中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为肝移植或肺移植术后重症患者微生物标本标记的重要性。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1007/s15010-024-02398-4
Steffen B Wiegand, Michael Paal, Jette Jung, Markus Guba, Christian M Lange, Christian Schneider, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Sebastian Michel, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为肝移植或肺移植术后重症患者微生物标本标记的重要性。","authors":"Steffen B Wiegand, Michael Paal, Jette Jung, Markus Guba, Christian M Lange, Christian Schneider, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Sebastian Michel, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02398-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The correct and early diagnosis of an infection is pivotal for patients, especially if the patients are immunocompromised. Various infection markers are used in clinics with different advantages and disadvantages. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a cost effective parameter easily obtained without further investments. The aim of this study is to elucidate the value of the NLR in comparison to other established inflammation markers in patients in the intensive care unit who underwent liver or lung transplantation for the detection of bacterial and fungal specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single centre study infection marker and microbiology data of 543 intensive care cases of liver or lung transplanted patients in the intensive care unit after transplantation were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 5,072 lab work results and 1,104 positive microbiology results were analysed. Results of an area under curve analysis were better for the NLR (0.631; p < 0.001) than for CRP (0.522; p = 0.152) or IL-6 (0.579; p < 0.001). The NLR was independent of type of organ which was transplanted and gender of patients, whereas IL-6 values differed significantly between liver and lung transplanted patients and between male and female.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All analysed inflammation markers are far from being perfect. The NLR is a sensitive marker with reasonable threshold for the detection of microbiological specimens independent of gender or type of organ transplanted. The use allows a more differentiated approach to face the challenge of bacteria and fungus in patients who underwent liver or lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":"573-582"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker for microbiological specimens in critically ill patients after liver or lung transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Steffen B Wiegand, Michael Paal, Jette Jung, Markus Guba, Christian M Lange, Christian Schneider, Nikolaus Kneidinger, Sebastian Michel, Michael Irlbeck, Michael Zoller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-024-02398-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The correct and early diagnosis of an infection is pivotal for patients, especially if the patients are immunocompromised. Various infection markers are used in clinics with different advantages and disadvantages. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a cost effective parameter easily obtained without further investments. The aim of this study is to elucidate the value of the NLR in comparison to other established inflammation markers in patients in the intensive care unit who underwent liver or lung transplantation for the detection of bacterial and fungal specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single centre study infection marker and microbiology data of 543 intensive care cases of liver or lung transplanted patients in the intensive care unit after transplantation were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 5,072 lab work results and 1,104 positive microbiology results were analysed. Results of an area under curve analysis were better for the NLR (0.631; p < 0.001) than for CRP (0.522; p = 0.152) or IL-6 (0.579; p < 0.001). The NLR was independent of type of organ which was transplanted and gender of patients, whereas IL-6 values differed significantly between liver and lung transplanted patients and between male and female.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All analysed inflammation markers are far from being perfect. The NLR is a sensitive marker with reasonable threshold for the detection of microbiological specimens independent of gender or type of organ transplanted. The use allows a more differentiated approach to face the challenge of bacteria and fungus in patients who underwent liver or lung transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"573-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02398-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02398-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:正确和早期诊断感染对患者至关重要,尤其是免疫力低下的患者。临床上使用的各种感染指标各有利弊。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是一种经济有效的参数,无需进一步投资即可轻松获得。本研究的目的是在重症监护病房接受肝移植或肺移植的患者中,阐明 NLR 与其他已确立的炎症指标相比,在检测细菌和真菌标本方面的价值:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,分析了543例肝移植或肺移植患者移植后在重症监护室的感染标志物和微生物学数据:共分析了 5,072 项实验室工作结果和 1,104 项微生物学阳性结果。NLR的曲线下面积分析结果较好(0.631;P 结论:所有分析的炎症指标都与NLR有关:所有分析的炎症指标都远非完美。NLR 是一种灵敏的标志物,对微生物标本的检测具有合理的阈值,不受性别或移植器官类型的影响。使用该指标可以更有针对性地应对肝脏或肺脏移植患者的细菌和真菌挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Importance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker for microbiological specimens in critically ill patients after liver or lung transplantation.

Purpose: The correct and early diagnosis of an infection is pivotal for patients, especially if the patients are immunocompromised. Various infection markers are used in clinics with different advantages and disadvantages. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a cost effective parameter easily obtained without further investments. The aim of this study is to elucidate the value of the NLR in comparison to other established inflammation markers in patients in the intensive care unit who underwent liver or lung transplantation for the detection of bacterial and fungal specimens.

Methods: In this retrospective single centre study infection marker and microbiology data of 543 intensive care cases of liver or lung transplanted patients in the intensive care unit after transplantation were analysed.

Results: In total 5,072 lab work results and 1,104 positive microbiology results were analysed. Results of an area under curve analysis were better for the NLR (0.631; p < 0.001) than for CRP (0.522; p = 0.152) or IL-6 (0.579; p < 0.001). The NLR was independent of type of organ which was transplanted and gender of patients, whereas IL-6 values differed significantly between liver and lung transplanted patients and between male and female.

Conclusion: All analysed inflammation markers are far from being perfect. The NLR is a sensitive marker with reasonable threshold for the detection of microbiological specimens independent of gender or type of organ transplanted. The use allows a more differentiated approach to face the challenge of bacteria and fungus in patients who underwent liver or lung transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信