Sof-Lex、Eve 和 Astropol 抛光系统对老化后复合树脂表面粗糙度的体外效应。

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i35.16473
Keyvan Saati, Sara Valizadeh, Anahita Rahmaniparast, Mandana Karimi
{"title":"Sof-Lex、Eve 和 Astropol 抛光系统对老化后复合树脂表面粗糙度的体外效应。","authors":"Keyvan Saati, Sara Valizadeh, Anahita Rahmaniparast, Mandana Karimi","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i35.16473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Surface roughness is one of the important properties of composite restorations. Different polishing systems are used to provide an appropriate composite restoration surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol polishing systems on composite resin surface roughness after aging. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this in vitro study, 36 composite discs (8×2mm) were fabricated. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (N=12) for polishing with (I) Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), (II) Eve (Ernst Vetter GmbH), and (III) Astropol (Ivoclar/Vivadent) polishing systems. The specimens were then subjected to thermocycling. Surface roughness of the specimens was measured before and after polishing, and after thermocycling by a contact profilometer. Repeated Measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data (α=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Although Astropol showed slightly higher surface roughness in comparison to Sof-Lex and Eve, the level of surface roughness before and after polishing and after aging was not significantly different among the three polishing systems (P=0.704). <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol showed similar acceptable results with regard to composite resin surface roughness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Vitro Effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol Polishing Systems on Composite Resin Surface Roughness after Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Keyvan Saati, Sara Valizadeh, Anahita Rahmaniparast, Mandana Karimi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fid.v21i35.16473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Surface roughness is one of the important properties of composite restorations. Different polishing systems are used to provide an appropriate composite restoration surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol polishing systems on composite resin surface roughness after aging. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this in vitro study, 36 composite discs (8×2mm) were fabricated. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (N=12) for polishing with (I) Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), (II) Eve (Ernst Vetter GmbH), and (III) Astropol (Ivoclar/Vivadent) polishing systems. The specimens were then subjected to thermocycling. Surface roughness of the specimens was measured before and after polishing, and after thermocycling by a contact profilometer. Repeated Measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data (α=0.05). <b>Results:</b> Although Astropol showed slightly higher surface roughness in comparison to Sof-Lex and Eve, the level of surface roughness before and after polishing and after aging was not significantly different among the three polishing systems (P=0.704). <b>Conclusion:</b> Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol showed similar acceptable results with regard to composite resin surface roughness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i35.16473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i35.16473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:表面粗糙度是复合材料修复体的重要特性之一。为了获得合适的复合树脂修复体表面,需要使用不同的抛光系统。本研究旨在评估 Sof-Lex、Eve 和 Astropol 研磨系统对复合树脂老化后表面粗糙度的影响。材料和方法:在这项体外研究中,我们制作了 36 个复合树脂盘(8×2 毫米)。将试样随机分为三组(N=12),分别使用(I)Sof-Lex(3M ESPE)、(II)Eve(Ernst Vetter GmbH)和(III)Astropol(Ivoclar/Vivadent)抛光系统进行抛光。然后对试样进行热循环处理。用接触式轮廓仪测量试样在抛光前后和热循环后的表面粗糙度。采用重复测量方差分析法分析数据(α=0.05)。结果:虽然 Astropol 的表面粗糙度略高于 Sof-Lex 和 Eve,但三种抛光系统在抛光前后和老化后的表面粗糙度水平没有显著差异(P=0.704)。结论在这项体外研究的限制条件下,Sof-Lex、Eve 和 Astropol 在复合树脂表面粗糙度方面表现出了相似的可接受结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Vitro Effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol Polishing Systems on Composite Resin Surface Roughness after Aging.

Objectives: Surface roughness is one of the important properties of composite restorations. Different polishing systems are used to provide an appropriate composite restoration surface. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol polishing systems on composite resin surface roughness after aging. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 36 composite discs (8×2mm) were fabricated. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups (N=12) for polishing with (I) Sof-Lex (3M ESPE), (II) Eve (Ernst Vetter GmbH), and (III) Astropol (Ivoclar/Vivadent) polishing systems. The specimens were then subjected to thermocycling. Surface roughness of the specimens was measured before and after polishing, and after thermocycling by a contact profilometer. Repeated Measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data (α=0.05). Results: Although Astropol showed slightly higher surface roughness in comparison to Sof-Lex and Eve, the level of surface roughness before and after polishing and after aging was not significantly different among the three polishing systems (P=0.704). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Sof-Lex, Eve, and Astropol showed similar acceptable results with regard to composite resin surface roughness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信