评估用于诊断小肠细菌过度生长的新型智能胶囊细菌检测系统设备

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao
{"title":"评估用于诊断小肠细菌过度生长的新型智能胶囊细菌检测系统设备","authors":"Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>-1</sup> cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Novel Smart Capsule Bacterial Detection System Device for Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.\",\"authors\":\"Shaoying Nikki Lee, Pejman Rahimian, Cheryl Stork, Baharak Moshiree, Mitchell Jones, Emil Chuang, Chris Wahl, Sharat Singh, Satish S C Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 10<sup>3</sup> or 10<sup>5</sup> CFU mL<sup>-1</sup> cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)进行替代性、非侵入性和准确诊断的需求尚未得到满足。智能胶囊细菌检测系统(SCBDS)设备包含一种靶向采样技术和一种板载 SCBDS 检测方法,用于检测小肠中代谢活跃的细菌。在此,我们在一项多中心临床研究中评估了 SCBDS 检测与十二指肠穿刺/体外培养的一致性:方法:对有胃肠道症状提示 SIBO 的受试者进行十二指肠抽吸。吸出液被送往当地和中央微生物实验室,以评估 SCBDS 检测法与细菌总数(TBC)参考标准相比在检测细菌方面的一致性。使用接收者操作曲线、灵敏度和特异性评估了 SCBDS 检测的性能:主要结果:收集了 66 名患者的抽吸物,并对其进行了 TBC 和 SCDBS 检测分析。在 3 个临床地点,两种检测方法的总体一致性为 82%-92% 。使用≥ 103 或 105 CFU mL-1 临界值,SCBDS 检测的灵敏度为 67%-100%,特异性为 90%-97%。此外,当地实验室和中心实验室的 TBC 培养结果之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.82):SCBDS检测与TBC的一致性很高,与其他非侵入性检测相比性能更好。这些结果表明,SCBDS 设备作为一种简单、无创的工具,在辅助 SIBO 诊断方面具有潜在的实用性,值得进一步临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a Novel Smart Capsule Bacterial Detection System Device for Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

Background: There is a large unmet need for alternative, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The smart capsule bacterial detection system (SCBDS) device contains a targeted sampling technology and an onboard SCBDS assay to detect metabolically active bacteria in the small intestine. Here, we evaluated the agreement of SCBDS assay with duodenal aspiration/culture ex vivo in a multicenter clinical study.

Methods: Duodenal aspiration was performed in subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of SIBO. Aspirated fluid was sent to local and central microbiology labs to evaluate the agreement for detecting bacteria with SCBDS assay compared to the total bacterial count (TBC) reference standard. The performance of SCBDS assay was evaluated using a receiver operator curve, sensitivities, and specificities.

Key results: Aspirates from 66 patients were collected and analyzed for TBC and SCDBS assay. The overall agreement between the two assays was 82%-92% across 3 clinical sites. The SCBDS assay had a sensitivity of 67%-100% and a specificity of 90%-97% using either ≥ 103 or 105 CFU mL-1 cutoff. Additionally, there was a good correlation (r = 0.82) for the TBC culture between the local and central labs.

Conclusions and inferences: The SCBDS assay showed a high level of agreement with TBC and improved performance compared to other non-invasive tests. These results demonstrate the potential utility of SCBDS device to aid SIBO diagnosis as a simple and non-invasive tool that merits further clinical validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信