采用 p-TIPS 治疗急性静脉曲张出血的挑战与机遇:来自美国三级医疗中心的启示。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Stela Celaj, J Estevez, Paula Novelli, Philip Orons, Ali Al-Khafaji, Naudia L Jonassaint, Ruy J Cruz, Shahid M Malik
{"title":"采用 p-TIPS 治疗急性静脉曲张出血的挑战与机遇:来自美国三级医疗中心的启示。","authors":"Stela Celaj, J Estevez, Paula Novelli, Philip Orons, Ali Al-Khafaji, Naudia L Jonassaint, Ruy J Cruz, Shahid M Malik","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08745-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Since the overwhelmingly positive results of the 'early use of TIPS' published in 2010, studies in Europe and Asia have confirmed early/pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (p-TIPS) in high-risk patients with acute variceal bleed (AVB) reduces treatment failure and mortality compared to standard of care (SOC). There are no studies evaluating p-TIPS in a US cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of patients with cirrhosis from June 2010 to June 2020 with AVB was conducted from a single large US center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 745 cirrhotic patients with AVB, 18% met criteria for p-TIPS. Alcohol and HCV accounted for 75% of etiology; 13% MASLD. The mean MELD-Na score in our cohort was 24, which is ten points higher than reported in the literature for over 600 p-TIPS cases. Only 9 patients underwent p-TIPS. Patients undergoing p-TIPS were less likely to have MASLD, more likely to be female and less likely to have PSE at baseline. One-year mortality in the SOC group (including patients undergoing 'rescue TIPS') was 53% versus 0% for p-TIPS (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observation suggests hesitancy among providers to recommend p-TIPS, likely due to concerns regarding a 'sicker' patient population. The current SOC in high-risk patients remain suboptimal. Limited data, including our own, suggest that p-TIPS may confer a survival benefit even in patients with high MELD. However, the recommendation of p-TIPS in such patients necessitates validation of its safety and efficacy. Consequently, we advocate for a RCT in the US to conclusively assess the utility of p-TIPS in this context. Until such evidence is established, it is likely that underutilization of this life-saving intervention will persist.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and Opportunities in the Adoption of p-TIPS for Acute Variceal Bleeding: Insights from a US Tertiary Center.\",\"authors\":\"Stela Celaj, J Estevez, Paula Novelli, Philip Orons, Ali Al-Khafaji, Naudia L Jonassaint, Ruy J Cruz, Shahid M Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08745-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Since the overwhelmingly positive results of the 'early use of TIPS' published in 2010, studies in Europe and Asia have confirmed early/pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (p-TIPS) in high-risk patients with acute variceal bleed (AVB) reduces treatment failure and mortality compared to standard of care (SOC). There are no studies evaluating p-TIPS in a US cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of patients with cirrhosis from June 2010 to June 2020 with AVB was conducted from a single large US center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 745 cirrhotic patients with AVB, 18% met criteria for p-TIPS. Alcohol and HCV accounted for 75% of etiology; 13% MASLD. The mean MELD-Na score in our cohort was 24, which is ten points higher than reported in the literature for over 600 p-TIPS cases. Only 9 patients underwent p-TIPS. Patients undergoing p-TIPS were less likely to have MASLD, more likely to be female and less likely to have PSE at baseline. One-year mortality in the SOC group (including patients undergoing 'rescue TIPS') was 53% versus 0% for p-TIPS (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our observation suggests hesitancy among providers to recommend p-TIPS, likely due to concerns regarding a 'sicker' patient population. The current SOC in high-risk patients remain suboptimal. Limited data, including our own, suggest that p-TIPS may confer a survival benefit even in patients with high MELD. However, the recommendation of p-TIPS in such patients necessitates validation of its safety and efficacy. Consequently, we advocate for a RCT in the US to conclusively assess the utility of p-TIPS in this context. Until such evidence is established, it is likely that underutilization of this life-saving intervention will persist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08745-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08745-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:自 2010 年发表 "早期使用 TIPS "的压倒性积极结果以来,欧洲和亚洲的研究证实,与标准护理(SOC)相比,急性静脉曲张出血(AVB)高危患者早期/先期经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(p-TIPS)可减少治疗失败和死亡率。目前还没有研究对美国队列中的 p-TIPS 进行评估:方法:对美国一家大型中心 2010 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间患有 AVB 的肝硬化患者进行回顾性研究:结果:在745名患有AVB的肝硬化患者中,18%符合p-TIPS标准。酒精和丙肝病毒占病因的75%;MASLD占13%。我们队列中的平均MELD-Na评分为24分,比文献报道的600多例p-TIPS病例高出10分。只有 9 名患者接受了 p-TIPS。接受 p-TIPS 治疗的患者中,MASLD 患者较少,女性患者较多,基线 PSE 患者较少。SOC组(包括接受 "抢救性TIPS "的患者)的一年死亡率为53%,而p-TIPS组为0%(p = 0.01):我们的观察结果表明,医疗服务提供者在推荐 p-TIPS 时犹豫不决,这可能是出于对 "病情较重 "患者群体的担忧。目前高危患者的 SOC 仍未达到最佳水平。有限的数据(包括我们自己的数据)表明,即使是高 MELD 患者,p-TIPS 也可能带来生存获益。然而,在此类患者中推荐使用 p-TIPS 需要对其安全性和有效性进行验证。因此,我们主张在美国进行一项 RCT 研究,以最终评估 p-TIPS 在这种情况下的效用。在此类证据确立之前,这种挽救生命的干预措施很可能仍未得到充分利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and Opportunities in the Adoption of p-TIPS for Acute Variceal Bleeding: Insights from a US Tertiary Center.

Background and aims: Since the overwhelmingly positive results of the 'early use of TIPS' published in 2010, studies in Europe and Asia have confirmed early/pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (p-TIPS) in high-risk patients with acute variceal bleed (AVB) reduces treatment failure and mortality compared to standard of care (SOC). There are no studies evaluating p-TIPS in a US cohort.

Methods: A review of patients with cirrhosis from June 2010 to June 2020 with AVB was conducted from a single large US center.

Results: Of 745 cirrhotic patients with AVB, 18% met criteria for p-TIPS. Alcohol and HCV accounted for 75% of etiology; 13% MASLD. The mean MELD-Na score in our cohort was 24, which is ten points higher than reported in the literature for over 600 p-TIPS cases. Only 9 patients underwent p-TIPS. Patients undergoing p-TIPS were less likely to have MASLD, more likely to be female and less likely to have PSE at baseline. One-year mortality in the SOC group (including patients undergoing 'rescue TIPS') was 53% versus 0% for p-TIPS (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: Our observation suggests hesitancy among providers to recommend p-TIPS, likely due to concerns regarding a 'sicker' patient population. The current SOC in high-risk patients remain suboptimal. Limited data, including our own, suggest that p-TIPS may confer a survival benefit even in patients with high MELD. However, the recommendation of p-TIPS in such patients necessitates validation of its safety and efficacy. Consequently, we advocate for a RCT in the US to conclusively assess the utility of p-TIPS in this context. Until such evidence is established, it is likely that underutilization of this life-saving intervention will persist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信