrated in both PD-mild cognitive impairment and PD-dementia. There is a need for more robust, adequately powered studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"3654652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588407/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parkinson's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3654652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3654652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:认知障碍是帕金森病(PD)的常见病,但治疗方法有限。药物治疗有一定的疗效,但同时也存在不良反应的风险。我们旨在研究针对帕金森病和认知障碍患者的非药物干预对以患者为中心的结果的有效性和可行性。研究方法我们对五个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science)进行了系统检索,以查找截至 2023 年 5 月 15 日发表的评估针对帕金森病和认知障碍患者的非药物干预措施的研究,这些研究报告了与健康相关的生活质量、功能(日常生活活动)或福利结果。两名审稿人独立评估文章全文,一名审稿人提取数据,另一名审稿人对所有数据提取进行可靠性检查。随机对照试验(RCT)采用随机效应荟萃分析和限制性最大似然法集合估计进行综合,观察性研究则采用叙述性综合。结果:共纳入了 11 项研究性试验和 3 项非对照研究,研究了一系列干预措施:认知训练、认知刺激、认知康复、身体和认知锻炼、目标管理训练、正念心理教育、更广泛的康复计划和心理干预。这些研究都证明了其可行性。大多数研究显示其主要结果是有效的。Meta 分析表明,HrQoL(七项研究:集合效应,标准化平均差,-0.20 [-0.57-0.18] )或功能(四项研究:0.08 [-0.36, 0.52])没有明显改善,幸福感测量不频繁且间接。证据质量被判定为非常低,从而限制了得出的结论。结论虽然针对帕金森病认知障碍的非药物试验显示出了前景,但我们没有发现对 HrQoL、功能或幸福感有效的证据。然而,这只是基于来自少数不同研究的极低质量的证据,并没有为这些结果提供动力。在帕金森病-轻度认知障碍和帕金森病-痴呆症中,一系列干预措施的可行性已得到证实。有必要进行更多可靠的、有充分证据支持的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With Parkinson's Disease and Cognitive Impairment on Patient-Centred Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD) but has limited treatment options. Medication has shown some benefits but accompanied by risk of adverse events. We aimed to investigate effectiveness and feasibility of nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment on patient-centred outcomes. Methods: Systematic searches of five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science) were performed for studies evaluating nonpharmacological interventions for people with PD and cognitive impairment, reporting health-related quality of life, function (activities of daily living) or wellbeing outcomes, published up to 15 May 2023. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles and one reviewer extracted data, with a second reviewer reliability checking all data extraction. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were synthesised through meta-analysis using a random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood method pooled estimate and observational studies through narrative synthesis. Results: Eleven RCTs and three noncontrolled studies were included, studying a range of interventions: cognitive training, cognitive stimulation, cognitive rehabilitation, physical and cognitive exercise, goal management training, psychoeducation with mindfulness, broader rehabilitation programs and a psychological intervention. Feasibility was demonstrated. The majority showed effectiveness for their primary outcome. Meta-analysis showed no significant improvement in HrQoL (seven RCTs: pooled effect, standardised mean difference, -0.20 [-0.57-0.18]) or function (four RCTs: 0.08 [-0.36, 0.52]), and wellbeing measurement was infrequent and indirect. Quality of evidence was judged as very low, limiting the conclusions drawn. Conclusion: Whilst nonpharmacological trials for cognitive impairment in PD have shown promise, we found no evidence of effectiveness on HrQoL, function or wellbeing. However, this is based on very low-quality evidence from a small number of diverse studies, not powered for these outcomes. Feasibility of a range of interventions has been demonstrated in both PD-mild cognitive impairment and PD-dementia. There is a need for more robust, adequately powered studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Parkinson’s Disease is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, genetics, cellular, molecular and neurophysiology, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信