联合筛查和人乳头状瘤病毒 16 和 18 周期阈值对 CIN2+ 宫颈病变的诊断意义。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S488125
Xue Bai, Ya-Kun Liu, Ya-Jing Jia, Dao-Juan Li, Nai-Yi Du
{"title":"联合筛查和人乳头状瘤病毒 16 和 18 周期阈值对 CIN2+ 宫颈病变的诊断意义。","authors":"Xue Bai, Ya-Kun Liu, Ya-Jing Jia, Dao-Juan Li, Nai-Yi Du","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S488125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although both cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and CIN III carry the potential to progress into cervical cancer, to date, an optimal screening method for CIN2+ (CIN II, CIN III, and cervical cancer) cervical lesions is yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from 2035 patients treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. The screening efficacy of three methods-the ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) alone, the high-risk-human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test alone, and the combined TCT and HR-HPV screening for CIN2+ lesions-were assessed using cervical histopathology as the reference standard. Additionally, correlations between HPV16 cycle threshold (Ct) values, HPV18 Ct values, and the severity of cervical lesions were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the diagnostic utility of HPV16 Ct values for CIN2+ lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with TCT or HR-HPV testing alone, the combined TCT and HR-HPV test had the highest sensitivity of 98.1% (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), the highest negative predictive value of 99.8% (<i>P</i> = 0.0001), and the lowest missed diagnosis rate of 1.9% (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) for screening CIN2+ lesions. Additionally, the combined test yielded the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.9480. There was a significant difference in HPV16 Ct values for various degrees of cervical lesions (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with the Spearman rank correlation test revealing a significant negative correlation (<i>rs</i> = -0.447, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The optimal HPV16 Ct value for diagnosing CIN2+ lesions was 29.995, with an AUC of 0.797 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TCT and HR-HPV testing was the most effective method for screening CIN2+ lesions. Furthermore, HPV16 Ct values were negatively correlated with the severity of cervical lesions, with a threshold of 29.995 potentially indicating the presence of CIN2+ lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"1959-1968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnostic Significance of Combined Screening and Human Papillomavirus 16 and 18 Cycle Threshold Values for CIN2+ Cervical Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Xue Bai, Ya-Kun Liu, Ya-Jing Jia, Dao-Juan Li, Nai-Yi Du\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJWH.S488125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although both cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and CIN III carry the potential to progress into cervical cancer, to date, an optimal screening method for CIN2+ (CIN II, CIN III, and cervical cancer) cervical lesions is yet to be established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, data from 2035 patients treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. The screening efficacy of three methods-the ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) alone, the high-risk-human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test alone, and the combined TCT and HR-HPV screening for CIN2+ lesions-were assessed using cervical histopathology as the reference standard. Additionally, correlations between HPV16 cycle threshold (Ct) values, HPV18 Ct values, and the severity of cervical lesions were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the diagnostic utility of HPV16 Ct values for CIN2+ lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with TCT or HR-HPV testing alone, the combined TCT and HR-HPV test had the highest sensitivity of 98.1% (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), the highest negative predictive value of 99.8% (<i>P</i> = 0.0001), and the lowest missed diagnosis rate of 1.9% (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) for screening CIN2+ lesions. Additionally, the combined test yielded the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.9480. There was a significant difference in HPV16 Ct values for various degrees of cervical lesions (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with the Spearman rank correlation test revealing a significant negative correlation (<i>rs</i> = -0.447, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The optimal HPV16 Ct value for diagnosing CIN2+ lesions was 29.995, with an AUC of 0.797 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TCT and HR-HPV testing was the most effective method for screening CIN2+ lesions. Furthermore, HPV16 Ct values were negatively correlated with the severity of cervical lesions, with a threshold of 29.995 potentially indicating the presence of CIN2+ lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1959-1968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S488125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S488125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)II和CIN III都有可能发展为宫颈癌,但迄今为止,CIN2+(CIN II、CIN III和宫颈癌)宫颈病变的最佳筛查方法尚未确立:在这项回顾性研究中,分析了河北医科大学第四医院 2019 年至 2021 年期间收治的 2035 例患者的数据。以宫颈组织病理学为参考标准,评估了三种方法的筛查效果--单纯薄层细胞学检测(ThinPrep cytologic test,TCT)、单纯高危人乳头瘤病毒(High-risk-human papillomavirus,HR-HPV)检测以及TCT和HR-HPV联合筛查CIN2+病变。此外,还分析了 HPV16 周期阈值 (Ct) 值、HPV18 Ct 值和宫颈病变严重程度之间的相关性。绘制了接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线,以评估HPV16 Ct值对CIN2+病变的诊断效用:结果:与单独的TCT或HR-HPV检测相比,TCT和HR-HPV联合检测筛查CIN2+病变的灵敏度最高,为98.1%(P < 0.0001),阴性预测值最高,为99.8%(P = 0.0001),漏诊率最低,为1.9%(P < 0.0001)。此外,联合检测的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)值最大,为 0.9480。不同程度宫颈病变的 HPV16 Ct 值有明显差异(P < 0.001),斯皮尔曼秩相关检验显示出明显的负相关(rs = -0.447,P < 0.001)。诊断 CIN2+ 病变的最佳 HPV16 Ct 值为 29.995,AUC 为 0.797(P < 0.0001):结论:TCT和HR-HPV检测相结合是筛查CIN2+病变最有效的方法。此外,HPV16 Ct 值与宫颈病变的严重程度呈负相关,阈值为 29.995 时可能表明存在 CIN2+ 病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diagnostic Significance of Combined Screening and Human Papillomavirus 16 and 18 Cycle Threshold Values for CIN2+ Cervical Lesions.

Background: Although both cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) II and CIN III carry the potential to progress into cervical cancer, to date, an optimal screening method for CIN2+ (CIN II, CIN III, and cervical cancer) cervical lesions is yet to be established.

Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 2035 patients treated at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between 2019 and 2021 were analyzed. The screening efficacy of three methods-the ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) alone, the high-risk-human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test alone, and the combined TCT and HR-HPV screening for CIN2+ lesions-were assessed using cervical histopathology as the reference standard. Additionally, correlations between HPV16 cycle threshold (Ct) values, HPV18 Ct values, and the severity of cervical lesions were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to evaluate the diagnostic utility of HPV16 Ct values for CIN2+ lesions.

Results: Compared with TCT or HR-HPV testing alone, the combined TCT and HR-HPV test had the highest sensitivity of 98.1% (P < 0.0001), the highest negative predictive value of 99.8% (P = 0.0001), and the lowest missed diagnosis rate of 1.9% (P < 0.0001) for screening CIN2+ lesions. Additionally, the combined test yielded the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.9480. There was a significant difference in HPV16 Ct values for various degrees of cervical lesions (P < 0.001), with the Spearman rank correlation test revealing a significant negative correlation (rs = -0.447, P < 0.001). The optimal HPV16 Ct value for diagnosing CIN2+ lesions was 29.995, with an AUC of 0.797 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The combination of TCT and HR-HPV testing was the most effective method for screening CIN2+ lesions. Furthermore, HPV16 Ct values were negatively correlated with the severity of cervical lesions, with a threshold of 29.995 potentially indicating the presence of CIN2+ lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信