Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao
{"title":"评估用于诊断小肠细菌过度生长的新型智能胶囊细菌检测系统设备","authors":"Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>-1</sup> cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Novel Smart Capsule Bacterial Detection System Device for Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.\",\"authors\":\"Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>-1</sup> cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a Novel Smart Capsule Bacterial Detection System Device for Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.
Background: There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.
Methods: Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.
Key results: Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 103 or 105 CFU mL-1 cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.
Conclusions and inferences: The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.